12:59:16 <ttallgren> #startmeeting Weekly TSC meeting
12:59:16 <collabot> Meeting started Tue Aug 15 12:59:16 2017 UTC.  The chair is ttallgren. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
12:59:16 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
12:59:16 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_tsc_meeting'
12:59:21 <ttallgren> #chair rpaik
12:59:21 <collabot> Current chairs: rpaik ttallgren
12:59:30 <ttallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
12:59:37 <rpaik> #rollcall
12:59:43 <hongbo2580852> #info hongbo
12:59:44 <cgoncalves> #info Carlos Goncalves (proxy for Xavier Costa)
12:59:51 <juhak> #info Juha Kosonen (proxy for Morgan Richomme)
12:59:53 <ttallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
13:00:42 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
13:00:52 <bryan_att> #info Bryan Sullivan
13:01:15 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
13:01:30 <timirnich> #info Tim Irnich
13:02:04 <bh526r> #info Bin Hu
13:02:13 <Julien-zte> #info Julien
13:02:26 <rpaik> we now have a quorum
13:02:36 <Wenjing> #info Wenjing in for Uli
13:02:51 <rpaik> #topic approval of previous minutes
13:03:03 <rpaik> #info no comments on minutes thus approved
13:03:06 <fuqiao> #info fuqiao
13:03:12 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-August15,2017 today's agenda
13:03:21 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper
13:03:56 <rpaik> #info no other agenda topics suggested
13:04:06 <rpaik> #topic Auto project creation reivew
13:04:36 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12387216
13:04:59 <rpaik> #info new committers added for the project
13:06:23 <rpaik> #info frankbrockners notes that email addresses are needed for a couple of committers plus info on the PTL
13:11:54 <rpaik> #info bryan_att noted that f-release goals are outlined in the overall goal of the project
13:14:11 <rpaik> #info suggestion to add details for F-release as the project work begins
13:15:04 <rpaik> #startvote Does the TSC approve creation of the Auto project? (+1, 0, -1)
13:15:04 <collabot> Begin voting on: Does the TSC approve creation of the Auto project? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
13:15:04 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
13:15:12 <bryan_att> #vote +1
13:15:14 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:15:15 <juhak> #vote +1
13:15:17 <Julien-zte> #vote +1
13:15:18 <bh526r> #vote +1
13:15:19 <cgoncalves> #vote +1
13:15:20 <fdegir> #vote +1
13:15:23 <Wenjing> #vote +1
13:15:23 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
13:15:26 <hongbo2580852> #vote +1
13:15:26 <timirnich> #vote +1
13:15:27 <trevor_intel> #vote +1
13:15:45 <rpaik> #endvote
13:15:45 <collabot> Voted on "Does the TSC approve creation of the Auto project?" Results are
13:15:45 <collabot> +1 (12): juhak, frankbrockners, cgoncalves, trevor_intel, hongbo2580852, bryan_att, Julien-zte, timirnich, ttallgren, fdegir, Wenjing, bh526r
13:16:06 <rpaik> #info creation of the Auto project has been approved
13:16:35 <ttallgren> #topic OpenRetriever project name change
13:17:30 <rpaik> #link https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-July/017289.html email request for project name change
13:18:05 <rpaik> #info the proposal is to change the name of the project to Container4NFV
13:19:51 <rpaik> fuqiao can you hear us on gtm?
13:21:24 <ttallgren> #info bryan_att asks whether the project is focusing on containers in general, or containers in OpenStack
13:22:23 <bryan_att> #info there will likely be other projects addressing containers as a tool generically or in cloud-native VIM solutions, and changing the name on this project may imply too much scope for this project.
13:24:42 <fuqiao> @ray sorry, baby happens to cry just now... anything you need from me?
13:24:42 <collabot> fuqiao: Error: "ray" is not a valid command.
13:25:23 <rpaik> fuqiao no worries, question from bryan_att above on OpenRetriever
13:26:27 <fuqiao> Ok, me and xuan are from different departments. I can hardly help answer his question.
13:28:19 <rpaik> #info Xuan Jia notes that focus has been on k8s on bare metal  (not OpenStack specific)
13:31:56 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve the project name change from OpenRetriever to Container4NFV? (+1, 0, -1)
13:31:56 <collabot> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve the project name change from OpenRetriever to Container4NFV? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
13:31:56 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
13:32:10 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:32:11 <Julien-zte> #vote +1
13:32:12 <cgoncalves> #vote +1
13:32:13 <timirnich> #vote +1
13:32:14 <juhak> #vote +1
13:32:15 <bh526r> #vote +1
13:32:15 <Wenjing> #vote +1
13:32:16 <hongbo2580852> #vote +1
13:32:18 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
13:32:22 <fdegir> #vote -1
13:32:31 <trevor_intel> #vote +1
13:32:36 <rpaik> #endvote
13:32:36 <collabot> Voted on "does the TSC approve the project name change from OpenRetriever to Container4NFV?" Results are
13:32:36 <collabot> +1 (10): juhak, frankbrockners, bh526r, trevor_intel, timirnich, Julien-zte, hongbo2580852, ttallgren, Wenjing, cgoncalves
13:32:36 <collabot> -1 (1): fdegir
13:32:37 <fuqiao> #vote +1
13:32:55 <rpaik> #info name change approved to Container4NFV
13:33:05 <bryan_att> #info We need to ensure that project name changes don't inadvertently contribute to difficulty getting approval for later projects under the same technical area - e.g. as today we have distinct projects for OpenStack-based VIM platforms.
13:33:20 <rpaik> #topic LF  IT/Infra update
13:33:31 <ttallgren> #info No updates on IT side
13:33:34 <rpaik> #info no planned IT maintenance
13:33:47 <rpaik> #topic Euphrates update
13:35:51 <rpaik> #info additional 2 weeks seems to have helped most project teams
13:36:18 <rpaik> #info received exception requests from 3 projects and have not heard from one (OVNO)
13:38:28 <frankbrockners> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Euphrates+Milestone+Exception+Request+for+Calipso+Project+for+Milestone%28s%29%3A+MS5
13:43:09 <rpaik> #info there were also a few items that were caught on security scans that are being fixed and progress are being made in general with the Apex team and expect to have work completed by Aug. 25th
13:46:11 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Calipso? (+1, 0, -1)
13:46:11 <collabot> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Calipso? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
13:46:11 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
13:46:12 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:46:14 <fdegir> #vote +1
13:46:15 <bryan_att> #vote +1
13:46:15 <Wenjing> #vote +1
13:46:16 <cgoncalves> #vote +1
13:46:17 <hongbo2580852> #vote +1
13:46:18 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
13:46:18 <juhak> #vote +1
13:46:19 <timirnich> #vote +1
13:46:20 <Julien-zte> #vote +1
13:46:23 <bh526r> #vote +1
13:46:36 <rpaik> #endvote
13:46:36 <collabot> Voted on "does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Calipso?" Results are
13:46:36 <collabot> +1 (11): juhak, frankbrockners, cgoncalves, hongbo2580852, fdegir, Julien-zte, timirnich, ttallgren, bh526r, bryan_att, Wenjing
13:46:49 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Euphrates+Milestone+Exception+Request+for+FDS+Project+for+Milestone%28s%29%3A+MS5
13:48:35 <rpaik> #info frankbrockners notes that integration with ODL master is close to being resolved
13:49:27 <rpaik> #info request is to merge MS5 & MS6
13:49:44 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:49:53 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for FDS? (+1, 0, -1)
13:49:53 <collabot> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for FDS? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
13:49:53 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
13:49:56 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:49:56 <bryan_att> #vote +1
13:49:57 <cgoncalves> #vote +1
13:49:57 <fdegir> #vote +1
13:49:57 <Wenjing> #vote +1
13:49:58 <juhak> #vote +1
13:49:58 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
13:50:00 <timirnich> #vote +1
13:50:00 <Julien-zte> #vote +1
13:50:04 <bh526r> #vote +1
13:50:11 <rpaik> #endvote
13:50:11 <collabot> Voted on "does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for FDS?" Results are
13:50:11 <collabot> +1 (10): juhak, frankbrockners, cgoncalves, timirnich, bryan_att, Julien-zte, ttallgren, bh526r, fdegir, Wenjing
13:50:38 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Euphrates+Milestone+Exception+Request+for+Armband+Project+for+Milestone%28s%29%3A+MS5
13:52:50 <rpaik> #info still working on bare metal deployment for MCP (both Arm and x86) and they factored in 3 days of buffer for the work
13:53:40 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Armband? (+1, 0, -1)
13:53:40 <collabot> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Armband? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
13:53:40 <collabot> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
13:53:42 <fdegir> #vote +1
13:53:43 <ttallgren> #vote +1
13:53:44 <juhak> #vote +1
13:53:46 <Wenjing> #vote +1
13:53:46 <hongbo2580852> #vote  +1
13:53:50 <bryan_att> #vote +1
13:53:53 <timirnich> #vote +1
13:53:54 <cgoncalves> #vote +1
13:53:57 <trevor_intel> #vote +1
13:53:58 <bh526r> #vote +1
13:54:00 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
13:54:12 <rpaik> #endvote
13:54:12 <collabot> Voted on "does the TSC approve the MS5 exception request for Armband?" Results are
13:54:12 <collabot> +1 (11): juhak, trevor_intel, cgoncalves, frankbrockners, hongbo2580852, fdegir, timirnich, ttallgren, bh526r, bryan_att, Wenjing
13:55:02 <rpaik> #topic inactive committers
13:56:54 <rpaik> #info rpaik will be reaching out to PTLs with committers that have not been active for >6 months
13:57:27 <ttallgren> #endmeeting