===================================================== #opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discuss Meeting #174 ===================================================== Meeting started by jentoio at 12:58:36 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2020/opnfv-meeting.2020-05-11-12.58.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (jentoio, 12:58:44) * Jack Morgan (jentoio, 12:58:48) * Fu Qiao (jentoio, 12:59:34) * Al Morton (jentoio, 13:00:53) * Sridhar rao (jentoio, 13:03:21) * Anusha (jentoio, 13:04:16) * Jim Baker (jentoio, 13:05:42) * Common Infrastructure Realization & Validation (CIRV) project (jentoio, 13:06:27) * Sridhar shared an update from last weeks meeting with CNTT (jentoio, 13:06:53) * Al Morton (acmacm, 13:07:32) * shared about cookbook status and that each OPNFV project should take ownership ofdocumentation (jentoio, 13:08:42) * Chandrasekaran (jentoio, 13:09:40) * Parth Yadav (jentoio, 13:09:58) * CNTT just to keep the requirements in their documentation and have OPNFV projects drive documentation within OPNFV (jentoio, 13:12:13) * CNTT RI/RC meeting will create proposal on a way forward (jentoio, 13:15:04) * "some chapters are just copied from OPNFV" ? (acmacm, 13:15:13) * Georg Kunz (georgk, 13:15:57) * Jim shares that CNTT that are working on figuring out how to move forward from CNTT documentation / requirements to implementation within OPNFV project (jentoio, 13:20:21) * some of the details on how to go about doing that is still being worked out as Jack asks about how this might be done (jentoio, 13:21:49) * Al /Fu Qiao discuss a specific example PDF_2.0/HDV as a requirement to implementation (jentoio, 13:29:09) * CIRV project mandate appears to have gaps between current plan and how or what changes need to be made (jentoio, 13:31:40) * Al mentions that current committer/contributer list seems to have lots of people but not a lot of work is getting done (jentoio, 13:33:34) * Sridhar mentions perhaps CIRV can have a regular meeting to address these concerns (jentoio, 13:35:14) * Fu Qiao asks why we are having this discussion on CIRV, Jack mentions that their is a gap between the project mandate and actual current plan (jentoio, 13:40:09) * Fu Qiao suggest that we need to figure out how to migrate CNTT RI/RC to OPNFV first, then CIRV can re-evaluate its manadate (jentoio, 13:42:02) * Virtual Developer & Testing Form (jentoio, 13:47:56) * event is June 22-25, project proposals are due June 3rd and today we are wanting to discuss what joint topics we want to have (jentoio, 13:49:58) * What topics do we want to have a joint presentation with CNTT/OPNFV? (jentoio, 13:50:47) * from of the OPNFV 2.0 meeting a few topics came up... (jentoio, 13:53:44) * CIRV RI/RC Scope and Interaction (jentoio, 13:53:49) * OPNFV / CNTT Release Processes _&_ Cadence (jentoio, 13:54:02) * Industry adoption - Badging (jentoio, 13:56:03) * Thanks Jack! (acmacm, 14:04:28) Meeting ended at 14:04:39 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * jentoio (33) * collab-meetbot (3) * acmacm (3) * georgk (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4