#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV internship proposal project review

Meeting summary

1. 1. Mark Beierl (mbeierl, 20:05:42)
   
   
2. roll call (dmcbride, 20:05:49)
   1. David McBride (dmcbride, 20:05:54)
   2. Heather Kirksey (dmcbride, 20:06:04)
   
   
3. what do we want from internship proposals? (dmcbride, 20:06:45)
   1. mbeierl says that the project tasks should be measurable (dmcbride, 20:07:56)
   2. the project should be well defined so that we can easily understand what the outcome should be (dmcbride, 20:08:56)
   3. Bin Hu in attendance (mbeierl, 20:18:57)
   4. Bin suggests we look at what category - infra / testing / feature - the project is part of (mbeierl, 20:19:25)
   5. We should also ask if certain areas such as CNI should be weighted more - should get feedback from TSC (mbeierl, 20:20:01)
   6. - process will be to review each one independently and then provide ranking (mbeierl, 20:25:26)
   7. consensus that bottlenecks proposal seems very ambitious (dmcbride, 20:28:57)
   8. mbeierl suggests feedback to author asking whether data is available (dmcbride, 20:29:28)
   
   
4. stack ranking (dmcbride, 20:36:46)
   1. 1) HA; 2) VSPerf; 3) Bottlenecks (dmcbride, 20:37:18)
   2. dmcbride will present ranking to the TSC and Bin will provide feedback to Gabriel about Bottlenecks proposal (dmcbride, 20:40:28)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. dmcbride (14)
2. mbeierl (5)
3. collabot (4)