===============================================
#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion 146
===============================================


Meeting started by bh526r at 13:00:07 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2019/opnfv-meeting.2019-07-29-13.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Roll Call  (bh526r, 13:00:16)
  * Bin Hu  (bh526r, 13:00:22)
  * Manuel Buil  (mbuil, 13:02:33)
  * David McBride  (bh526r, 13:03:33)
  * Pierre Lynch  (bh526r, 13:03:47)
  * Trevor Cooper  (trevor_intel, 13:03:50)
  * Mark Beierl  (bh526r, 13:05:16)
  * Sridhar Rao  (bh526r, 13:05:37)

* LFN Strategic Planning Committee Questionnaire  (bh526r, 13:08:03)
  * LINK: https://lists.opnfv.org/g/opnfv-tsc/message/5397  (bh526r,
    13:08:23)
  * The above is email from Trevor Cooper  (bh526r, 13:08:49)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/2019+Goals+-+LFN+SPC
    (trevor_intel, 13:09:00)
  * Sunku Ranganath  (bh526r, 13:09:43)
  * Trevor introduced process of collecting input  (bh526r, 13:21:48)
  * David asked how it went in other communities to collect responses to
    questionnaire  (bh526r, 13:22:36)
  * Trevor is unsure. Trevor will ask in next SPC meeting  (bh526r,
    13:23:00)
  * Manuel asked if SPC decides budget for next year  (bh526r, 13:23:25)
  * Unsure  (bh526r, 13:23:31)
  * Manuel has lots of issues regarding the 1st question "How would you
    like the SPC to interact with your project?".  (bh526r, 13:25:37)
  * David echoed Manuel's concern. It's worthwhile to remind people what
    is mission and mandate of SPC. Otherwise, it is difficult for people
    to address those questions.  (bh526r, 13:26:37)
  * A better approach is for SPC to draw 3 or 4 options of how it
    expects to interact. So the question will be a multiple choice
    instead of free response  (bh526r, 13:27:37)
  * Trevor indicated that there were lots of different opinions in SPC.
    (bh526r, 13:28:29)
  * Manuel asked if the answer could be "we would like to have a monthly
    report to SPC for status update"  (bh526r, 13:28:59)
  * Trevor responded "yes, absolutely"  (bh526r, 13:29:24)
  * Georg Kunz  (bh526r, 13:31:07)
  * Mark Beierl also indicated that it is difficult to answer those
    questions. David suggested that maybe we should move the 1st
    question to the end, because it is an open-ended question.  (bh526r,
    13:36:30)
  * David also suggested to summarize what SPC and its mission is in a
    few bullet points so that people will know what SPC is  (bh526r,
    13:38:01)
  * Mark said that we understand it is top down v.s. bottom up. Perhaps
    a better way is to start with top down.  (bh526r, 13:39:24)
  * So SPC can prepare some kinds of top down strategy, and we can
    respond.  (bh526r, 13:39:53)
  * Representatives from different LFN projects have quite different
    views  (bh526r, 13:40:40)
  * Trevor summarized that the questionnaire needs to be better written
    so that we can respond  (bh526r, 13:45:20)
  * David further suggested that SPC should lay out a few options as
    multiple choice question  (bh526r, 13:48:01)
  * eg monthly meetings, email updates, some choices maybe frequencies
    (bh526r, 13:48:30)
  * Sridhar said he was confused what to take to SPC, and what to take
    to TSC  (bh526r, 13:55:13)
  * ACTION: Trevor will give feedback to SPC regarding 2 suggestions (1)
    a few bullet points of what SPC and its mission is; (2) If possible,
    turn those questions into multiple choice questions, perhaps the
    last options can be always "Other. Please specify".  (bh526r,
    14:04:04)

* AOB  (bh526r, 14:04:11)
  * Meeting adjourned  (bh526r, 14:04:22)



Meeting ended at 14:04:26 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* bh526r (36)
* collabot` (3)
* trevor_intel (2)
* mbuil (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4