===========================================
#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion
===========================================


Meeting started by bin_ at 14:03:29 UTC.  The full logs are available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2016/opnfv-meeting.2016-12-01-14.03.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Bin Hu  (bin_, 14:03:39)
* Georg Kunz  (georgk, 14:03:51)
* New Project Proposal "OpenRetriever"  (bin_, 14:03:58)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Proposals+OpenRetriever
    (bin_, 14:05:45)
  * Xuan first introduced some basic requirements  (bin_, 14:08:01)
  * followed by some background information, especially how container is
    supported in OpenStack  (bin_, 14:08:45)
  * Model 1 is to use the embedded container orchestration way  (bin_,
    14:09:33)
  * Model 2 is to use COE (Container Orchestration Engine), such as
    kubernetes  (bin_, 14:10:37)
  * Model 3 is to use COE+Zun  (bin_, 14:11:31)
  * OpenRetriever focuses on Model 3  (bin_, 14:13:12)
  * Scope, deliverables and dependencies are described  (bin_, 14:14:33)
  * followed by PTL, committers and contributors  (bin_, 14:14:54)
  * Container related issues also discussed, such as security, upgrade
    and kernel binding  (bin_, 14:17:25)
  * Prem (Ericsson) asks that if there is a baremetal deployment, in
    case of COE, regarding networking part, do you intend to use
    kubernetes or native COE APIs  (bin_, 14:20:15)
  * Prem and Xuan will discuss offline regarding those details  (bin_,
    14:20:31)
  * Prem also asked if there is any performance impact  (bin_, 14:20:54)
  * Xuan said Intel is working on container performance  (bin_,
    14:21:28)
  * Dave Neary (RedHat) asked if to use kubernetes on top of OpenStack
    (bin_, 14:21:50)
  * i.e. kubernetes as VNFM and OS as VIM (Model 2)  (bin_, 14:23:07)
  * why to prefer Model 3 than Model 2  (bin_, 14:23:20)
  * Steve Furr asked if there is an explicit goal of interoperability of
    VNFs instantiated by VMs and Containers  (bin_, 14:25:10)
  * Xuan may answer the questions offline  (bin_, 14:25:35)
  * Bryan (AT&T) asked why does it mean to change COE API to native API?
    (bin_, 14:27:58)
  * Xuan answered that there is a project Zun in OpenStack to handle it
    (bin_, 14:28:34)
  * Bryan suggested to create software within existing scenarios instead
    of creating additional OPNFV scenarios  (bin_, 14:33:34)
  * Uli added that those container components can be added to existing
    scenarios  (bin_, 14:34:22)
  * Dave N understands it as installing additional components on top of
    OpenStack  (bin_, 14:36:39)
  * Chris P (Ericsson) suggested to find an existing scenario to start
    with  (bin_, 14:38:03)
  * Bin suggested to continue discussion on mailing list. Prem, Dave or
    Bryan can initiated the discussion topic  (bin_, 14:42:41)

* PlugFest Planning Wrap-up  (bin_, 14:43:05)
  * HW arriving and being setup  (rpaik, 14:43:18)
  * VPN will be setup today  (rpaik, 14:44:11)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page
    latest plugfest schedule  (rpaik, 14:45:56)
  * Plugfest participants can work between 8am - 8pm as building will be
    accessible  (rpaik, 14:49:36)
  * Bryan suggested to create a wiki page of FAQ in addtion to checklist
    page  (bin_, 14:52:28)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Project+Proposal+Creation+Review+Checklist
    proposal checklist  (rpaik, 14:52:56)
  * Bin will look into it, and encourage everyone to contribute.  (bin_,
    14:54:17)



Meeting ended at 14:54:21 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* bin_ (33)
* rpaik (5)
* collabot` (3)
* hongbo4545 (2)
* georgk (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4