#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion

Meeting started by bin_ at 14:03:29 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. Bin Hu (bin_, 14:03:39)
    2. Georg Kunz (georgk, 14:03:51)

  2. New Project Proposal "OpenRetriever" (bin_, 14:03:58)
    1. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Proposals+OpenRetriever (bin_, 14:05:45)
    2. Xuan first introduced some basic requirements (bin_, 14:08:01)
    3. followed by some background information, especially how container is supported in OpenStack (bin_, 14:08:45)
    4. Model 1 is to use the embedded container orchestration way (bin_, 14:09:33)
    5. Model 2 is to use COE (Container Orchestration Engine), such as kubernetes (bin_, 14:10:37)
    6. Model 3 is to use COE+Zun (bin_, 14:11:31)
    7. OpenRetriever focuses on Model 3 (bin_, 14:13:12)
    8. Scope, deliverables and dependencies are described (bin_, 14:14:33)
    9. followed by PTL, committers and contributors (bin_, 14:14:54)
    10. Container related issues also discussed, such as security, upgrade and kernel binding (bin_, 14:17:25)
    11. Prem (Ericsson) asks that if there is a baremetal deployment, in case of COE, regarding networking part, do you intend to use kubernetes or native COE APIs (bin_, 14:20:15)
    12. Prem and Xuan will discuss offline regarding those details (bin_, 14:20:31)
    13. Prem also asked if there is any performance impact (bin_, 14:20:54)
    14. Xuan said Intel is working on container performance (bin_, 14:21:28)
    15. Dave Neary (RedHat) asked if to use kubernetes on top of OpenStack (bin_, 14:21:50)
    16. i.e. kubernetes as VNFM and OS as VIM (Model 2) (bin_, 14:23:07)
    17. why to prefer Model 3 than Model 2 (bin_, 14:23:20)
    18. Steve Furr asked if there is an explicit goal of interoperability of VNFs instantiated by VMs and Containers (bin_, 14:25:10)
    19. Xuan may answer the questions offline (bin_, 14:25:35)
    20. Bryan (AT&T) asked why does it mean to change COE API to native API? (bin_, 14:27:58)
    21. Xuan answered that there is a project Zun in OpenStack to handle it (bin_, 14:28:34)
    22. Bryan suggested to create software within existing scenarios instead of creating additional OPNFV scenarios (bin_, 14:33:34)
    23. Uli added that those container components can be added to existing scenarios (bin_, 14:34:22)
    24. Dave N understands it as installing additional components on top of OpenStack (bin_, 14:36:39)
    25. Chris P (Ericsson) suggested to find an existing scenario to start with (bin_, 14:38:03)
    26. Bin suggested to continue discussion on mailing list. Prem, Dave or Bryan can initiated the discussion topic (bin_, 14:42:41)

  3. PlugFest Planning Wrap-up (bin_, 14:43:05)
    1. HW arriving and being setup (rpaik, 14:43:18)
    2. VPN will be setup today (rpaik, 14:44:11)
    3. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page latest plugfest schedule (rpaik, 14:45:56)
    4. Plugfest participants can work between 8am - 8pm as building will be accessible (rpaik, 14:49:36)
    5. Bryan suggested to create a wiki page of FAQ in addtion to checklist page (bin_, 14:52:28)
    6. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Project+Proposal+Creation+Review+Checklist proposal checklist (rpaik, 14:52:56)
    7. Bin will look into it, and encourage everyone to contribute. (bin_, 14:54:17)


Meeting ended at 14:54:21 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. bin_ (33)
  2. rpaik (5)
  3. collabot` (3)
  4. hongbo4545 (2)
  5. georgk (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.