#opnfv-meeting: Weekly OPNFV TSC meeting
Meeting started by tallgren at 14:59:33 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- Uli (uli-k,
14:59:48)
- hongbo (hongbo88,
14:59:56)
- Tapio Tallgren (tallgren,
15:00:28)
- Tim Irnich (timirnich,
15:01:18)
- Fatih Degirmenci (fdegir,
15:01:19)
- Rossella Sblendido (rossella_s,
15:01:22)
- Jack Morgan (jmorgan1,
15:01:31)
- Brian Skerry (bjskerry,
15:01:38)
- Xavier Costa (XavierCosta,
15:02:03)
- Dan Radez (proxy Dave Neary) (radez,
15:02:46)
- approval of previous minutes (rpaik, 15:02:48)
- Edgar StPierre (edgarstp,
15:02:54)
- typo fixed and no other feedback. minutes
apporved (rpaik,
15:03:12)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-February21,2017
today's agenda (rpaik,
15:03:29)
- tallgren notes that there are two new project
proposals (Bamboo, VINA) will be discussed during Thursday's weekly
community call (rpaik,
15:05:21)
- https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/015156.html
E-release naming nomination (rpaik,
15:05:59)
- https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/015153.html
graduation review discussion (rpaik,
15:06:34)
- tallgren also noted that CFP for OPNFV Summit
is now open (rpaik,
15:06:58)
- http://artifacts.opnfv.org/octopus/review/28443/scenario-lifecycle/index.html
(tallgren,
15:07:38)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28443
(uli-k,
15:08:09)
- https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/28443
(tallgren,
15:08:09)
- OPNFV End User Advisory Group survey discussion (rpaik, 15:09:23)
- (for VNF survey) https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/014950.html
(bryan_att,
15:09:54)
- Steven Wright gives an overview of the first
EUAG survey that was conducted in January (rpaik,
15:10:51)
- survey shows that OPNFV is being used (not in
production yet) with Fuel being the most popular installer
(rpaik,
15:12:14)
- many respondents did not fully understand
scenarios (rpaik,
15:13:53)
- respondents are interested in projects like
DPACC, Pinpoint, etc. being included in future releases (rpaik,
15:14:43)
- key pain points are interoperability, real-time
performance monitoring & fast fault detection, resiliency at
scale, etc. (rpaik,
15:15:37)
- Julien (Julien-zte,
15:16:42)
- many build or partner for their "NFV
platforms" (rpaik,
15:19:21)
- follow-up survey planned prior to the Beijing
Summit (rpaik,
15:19:43)
- there were mostly 1 respondent from each
operator for the survey (rpaik,
15:20:30)
- rpaik asks how the TSC can take the results of
the EUAG survey into account in planning the E release (tallgren,
15:25:14)
- Brandon Wick notes that sharing key EUAG pain
points with the TSC maybe a good start (rpaik,
15:26:42)
- discussion bringing the EUAG pain points topic
(e.g. with EPIC statements) to the TSC call in the next few
weeks (rpaik,
15:29:52)
- future call can be used to identify work
already in progress, gaps, etc. (rpaik,
15:31:22)
- Danube/E-release planning (rpaik, 15:33:36)
- rprakash (rprakash,
15:34:20)
- MS6 was Feb. 17th and dmcbride will be
evaluating project compliance (rpaik,
15:34:21)
- E-release schedule discussion on-going
(rpaik,
15:35:19)
- a reminder that MS7 (stable branch) is March
10th (rpaik,
15:36:45)
- APAC targeted release meeting is tonight at 7pm
PT (rpaik,
15:37:19)
- https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/015084.html
e-release timeline discussion (rpaik,
15:41:47)
- goal is to vote on the E-release schedule in
the next few weeks (rpaik,
15:43:03)
- (thread with Randy's and my comments) https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-project-leads/2017-February/000790.html
(bryan_att,
15:44:19)
- ACTION: rpaik to add
E-release timeline discussion to the TSC agenda next week
(rpaik,
15:44:31)
- OPNFV Architecture (rpaik, 15:44:47)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DOC/OPNFV+Architecture+for+Danube+release
(hongbo88,
15:45:41)
- https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DOC/OPNFV+Projects+mapping
(tallgren,
15:46:38)
- we had some clarification on this in a recent
call (TSC or community, I can't recall) that the goal of this is to
generate an infographic type view of the OPNFV project, somewhat in
the style of an arch diagram but not implying any concrete (or
specific) "architecture" for the OPNFV reference platforms.
(bryan_att,
15:48:32)
- MANO viewpoint is listed on link
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/mano/MANO+Group+Home (rprakash,
15:51:08)
- discussion on "evolving" the Colorado
architecture diagram vs. also looking at this from a different
angle (rpaik,
15:51:24)
- for example, in AT&T the role of ODL is
substantially different from what might be implied in the diagram,
vs OpenContrail and ONOS, and in fact all three have a role in the
overall set of use cases and market-specific deployments that make
up our "D2" platform vision. (bryan_att,
15:51:36)
- this diagram also does not consider the role of
public clouds that may not be based upon openstack, but nonetheless
an infra environment of significance to the upper layers of the
"MANO" stack. (bryan_att,
15:53:42)
- discussion that face-to-face sessions maybe
needed to continue looking at the architecture from a different
angle (rpaik,
15:57:42)
- for Danube infographics LF team can take a
first cut at this and get feedback from the TSC (rpaik,
15:58:32)
- bryann_att encourages community members to
respond to intern's request for VNF catalog
(https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/014950.html)
(rpaik,
16:00:32)
Meeting ended at 16:01:10 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- rpaik to add E-release timeline discussion to the TSC agenda next week
Action items, by person
- rpaik
- rpaik to add E-release timeline discussion to the TSC agenda next week
People present (lines said)
- rpaik (34)
- tallgren (8)
- bryan_att (6)
- collabot` (4)
- hongbo88 (3)
- radez (2)
- rprakash (2)
- uli-k (2)
- dneary (1)
- Julien-zte (1)
- ChrisPriceAB (1)
- timirnich (1)
- rossella_s (1)
- edgarstp (1)
- fdegir (1)
- XavierCosta (1)
- jmorgan1 (1)
- bjskerry (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.