14:51:57 <dmcbride> #startmeeting TSC part 2
14:51:57 <collabot> Meeting started Tue May  2 14:51:57 2017 UTC.  The chair is dmcbride. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:51:57 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:51:57 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'tsc_part_2'
14:52:16 <dmcbride> #chair tallgren
14:52:16 <collabot> Current chairs: dmcbride tallgren
14:53:12 <dmcbride> #topic Creation Review NFVBench
14:54:26 <dmcbride> #info designed to run on production floor for measuring performance of NFVi
14:55:49 <dmcbride> #info runs traffic through a number of service chains, then provides feedback on network performance
14:56:11 <dmcbride> #info subset of benchmarks that you would see in VSPerf, for example
14:56:24 <dmcbride> #info designed to be easy to use
14:57:20 <jose_lausuch> If I'm not mistaken, yardstick also uses OpenStack API to create virtual resources and run traffic generators ..
14:58:09 <dmcbride> #info Frank describes the tool as a "first pass qualification" of stack
15:01:01 <dmcbride> #info Alec agrees with Hongbo that the project name does not perfectly describe the function.  However, the name has been broadly distributed, and would be difficult to change at this point.
15:01:30 <mbeierl> I don't think that is a good reason not to change the name.  It should match what it does
15:01:42 <jose_lausuch> can't we use the available tools or integrate with them to have a "first pass qualification" ?
15:02:35 <tallgren> #startvote Does the TSC approve the creation review for the NFVbench project? -1, 0, +1
15:02:35 <collabot> Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve the creation review for the NFVbench project? Valid vote options are -1, 0, +1.
15:02:35 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
15:02:55 <dneary> #vote +1
15:02:57 <tallgren> #vote +1
15:02:57 <mbeierl> #vote -1
15:03:05 <dneary> mbeierl, Why the -1?
15:03:05 <bjskerry> #vote +1
15:03:10 <StuartMackie> #vote +1
15:03:13 <timirnich> #vote 0
15:03:15 <mbeierl> I still think it need further investigation into leveraging the other projects
15:03:22 <cgoncalves> #vote 0
15:03:23 <ashyoung> #vote +1 for Frank Brockners
15:03:23 <collabot> ashyoung: +1 for Frank Brockners is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1.
15:03:26 <jmorgan1> #vote +1
15:03:32 <fdegir_> #vote 0
15:03:40 <hongbo753> #vote 0
15:03:57 <Julien-zte> #vote 0
15:03:57 <cgoncalves> I also share timirnich's comments
15:03:59 <rprakash> #vote +1 (Bin)
15:03:59 <collabot> rprakash: +1 (Bin) is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1.
15:04:05 <Julien-zte> suggest to have more discussion
15:04:06 <ChrisPriceAB> ashyoung do it again but without the comments.
15:04:07 <morgan_orange> #vote 0
15:04:10 <dmcbride> #info mbeierl says that the issue requires further investigation
15:04:28 <ashyoung> #vote +1
15:04:39 <rprakash> #vote 1
15:04:39 <collabot> rprakash: 1 is not a valid option. Valid options are -1, 0, +1.
15:04:42 * ChrisPriceAB can't keep his nose out of things...
15:04:52 <rprakash> #vote +1
15:04:54 <rossella_s> #vote 0
15:05:03 <tallgren> #endvote
15:05:03 <collabot> Voted on "Does the TSC approve the creation review for the NFVbench project?" Results are
15:05:03 <collabot> 0 (7): cgoncalves, timirnich, morgan_orange, Julien-zte, fdegir_, rossella_s, hongbo753
15:05:03 <collabot> +1 (7): dneary, ashyoung, tallgren, rprakash, StuartMackie, bjskerry, jmorgan1
15:05:03 <collabot> -1 (1): mbeierl
15:06:09 <tallgren> #endmeeting