#opnfv-meeting: Weekly TSC meeting

Meeting started by tallgren at 13:59:22 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 13:59:45)
    2. hongbo (hongbo123456, 13:59:54)
    3. Bin Hu (bh526r, 14:00:31)
    4. Rossella Sblendido (rossella_s, 14:00:51)
    5. Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange, 14:01:13)
    6. Edgar StPierre (edgarstp, 14:01:25)
    7. Brian Skerry (bjskerry, 14:01:29)
    8. Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 14:01:31)
    9. Fatih Degirmenci (fdegir, 14:01:35)
    10. naga chumbalkar (naga_lenovo, 14:01:36)
    11. Uli (uli-k, 14:01:43)
    12. Dave Neary (dneary, 14:01:45)
    13. Jack Morgan (jmorgan1, 14:01:45)
    14. no comments on previous minutes, thus approved (rpaik, 14:02:31)
    15. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-March21,2017 today's agenda (rpaik, 14:02:54)
    16. Tim Irnich (timirnich, 14:03:03)
    17. no other topics suggested (rpaik, 14:03:07)
    18. Brady Johnson (ebrjohn, 14:03:21)
    19. rprakash (rprakash, 14:05:28)
    20. Xavier Costa (XavierCosta, 14:06:20)
    21. Kannan notes that the samplevnf project is to create a repository of sample VNFs to help VNF benchmarking and NFVi characterization with real world traffic (rpaik, 14:06:26)
    22. addressed questions from the community on Apache 2.0 licensing and all source code will be available (no binaries) on OPNFV repos (rpaik, 14:07:19)
    23. main goal is to help with VNF benchmarking and characterization (rpaik, 14:08:50)
    24. Julien (Julien-zte, 14:09:40)
    25. Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel, 14:12:17)
    26. The Sample VNFs will consist of several VMs and can be used for load testing the virtual infrastructure (tallgren, 14:12:46)
    27. also planning to look at service chaining in the future (rpaik, 14:14:25)
    28. The VNFs are data plane optimized and distributed (tallgren, 14:15:31)
    29. also plans for distributed instances in the future (rpaik, 14:17:04)
    30. VOTE: Voted on "does the TSC approve creation of the sampleVNF project?" Results are, +1: 12 (rpaik, 14:19:07)

  2. creation review for VINA (rpaik, 14:20:12)
    1. Koren notes that the VINA project addresses assurance and monitoring for VIM (rpaik, 14:20:54)
    2. focus will be on monitoring, visualization, monitoring, root cause analysis, etc. (rpaik, 14:22:57)
    3. Koren notes that VINA aims to take a top-down view (vs. other approaches taken e.g. by skydive) (rpaik, 14:28:34)
    4. VOTE: Voted on "does the TSC approve creation of the VINA projects?" Results are, +1: 10 (rpaik, 14:36:02)

  3. Danube planning and timeline (rpaik, 14:36:51)
    1. dmcbride notes that community is continuing to make progress on Danube 1.0, but a bit behind compared to the Colorado release (rpaik, 14:38:19)
    2. less than 1/2 of the Danube 1.0 target scenarios have been deployed (rpaik, 14:39:38)
    3. handful of scenarios are having successful Functest runs (rpaik, 14:40:06)
    4. few projects like onosfw, bottlenecks, etc. are still working through some issues (rpaik, 14:42:09)
    5. tallgren notes that we probably do not have sufficient information on making a decision on Danube 1.0 (rpaik, 14:44:04)
    6. morgan_orange notes that more time is needed for troubleshooting in general (rpaik, 14:46:27)
    7. also more time is needed on documentation (rpaik, 14:49:26)
    8. consensus to create a revised schedule/get well plan in the release meeting (rpaik, 14:53:15)

  4. ODL release timing (rpaik, 14:54:53)
    1. colindixon notes that release timing for ODL has not always worked with OPNFV and ODL community is considering twice a year release cycle (rpaik, 14:56:12)
    2. question to the OPNFV community is when is the ideal time for ODL to release? (rpaik, 14:57:28)
    3. ebrjohn says that he'd like to see a 3 month shift from ODL release to OPNFV release (colindixon, 14:59:59)
    4. discussion of aligning ODL with OpenStack release (rpaik, 15:00:13)
    5. colindixon and phrobb point out that the pushback on that is that it might incentivize shipping features in ODL SRs vs. waiting for the next release (colindixon, 15:00:26)
    6. there's some suggestions that ODL line up with OpenStack and then OPNFV come some time after that (colindixon, 15:01:03)


Meeting ended at 15:02:48 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. rpaik (33)
  2. tallgren (15)
  3. collabot` (13)
  4. dneary (9)
  5. ebrjohn (6)
  6. frankbrockners (4)
  7. colindixon (4)
  8. hongbo123456 (3)
  9. bjskerry (3)
  10. edgarstp (3)
  11. jmorgan1 (3)
  12. fdegir (3)
  13. morgan_orange (3)
  14. XavierCosta (3)
  15. uli-k (3)
  16. timirnich (3)
  17. rossella_s (3)
  18. Julien-zte (2)
  19. naga_lenovo (2)
  20. jose_lausuch (2)
  21. bh526r (1)
  22. trevor_intel (1)
  23. rprakash (1)
  24. bryan_att (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.