==================================== #opnfv-meeting: OPNFV TSC 2020-11-03 ==================================== Meeting started by frankbrockners at 14:01:11 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2020/opnfv_tsc_2020_11_03/opnfv-meeting-opnfv_tsc_2020_11_03.2020-11-03-14.01.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * rollcall (frankbrockners, 14:01:50) * fuqiao (fuqiao, 14:03:16) * Emma Foley (efoley, 14:03:37) * Al Morton (acmacm, 14:03:40) * Georg Kunz (efoley, 14:03:48) * Sridhar Rao (SRao, 14:03:49) * Mark Beierl (mbeierl, 14:05:03) * Trevor Cooper (frankbrockners, 14:05:41) * we're at quorum (frankbrockners, 14:05:55) * agenda bashing (frankbrockners, 14:06:02) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/OPNFV+TSC+Meeting+2020-11-03 (frankbrockners, 14:06:30) * AGREED: agenda agreed (frankbrockners, 14:07:12) * approval of last week's minutes (frankbrockners, 14:07:23) * AGREED: minutes of Oct-27 are approved (frankbrockners, 14:07:33) * OPNFV JERMA Release (frankbrockners, 14:07:49) * sunkuranganath (sunkuranganath, 14:08:17) * RC0 is today - compliance to RC0 milestone is "limited" (frankbrockners, 14:09:39) * LINK: https://jira.opnfv.org/issues/?filter=13104 (dmcbride, 14:10:28) * https://jira.opnfv.org/issues/?filter=13104 list of open issues for Jerma (frankbrockners, 14:10:55) * Reminder: R0 is the start of integration testing, RC1 is the first release candidate (frankbrockners, 14:11:14) * LINK: https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/OU3PqkjP/jerma%20status.png (frankbrockners, 14:18:20) * Stor4NFV has not responded to any questions wrt/ release status. Suggestion by David is to exclude Stor4NFV from Jerma (frankbrockners, 14:19:22) * Key issues listed in the screenshot above. One key question is "what do we release" for Jerma (i.e. which artefacts) (frankbrockners, 14:20:55) * Question to David: What does the "create project test plan mean?" -> Answer: As part of the project plan, each project was asked to define a test strategy. The testplan implements the test strategy. (frankbrockners, 14:26:27) * proposal: Slip RC0 based on limited readiness by 1 week (frankbrockners, 14:26:51) * AGREED: TSC agrees to move RC0 to Nov/10 (frankbrockners, 14:27:12) * 2 teams are working on getting the integration platform in place this week (frankbrockners, 14:28:13) * team setup for integration team is being discussed as part of the release meeting (-> consider joining the release meeting) (frankbrockners, 14:32:23) * Question: When projects follow the self-release process, should their artefacts be included in the release moving forward? -> Something for future discussion (frankbrockners, 14:33:25) * The next tech discuss meeting (next Monday, 14:00 UTC) will discuss the manifest for the release (i.e. what is included) (frankbrockners, 14:34:15) * MELD Topics and status updates (frankbrockners, 14:34:30) * Tool chain and tool change (i.e. even the current tools might be used differently in the new organization) (frankbrockners, 14:35:49) * Tooling likely a topic for the interim TSC (frankbrockners, 14:36:56) * Release naming deferred to interim TSC (frankbrockners, 14:38:21) * there is a proposal for an interim TSC: 15 members, 8 from current OPNFV TSC (frankbrockners, 14:38:46) * TBD what artefacts Anuket will release. There will be reference specs, there will be verification/certification; mbeierl suggests that those always go in synch. (frankbrockners, 14:41:04) * Reference Implementation: The number of reference implementations seems to be an open topic (is there one or multiple?) (frankbrockners, 14:41:43) * Discussion: Should there be a reference implementation and "vendor implementations"? -> Topic to be resolved by the Anuket TSC. (frankbrockners, 14:43:07) * Key question is what Anuket would release (frankbrockners, 14:43:27) * Trever Cooper mentions that OPNFV has a lot of experience with the topic - and the fact that it is hard to create *one* reference implementation which would represent *the* platform (frankbrockners, 14:45:01) * Implementation would mostly be a vehicle to define a test suite (frankbrockners, 14:45:35) * Cedric mentions that we should not link testing and implementation - because we will and should have multiple implementations (frankbrockners, 14:46:34) * Interim TSC election calendar: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/MZ/MeldOps+2020-10-29+Meeting+notes (frankbrockners, 14:49:18) * For the meld, the OPNFV community will select 8 out of the current 12 TSC members for the new Anuket TSC (frankbrockners, 14:50:07) * Interim TSC will have a 9 month term (frankbrockners, 14:51:34) * AGREED: OPNFV TSC agrees the TSC election calendar (frankbrockners, 14:56:57) * Gitlab Pilot (frankbrockners, 14:57:43) * Tech Discuss meeting (on Nov/2) reviewed the gitlab pilot (frankbrockners, 14:58:37) * One topic discussed was concurrent changes (e.g. a name change across the various efforts within the Storperf project) - and see how well that works (frankbrockners, 14:59:58) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=~mbeierl&title=GitLab+and+StorPerf (frankbrockners, 15:00:47) * We'll come back to the topic next week (frankbrockners, 15:02:01) * Infra updates (frankbrockners, 15:02:07) * no updates from LF infra (frankbrockners, 15:02:17) Meeting ended at 15:02:20 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * frankbrockners (50) * collab-meetbot (9) * efoley (2) * acmacm (1) * mbeierl (1) * fuqiao (1) * SRao (1) * sunkuranganath (1) * dmcbride (1) * jentoio (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4