#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Community Meeting

Meeting started by bh526r at 14:03:58 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Strategic Items in Technical Community Discussion (bh526r, 14:06:42)
    1. Bryan proposed it on the mailing list (bh526r, 14:07:02)
    2. The background is that the Polestar WG is addressing strategic aspects from EUAG, which is good (bh526r, 14:07:40)
    3. If the strategy is related to implementation etc. technical nature, it is more appropriate to discuss it in technical community (bh526r, 14:08:20)
    4. Suggestion is to start to discuss on it (bh526r, 14:10:06)
    5. Bin Hu (bh526r, 14:10:51)
    6. Bryan Sullivan (bh526r, 14:10:57)
    7. Aimee Ukasick (bh526r, 14:11:12)
    8. Amar Kapadia (bh526r, 14:11:36)
    9. Dan Druta (bh526r, 14:11:51)
    10. Dave Neary (bh526r, 14:12:18)
    11. David McBride (bh526r, 14:12:34)
    12. Giuseppe Carella (bh526r, 14:12:53)
    13. Uli (uli-k, 14:13:05)
    14. Pasi Vaananen (bh526r, 14:13:23)
    15. Prakash Ramchandran (bh526r, 14:13:46)
    16. Dan Radez (bh526r, 14:13:58)
    17. Tapio Tallgren (bh526r, 14:14:12)
    18. Timo Perala (bh526r, 14:14:45)
    19. Hongbo Tian (bh526r, 14:15:32)
    20. Stuart Mackie (bh526r, 14:18:28)
    21. The discussion focused on specific examples (bh526r, 14:20:58)
    22. Narinder Gupta (bh526r, 14:29:28)
    23. Al Morton (bh526r, 14:30:09)
    24. Bryan will bring specific proposal on the table, e.g. focusing on devops model, using devstack or packstack, etc. (bh526r, 14:32:01)
    25. Uli added to coordinate with Fatih (bh526r, 14:32:26)

  2. Update of Scenario Consolidation (bh526r, 14:32:56)
    1. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Scenario+Consolidation (uli-k, 14:33:00)
    2. Uli had discussions with Joid, Fuel, Apex etc. teams (bh526r, 14:33:58)
    3. Uli collected information from those installers, e.g. from repos, started to compare yaml files (bh526r, 14:35:24)
    4. With comparison of those yamls, we may start to propose the common characteristics of scenarios (bh526r, 14:36:32)
    5. The proposal is the future step once the comparison is done (bh526r, 14:36:50)
    6. Uli can do a lot of proposals, but he needs review and comment (bh526r, 14:37:30)
    7. He can use ppt, easy to illustrate and present, but difficult to maintain as a record (bh526r, 14:38:04)
    8. what if we move it to gerrit? (bh526r, 14:38:16)
    9. Uli will move it to rst file, and appreciate review and comments (bh526r, 14:39:32)
    10. Dan Radez thinks it is a right approach, and community is moving to this direction anyway (bh526r, 14:39:56)
    11. Bryan asked which project's repo? (bh526r, 14:40:08)
    12. Uli said Octopus repo (bh526r, 14:40:16)
    13. All agreed above suggestion, and Uli will start to work on it (bh526r, 14:41:33)

  3. Milestone Exception Process (bh526r, 14:42:33)
    1. https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8690432 (bh526r, 14:42:57)
    2. Background: during TSC call on Tuesday, this was discussed, and suggested to discuss it in technical community call on Thursday (bh526r, 14:44:48)
    3. David presented 3 options, and asked how to triage the exception requests (bh526r, 14:46:21)
    4. Tapio said the important is the visibility (bh526r, 14:54:35)
    5. transparency (bh526r, 14:54:51)
    6. meaning open communication with project team, and within project team (bh526r, 14:55:14)
    7. Uli said that we should consider whether or not the project is going to make the release (bh526r, 14:55:56)
    8. i.e. if recovery plan is credible (bh526r, 14:56:13)
    9. Option 2 is not a popular option, David will clean it up and continue discussion next week (bh526r, 15:00:49)


Meeting ended at 15:02:25 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. bh526r (50)
  2. collabot (3)
  3. uli-k (2)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.