15:00:49 #startmeeting OPNFV Pharos 15:00:50 Meeting started Wed Oct 21 15:00:49 2015 UTC. The chair is trevor_intel. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:50 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_pharos' 15:01:16 #info Trevor (Intel lab) 15:01:20 #info Fatih Degirmenci 15:01:24 #info Narinder Gupta 15:01:45 #info Michael Wynne - Intel Lab 15:02:09 #Agenda  1) MAAS 2) Templates 3) LF lab 4) Allocation and mapping of lab resources 15:02:27 Agenda comments? 15:02:42 #info Agenda  1) MAAS 2) Templates 3) LF lab 4) Allocation and mapping of lab resources 15:03:43 #topic MAAS 15:03:58 regarding MAAS i have clear the MAAS description in JIRA for POC. And we have mutiple regional controllers now in different labs. 15:04:11 narindergupta: CAn you give an update, ready for the demo tomorrow? 15:04:32 yes we are ready for demo tomorrow. 15:04:40 narindergupta: ok great 15:04:56 i am doing last minute scription to consolidated view of regional controller though. 15:05:27 narindergupta: Will you present some slides ... it will be teh first time some people hear about MAAS 15:05:28 what we will demo is mentioned in the jira MAAS POC description. 15:06:01 narindergupta: is it possible to record the demo and publish it somewhere? 15:06:09 * fdegir will miss the demo due to travel 15:06:10 narindergupta: I think you need to start with high level description of what MAAS is and objectives of teh PoC 15:06:12 yes i will prepare some slides about maas and present it. But i need to put on ubuntudemo.com as webex does not do well 15:06:15 on ubuntu 15:06:40 narindergupta: Yes I can record it and publish on OPNFV Youtube channel ... please remind me at teh beginning 15:06:50 fdegir: if someone can help me in recording then yes we can do that 15:07:00 fdegir: that is too bad 15:07:32 narindergupta: We use GoTo meeting 15:07:39 I might watch from my phone in the airport 15:07:52 I think gotomeeting meetings can be recorded 15:08:10 fdegir: yes they can I know how to do it 15:08:19 fdegir: goto meeting also have issue in sharing my desktop with ubuntu 15:08:19 thx trevor_intel 15:08:53 that's also true; gotomeeting linux client is limited in functionality 15:08:55 trevor_intel: can u send me meeting invite so i can test it before hand and let you know 15:09:27 i can show my desktop using http://demoubuntu.com/narindergupta 15:09:36 Where I can get GTM info? 15:09:49 narindergupta: I just sent it 15:09:53 I don't see dialing info in meeting invite or pharos meeting page 15:09:55 thanks 15:10:29 #info meeting logistics https://wiki.opnfv.org/meetings/test 15:11:16 Anything to disuss about MAAS today? 15:12:12 Will take that as no ... so we will wait for the demo :) 15:12:29 #topic Templates 15:12:49 #Info Is there anyone from Orange who can update on templates? 15:13:37 #Info Nobody available 15:14:50 I will ping Morgan again to see if he has latest 15:15:14 #topic Allocation of lab resources 15:16:13 Thansk to fdegir we have a good set of data from labs 15:16:32 fdegir: How did Cable labs respond? 15:16:46 Are they going to proivde resources? 15:16:48 trevor_intel: they answered the survey 15:16:56 and they say they have the resources 15:17:13 but I'm not sure what it means when they say they have resources 15:17:21 I haven't heard anyone using cable labs resources 15:17:42 they plan to provide more 15:17:58 but again, we need to see what current resources they claim to have 15:18:09 I think we need to put up detailed information about each lab on teh Wiki to make it clear ... agree? 15:18:14 yes 15:18:37 no/type of current and future resources 15:18:39 fdegir: Can you send me the detailed responses? 15:18:41 current allocation 15:19:26 it is here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-CYC35WH2/ 15:19:44 if you click individual responses, you will see the details answers 15:19:51 detailed 15:20:08 fdegir: Hmm I tried that already ... maybe I was doign it wrong 15:20:17 do you see it now? 15:20:22 trying now 15:21:34 E.g. Q2 ... I can't see which labs answered yes, only that 8 did 15:22:34 but you can see individual responses? 15:22:59 you need to go through individual responses to see which labs answered yes for Q2 15:23:02 No ... only where they wrote text 15:23:54 do you see this link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-CYC35WH2/browse/ 15:24:26 Yes I can see that 15:25:02 Ok I see the issue ... sorry I am slow 15:25:03 that's the one we need to go through to see who answered yes to which question 15:25:08 np 15:25:26 this is due to using free account 15:25:44 Yes I was clicking on responses in the summary 15:26:16 Ok ... next step is to put up a detaled status of each lab on Wiki (with current usage) 15:26:23 yep 15:26:23 Agree? 15:26:29 +1 15:26:53 I will do it. I have been sick this week :( 15:27:36 me too 15:27:41 working from home 15:27:45 me too 15:28:40 #action Trevor update https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_labs with detiled status of community labs 15:29:05 #info Requirements for Phaors labs https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_spec?&#test_lab_requirements 15:29:33 Please review the page if not already and edit/comments 15:30:22 I think I did that 15:30:29 will take a look at it again 15:31:01 Planning for release testing is an issue ... LF will not be able to handle all teh features 15:31:55 This means community labs will have to be part of testing for the release 15:32:31 I think certain labs will have to be "certified" for testing the release 15:33:52 yes 15:33:53 #info Cross Matrix Test projects versus Pharos labs https://wiki.opnfv.org/feature_test_project_matrix 15:34:02 about that table 15:34:15 yes needs to be build out 15:34:16 standalone servers and full pods mixed on the table 15:34:32 agree its a start ... 15:34:35 yes 15:34:52 so we can perhaps classify testing in 2 categories 15:35:17 the first one could be "OPNFV Reference Platform Testing" running against OPNFV deployed on a pharos compliant lab/pod 15:35:25 Was thinking we need to map FEATURES against test resources 15:35:25 1 table for this 15:35:45 ok and 2nd? 15:36:05 the 2nd is mixed between standalone testing activities and perhaps the feature type of testing 15:36:38 cause the projects first need to do their testing in limited scope for development purposes 15:36:52 and once they get integrated to OPNFV and installed during the deployment 15:36:57 then they can be tested in that scope 15:37:48 what I'm trying to say is 15:37:53 For 2nd ... isn't that up to the project ... do we need to track it? They will test in their Dev environment? 15:37:55 we need to have default configuration 15:38:03 like what we had for arno 15:38:08 openstack + odl 15:38:20 and once onos becomes ready 15:38:34 openstack + onos is another combination to test 15:38:51 about the 2nd 15:39:11 if I'm not mistaken, I've seen project specific testing activities in that test table 15:39:21 Agree for each combination we need reference environments and map features to be tested against that 15:40:03 but if we go back to your original question 15:40:18 "certified" labs for testing 15:40:30 we definitely need to do that 15:40:49 Table one is Rls B features against "certified" test resources 15:41:25 Each feature should have pass/fail criteria 15:41:45 yes 15:41:52 For release to happen all features shoudl report success 15:41:54 like KVM is tested using yardstick on intel lab 15:41:58 we miss that mapping 15:42:08 we map yardstick to intel and kvm to yardstick 15:42:18 it is not missing 15:42:23 but needs 2 hops 15:42:33 ok got it I think 15:42:58 But that is table one. What aout table two? 15:43:43 that is a bit confusing tbh 15:43:52 ... the 2nd is mixed between standalone testing activities and perhaps the feature type of testing 15:43:56 yes 15:44:01 that's what I was going to ask 15:44:23 because we have feature projects and test projects there together 15:46:13 The seond table could be project vs lab resources for Dev? 15:46:36 Dev and standalone testing 15:47:37 yes 15:47:54 We need all the project survey responses for tabel 2 15:48:33 8 projects responded 15:49:30 We need more 15:49:52 Will have to keep pushing 15:50:37 have you seen my mail regarding creating tasks for all projects in jira? 15:51:33 For lab resources? Today? 15:52:17 Just foudn it 15:52:22 found it 15:52:59 fdegir: looks good I will rspond today 15:53:17 #topic LF resources 15:53:36 fdegir: Thansk for creating the page on LF usage 15:54:01 np 15:54:04 #info LF lab usage https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos/lf_lab 15:55:16 should we ask those people what they do on LF lab? 15:55:34 yes what I was about to say too 15:56:06 I will ask, haven't done it yet 15:56:11 ok 15:57:07 I have a hard stop now 15:57:26 Will have to end the meeting 15:58:02 #endmeeting