13:58:14 #startmeeting OPNFV TSC 13:58:14 Meeting started Tue Mar 5 13:58:14 2019 UTC. The chair is dmcbride. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:58:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:58:14 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_tsc' 13:58:33 #topic roll call 13:58:56 #info David McBride proxy for Bin Hu 13:59:48 #info Gabriel Yu 14:00:23 #info Mark Beierl 14:00:48 #info Rex Lee 14:01:35 #info Jack Morgan 14:01:59 #info Cédric Ollivier 14:02:04 #info fuqiao 14:02:05 #info Frank Brockners 14:02:09 #info Manuel Buil 14:02:10 #info Trevor Bramwell 14:04:16 #info Georg Kunz 14:07:46 #topic approval of minutes 14:07:58 #info no comments - minutes approved 14:10:26 #info Trevor Cooper 14:12:31 #topic CoC refresher 14:13:25 #info Heather leads us through the CoC 14:14:13 #info mbuil asks about LFN CoC. Heather says that it does not currently exist, but could be put in place if the community would like to do that. 14:17:24 Question: what happened to Compass4NFV and Daisy4NFV? 14:30:48 #topic OPNFV installer status and implications for OVP 14:32:23 #info ollivier mentions functest also doesn't rely on an opnfv installer and has acheived gating solution 14:33:51 #info mbeierl suggests that LFN and opnfv define what an opnfv platform is without an opnfv installer 14:36:41 #info fdegir talks to current status of XCI and mentions it supports baremetal since fall last year 14:40:49 #info Need to clarify project status of XCI. jmorgan1 says that a similar situation exists for LaaS. 14:43:35 #info mbeierl asks if XCI needs to be its own project, instead of a sub-project of releng as it is now 14:44:42 #Info XCI needs to have more visibility in the wiki. When going to wiki.opnfv.org, the projects page is the first seen. XCI does not get mentioned under any of the Projects lists. 14:45:55 mbeierl: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Continuous+Integration 14:46:39 jmorgan1: but that is under Infrastructure, which requires someone to know to look there. When going to https://wiki.opnfv.org, the user is presented with projects, and XCI is not visible from there 14:47:01 that is really my concern - it is not visible like the other projects are 14:47:18 and if one goes to the releng project under Projects, also there is no linkage 14:47:24 mbeierl: i don't disagree, just pointing you to the current wiki docs location 14:47:32 thanks 14:47:51 mbeierl: what would you like to see about XCI, I can take a task to document it better :) 14:48:38 My preference would be to have a main wiki page for it, like the other projects, to make it appear to be "at the same level" as the other projects 14:49:00 mbeierl: and explain how it can be used? 14:49:21 Yes, that would need to be included in the page too :) 14:49:28 thanks, mbuil 14:50:13 mbeierl: I could also try to explain in general how the infra is deployed (both VM and baremetal) and then how it deploys openstack and k8s 14:50:14 This comes back to the idea: LFN and opnfv define what an opnfv platform is without an opnfv installer 14:51:09 I think that XCI is the equivalent to an installer. Whether or not testing projects use it to verify themselves is a different topic 14:54:21 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Improving+CI+for+Test+Projects 15:00:25 mbeierl: re: docs - I believe most of the docs are outside the wiki - https://docs.opnfv.org/en/latest/infrastructure/xci.html I agree we could definitely improve visibility to the project from the wiki. 15:00:51 * frankbrockners needs to drop 15:00:59 #info Original mandate was for TSC to sign off on the change of the OVP scope 15:03:16 bramwelt: This was the page I hit when searching:https://opnfv-releng-xci.readthedocs.io/en/latest/specs/infra_manager.html and the date was what threw me off :( 15:05:30 #endmeeting