================================== #opnfv-meeting: TSC weekly meeting ================================== Meeting started by tallgren at 15:01:10 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-11-08-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Uli Kleber (uli-k, 15:01:17) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 15:01:19) * Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange, 15:01:23) * Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 15:01:35) * David McBride (dmcbride, 15:01:37) * Jack Morgan (jmorgan1, 15:01:52) * Stuart Mackie (StuartMackie, 15:01:58) * Edgar StPierre (edgarstp, 15:02:03) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 15:02:11) * Lincoln Lavoie (lylavoie, 15:02:21) * Bin Hu (bin_, 15:02:27) * Tim Irnich (timirnich, 15:03:36) * agenda https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC (morgan_orange, 15:04:46) * Tim Rozet(proxy for Dave Neary) (trozet, 15:04:48) * approval of previous minutes (rpaik, 15:05:00) * Tapio asks about the state of the discussion on the proposed rescuer project. Bin answers that there are actions to close before a creation review (uli-k, 15:05:04) * no feedback on the minutes thus approved (rpaik, 15:05:17) * agenda bashing (rpaik, 15:05:24) * rprakash (rprakash, 15:05:27) * Jonas Bjurel (Stand in for Fatih) (JonasB, 15:05:35) * no other topics proposed (rpaik, 15:06:07) * Plugfest/Hackfest (rpaik, 15:06:17) * Julien (Julien-zte, 15:06:32) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Colorado+Release wiki page for the event (rpaik, 15:06:46) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel, 15:07:07) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page schedule/planning page (rpaik, 15:07:16) * 15 companies registered to Plugfest, 45 people (tallgren, 15:07:21) * 5 companies are providing equipments (rpaik, 15:07:36) * LINK: https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestDec2016 registration page (rpaik, 15:07:49) * community members are encourage to add topics for the schedule page above (rpaik, 15:08:46) * participants should collaborate with each other on plugfest work planning (rpaik, 15:09:10) * ROE is part of the registration process (rpaik, 15:11:25) * there are three rooms available for meeting/breakouts (rpaik, 15:12:53) * discussion on what can be shared publicly after the Plugfest/Hackfest within 60 days (rpaik, 15:18:22) * ROE protects results of the plugfest from disclosure, but results from Hackfest are needed for Danube release (uli-k, 15:18:22) * Graduation reviews discussion (tallgren, 15:20:13) * rpaik has started the email discussion, it is ongoing (uli-k, 15:21:32) * ACTION: rpaik to setup a discussion during plugfest/hackfest (rpaik, 15:21:55) * LINK: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/barcelona-infra-f2f (jmorgan1, 15:22:49) * configuration file and scenario naming (rpaik, 15:22:52) * LINK: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23725/ (morgan_orange, 15:23:19) * jmorgan1 summarized the discussion that started in Barcelona and noted that the current scenario naming convention could be improved (rpaik, 15:23:49) * LINK: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/23727/ (morgan_orange, 15:24:31) * jmorgan1 adds that no objections for major feedback received so far from the community (rpaik, 15:25:35) * TSC approval needed to get a commitment - change will trigger extra work especially on installer projects. But without this evolution CI evolution would not be possible (morgan_orange, 15:26:43) * questions from JonasB and frankbrockners asks if this will be scalable going forward esp. with CI evolution (rpaik, 15:29:19) * frankbrockners reminded that a similar proposal was made for Brahmaputra and later, without success (morgan_orange, 15:30:31) * a way to ensure the success of CI evolution: maybe indicate that it is a condition to be part of Danube (morgan_orange, 15:33:15) * frankbrockners asks if we are forcing people to adopt this proposal for Danube (rpaik, 15:33:45) * on the previous topic (Plugfest vs Hackfest), I created a new child page "Colorado Hackfest Test Cases", moved the VNF Portability Scope description there, and linked it to the "Co-located Plugfest-Hackfest Planning Page" page. I'll explain the rationale for the change on the list as discussed on the call. (bryan_att, 15:37:32) * jonas brings up concern to cover all architectures in these proposals (jmorgan1, 15:39:26) * Goals & vision for the Danube release (tallgren, 15:40:07) * ACTION: jmorgan1 to collect feedback over then bring proposal back in two weeks for vote (jmorgan1, 15:40:36) * uli-k encourages fbrockners and JonasB to call-in to the INFRA meeting and work on the missing parts. (uli-k, 15:41:22) * morgan_orange presents the slides at https://wiki.opnfv.org/download/attachments/2925933/Building%20a%20TSC%20vision%20for%20Danube.pptx?version=1&modificationDate=1478612403468&api=v2 (uli-k, 15:50:27) * there could be a bottom up approach from WG's, feature projects, etc. (rpaik, 15:57:54) * IMO we are certainly building reference platforms(s) (bryan_att, 15:58:23) * concern raised on if we are giving up on reference platform (rpaik, 15:58:37) * I do not understand the assertion that we are not (bryan_att, 15:58:39) * suggestion to continue the discussion via mailing list (rpaik, 15:59:51) Meeting ended at 16:00:37 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * jmorgan1 * jmorgan1 to collect feedback over then bring proposal back in two weeks for vote * rpaik * rpaik to setup a discussion during plugfest/hackfest People present (lines said) --------------------------- * rpaik (28) * trozet (13) * jmorgan1 (13) * uli-k (11) * morgan_orange (8) * collabot` (8) * tallgren (7) * bryan_att (5) * ChrisPriceAB (4) * Julien-zte (3) * dmcbride (2) * frankbrockners (1) * trevor_intel (1) * timirnich (1) * rprakash (1) * bin_ (1) * edgarstp (1) * lylavoie (1) * JonasB (1) * StuartMackie (1) * ulik (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4