====================================
#opnfv-meeting: DoveTail f2f and IRC
====================================


Meeting started by ChrisPriceAB at 17:50:38 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-09-29-17.50.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Roll Call  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:50:49)
  * Chris Price  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:50:56)
  * Trevor Cooper  (trevc, 17:50:58)
  * Jack Morgan  (jmorgan1, 17:51:06)
  * Bryan Sullivan  (bryan_att, 17:51:31)

* dovetail overview  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:53:14)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+Home
    dovetail wiki page  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:53:32)
  * Docker based test framework for running a selection of test cases is
    being worked on  (trevc, 17:53:34)
  * Test specifications are being worked on  (trevc, 17:53:58)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+test+use+cases use
    cases under discussion for doevtail  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:54:42)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827269
    test case structure and requirements  (ChrisPriceAB, 17:59:35)
  * Bryan: It's my understanding that we will develop a first compliance
    test suite definition for Colorado, and that will include granular
    tests of OpenStack functions and related NBIs; application (VNF)
    tests such as vIMS, vPing, and ...  (bryan_att, 18:15:17)
  * ... maybe the tests I have developed for Models (vHello - simple
    python web server, vLamp - mult-VM lampstack from OpenStack Interop
    Challenge).  (bryan_att, 18:15:37)
  * dneary  (dneary, 18:20:52)
  * For that, as part of getting your implementation verified through a
    3rd-party, e.g. CableLabs or some other test house, we need to
    define a model for how the implementer will scope the tests done by
    the test house, e.g. something simple as a YAMLfile.  (bryan_att,
    18:23:33)
  * dneary: I do want to point out tyhat we should not be planning as if
    the CVP document is finished - it is an in-progress draft without
    board review at this point  (bryan_att, 18:26:37)
  * dneary, that's agreed in the meeting here; this is a work in
    progress  (bryan_att, 18:26:57)
  * For Colorado, we do not expect detailed feature tests or performance
    testing to be in scope.  (bryan_att, 18:28:11)
  * IPV6 overlap, SFC, L3VPN were the scope for this release, beyond
    basic platform feature tests  (bryan_att, 18:30:08)
  * wrapping up that topic and transitioning to the CVP document
    (bryan_att, 18:32:31)
  * chrispriceab adds that everyone should add and participate in the
    test use case dialog at
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Dovetail+test+use+cases
    (ChrisPriceAB, 18:33:05)
  * the meeting closes and we will now review the C&C document.
    (ChrisPriceAB, 18:33:33)



Meeting ended at 18:34:22 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* bryan_att (14)
* ChrisPriceAB (11)
* dneary (5)
* collabot (3)
* trevc (3)
* jmorgan1 (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4