15:00:01 <tallgren> #startmeeting Weekly TSC meeting
15:00:01 <collabot`> Meeting started Tue Feb 28 15:00:01 2017 UTC.  The chair is tallgren. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:01 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
15:00:01 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_tsc_meeting'
15:00:12 <rpaik> #topic rollcall
15:00:21 <tallgren> #chair rpaik
15:00:21 <collabot`> Current chairs: rpaik tallgren
15:00:24 <hongbo99> #info Hongbo
15:00:25 <morgan_orange> #info Morgan Richomme
15:00:27 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
15:00:49 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper
15:00:54 <timirnich> #info Tim Irnich
15:01:04 <ashyoung> #info Ash Young (for Uli)
15:01:12 <tallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
15:01:13 <bjskerry> #info Brian Skerry
15:01:17 <jose_lausuch> #info Jose Lausuch
15:01:23 <bryan_att> #info Bryan Sullivan
15:01:34 <radez> #info Dan Radez (proxy Dave Neary)
15:01:59 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan
15:02:06 <bh526r> #info Bin Hu
15:02:11 <rpaik> we have a quorum
15:02:20 <rpaik> #topic approval of previous minutes
15:02:30 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
15:02:31 <rpaik> #info no comments on minutes thus approved
15:02:32 <rossella_s> #info Rossella Sblendido
15:02:39 <edgarstp> #info Edgar StPierre
15:02:55 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-February28,2017 agenda for today's call
15:03:58 <rpaik> #info no other agenda proposed
15:04:44 <rpaik> #topic on-going items
15:04:54 <bryan_att> #info rpaik: Aimee Ukasick is now PTL of Copper so please include her in quorum checks
15:05:07 <StuartMackie> #info Stuart Mackie
15:05:36 <rpaik> bryan_att the quorum is for TSC members (not PTLs)
15:06:04 <bryan_att> rpaik: PTLs are TSC members AFAIK
15:06:29 <Ceciliacorbi> #info
15:06:51 <jose_lausuch> bryan_att: not in my case :)
15:07:05 <frankbrockners> bryan_att: not all PTLs are TSC members
15:07:30 <bryan_att> frankbrockners: I thought we had changed that, but OK
15:07:30 <rpaik> #info reminder on project proposals for VINA/Bamboo/sampleVNF plus E-release naming survey
15:07:50 <Julien-zte> #info Julien
15:08:04 <rpaik> #info there's also an Etherpad for Dovetail
15:08:26 <rpaik> #topic Community Awards
15:08:42 <trevor_intel> #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Dovetail_Danube_Planning
15:09:04 <rpaik> #link https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-February/015246.html email discussion on awards
15:09:17 <tallgren> #info rpaik presented the proposal for community awards, moving from time-based awards to release based one
15:10:14 <tallgren> #info The categories are mostly the same: interns category and community support have been added
15:11:34 <morgan_orange> #agree
15:11:40 <rpaik> #agree on the new release-based award process
15:11:41 <ashyoung> #agree
15:11:48 <Julien-zte> #agree
15:12:00 <tallgren> #topic docs.opnfv.org update
15:12:16 <rpaik> #topic docs.opnfv.org update
15:12:41 <tallgren> #link docs.opnfv.org
15:14:03 <rpaik> #info Sofia discusses the migration to readthedocs and is looking for agreement on the Docs structure as can be found on docs.opnfv.org
15:15:27 <rpaik> #info also looking for feedback from the marketing team on the look & feel
15:18:02 <rpaik> #info project teams have been asked to restructure their repo's under /docs but the content should auto-populate in docs.opnfv.org
15:20:15 <rpaik> #info trevor_intel notes that the documentation should not be targeted for people that are already familiar with the project
15:22:04 <rpaik> #info discussion that it would make sense to divide the documentation for developers and users
15:25:59 <tallgren> #info #info Comment that the documentation page should use descriptive names like "functional testing" or "performance testing" instead of project names
15:26:08 <tallgren> #undo
15:26:08 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x1d12710>
15:26:17 <tallgren> #info Comment that the documentation page should use descriptive names like "functional testing" or "performance testing" instead of project names
15:27:20 <hongbo99> #link http://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/
15:29:21 <tallgren> #info frankbrockners points out that currently OPNFV is deployed with scenarios so it is difficult to structure the documentation
15:32:43 <rpaik> #info consensus to continue with the currently proposed docs structure for the Danube release but can visit other options such as a separate page for developer documentation
15:34:15 <rpaik> #info morgan_orange notes that testing groups docs are also under opnfvdocs
15:34:57 <rpaik> #topic OpenStack PTG readout
15:37:34 <rpaik> #info jose_lausuch summarizes Interop WG meetings in Atlanta where he had a chance to discuss NFV reference test cases with the OpenStack community
15:37:50 <bryan_att> #info I was there as well and have a couple of points to make also
15:40:11 <rpaik> #info jose_lausuch noted that having a developer focused events was helpful
15:41:23 <rpaik> #info bryan_att noted that OpenStack refstack didn't expand too much energy on "securing" the results
15:42:06 <tallgren> #info bryan_att pointed out that the OpenStack refstack includes features that are common in public OpenStack clouds but do not include all OPNFV features
15:43:01 <bryan_att> #info adoption across many public clouds is a gate for inclusion in refstack; we will need to extend it until the features that opnfv depends upon (e.g. Congress) get widely adopted
15:43:51 <rpaik> #action jose_lausuch to send out a summary note to mailing lists
15:43:54 <bryan_att> #info also they don't put too much emphasis on preventing gaming of the system - they think the SUT/distros will be inhibited from that
15:44:08 <rpaik> #topic Danube/E-release planning
15:45:41 <rpaik> #info dmcbride shares the data on MS6 compliance data
15:46:23 <rpaik> #info first requirement for MS6 is test case implementation (currently 9 projects have yet to report)
15:46:46 <bryan_att> #info also re the interop challenge, it was clear that we probably would not have time to stand up a real NFV interop challenge test, though the Open-O team indicated they would work one for Open-O (the issue is that the interop challenge occurs on-stage, and *must* work flawlessly across a set of OS distros - much emphasis on that)
15:47:18 <rpaik> #info 2nd MS6 requirement is preliminary documentation (11 projects have yet to report)
15:48:16 <rpaik> #info some projects do not have test case requirements (but need to have documentation)
15:48:50 <rpaik> #info dmcbride requests PTLs to send the latest if not done already
15:49:17 <rpaik> #action dmcbride to post his slides on the wiki
15:50:50 <rpaik> #info for E-release timeline, dmcbride notes that proposal is to maintain 2.0/3.0 releases and the details can be found in the mailing list
15:53:52 <rpaik> #action rpaik to add E-release timeline vote plus CI/CD evolution topics to the TSC call next week
15:56:43 <rpaik> #topic graduation reviews
15:57:37 <rpaik> #info tallgren notes that graduation reviews is another mechanism for community recognition
15:57:42 <dmcbride> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/E-River
15:58:05 <dmcbride> #info E-release schedule proposal ^^
16:00:41 <tallgren> #endmeeting