16:00:41 <trevor_intel1> #startmeeting OPNFV Pharos
16:00:41 <collabot> Meeting started Wed Feb 10 16:00:41 2016 UTC.  The chair is trevor_intel1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:41 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
16:00:41 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_pharos'
16:00:57 <trevor_intel1> #info Trevor Cooper (Intel)
16:01:27 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan
16:01:30 <trevor_intel1> #topic POD status
16:01:45 <serverascode> #info Curtis Collicutt
16:02:16 <trevor_intel1> Hi Jack ... Morgan said he sent his gpg keys this morning
16:02:49 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: yes
16:03:12 <trevor_intel1> great did you send the credentials yet?
16:03:17 <narindergupta> #info narinder gupta
16:03:20 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: yes
16:03:30 <trevor_intel1> Jack: thanks
16:03:42 <trevor_intel1> Hi Curtis
16:03:55 <trevor_intel1> Can you introduce yourself?
16:04:40 <serverascode> sure, openstack operator since essex, working on nfv related openstack projects at work, we are building a pharos-like lab, just trying to figure out how to help with opnfv
16:06:26 <trevor_intel1> serverascode: And your company, can you tell us a little about what you are interested in OPNFV?
16:06:50 <trevor_intel1> serverascode: and welcome ")
16:06:53 <trevor_intel1> :)
16:07:53 <trevor_intel1> Lets go through open Jira items for PODs
16:09:21 <trevor_intel1> #info Still some outstanding requests for POD access but Jack is waiting on requestors for gpg keys
16:09:26 <serverascode> (we're interested to get used to nfv related work especially around openstack and model some nfv infrastructure using open source, ala opnfv, typically we help telcos deploy new technology)
16:09:33 <trevor_intel1> Jack: ok, agree with that?
16:09:54 <trevor_intel1> serverascode: sounds great
16:11:05 <trevor_intel1> Jack: Can we close https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/PHAROS-105?
16:12:33 <trevor_intel1> https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/PHAROS-89 waiting on gpg keys
16:13:20 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: waiting on gpg keys is PHAROS-89, PHAROS-92, PHAROS-102
16:14:21 <jmorgan1> PHAROS-88, waiting on Compass team to tell me how many additional tagged vlan they need (but it's Chineese new year)
16:14:26 <trevor_intel1> Jack: ok, may need to send an email reminder (some people are drowing in Jira emails)
16:15:05 <trevor_intel1> serverascode: Will you be a the the hackfest next month?
16:15:10 <jmorgan1> PHAROS-90, is Apex team moving from Intel POD 2 to Intel POD 7
16:15:40 <trevor_intel1> radez: ping
16:16:04 <radez> trevor_intel1: pong
16:16:10 <serverascode> trevor_intel1: not as of now, but that's a possibility, didn't know about it will look into it
16:16:50 <trevor_intel1> radez: All good with POD 7?
16:17:45 <jmorgan1> I need to schedule down time for Intel POD 4,5,6 so I can migrate them env117
16:18:05 <radez> trevor_intel1: so far, havn't deployed successfully, but I think it's implimentaiton specific. I don't have alot of cycles doing the BM deploys so I'm learning some in the process
16:18:16 <radez> I'll be in touch if I need some help
16:18:37 <trevor_intel1> radez: Can we close https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/PHAROS-90
16:18:49 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: thanks let me know your plan so i will avoid the run on that day.
16:19:17 <trevor_intel1> fdegir: ping
16:19:25 <radez> trevor_intel1: yes I think so, I don't seem to be hitting that anymore
16:19:45 <jmorgan1> radez: issue before is the Apex installer had problem with identifying network interfaces in Intel POD 2 due to different platforms
16:19:59 <trevor_intel1> fdegir: We need some down time with Intel POD 4 to migrate to the new switch environment
16:20:11 <trevor_intel1> fdegir: When do you think that will be possible?
16:20:24 <trevor_intel1> Jack: How much downtime is needed for POD 4?
16:20:51 <radez> jmorgan1: I suppose we may be hitting that agian, I'm still working on it I'll let you know when I get something that seems concrete
16:21:15 <jmorgan1> radez: one platforms listed 1gbe interfaces, then 10gbe while another mixed them 1gbe,10gbe,1gbe,10gbe
16:21:32 <jmorgan1> radez: Intel POD 7 has the same platform
16:21:36 <radez> yea that would confuse things
16:21:57 <radez> I may have to talk to the RDO manager folks to figure out how to get around that
16:22:19 <trevor_intel1> radez: Ok I am closing 90 now since it relates to POD 2. If there is a new issue with POD 7 we can open a new issue
16:22:25 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: I need to uncable 20 servers, pull current switches out, install new ones, then recable and label - I think one day should be enouh
16:22:26 <radez> ack
16:23:57 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: I also need to change the IPMI IP on all those servers and update the documentation in the opnfv wiki
16:24:19 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: another 1/2 day for documentation
16:25:06 <trevor_intel1> Jack: ok
16:25:18 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: I found two Ubuntu virtual machines I think you were using as jump hosts, are you still using them?
16:25:41 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: if not, I will be removing them
16:25:46 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: i want to keep those as i uses them to reconfigure the jumphost occassionally
16:26:25 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: also, are you using any tagged vlans? or need more then 3 networks?
16:26:44 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: we do not need tagged vlan
16:26:49 <trevor_intel1> radez: Re. the issue that was on POD 2 ... as I understand it was because the hw was not homogeneous ... that shoudl be solved with POD 7 as every interface is identical
16:26:54 <narindergupta> as three networks are more than eough
16:27:00 <trevor_intel1> Jack: Did I get that correct?
16:27:10 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: do you need both vms as Intel POD 5/6 will be on the same network
16:27:16 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: good
16:27:28 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: same network means?
16:27:57 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: yes, see my note above
16:28:17 <trevor_intel1> radez: So I am wondering why you say ... 08:21:11 AM) radez: jmorgan1: I suppose we may be hitting that agian,
16:28:41 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: env117 hs 10.2.117.0/24 network - all Intel PODs are on that network not isolated networks like you currently have in env065/066
16:29:21 <narindergupta> jmorgan1:  it might reduce to one VM then but i need jumphost eth3 connected to that vm then
16:29:34 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: my thinking is you only need one vm to manage jumphost not two
16:29:35 <narindergupta> for both pod5 and pod6
16:29:43 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: correct
16:30:05 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: and we can work on connectivity once we mighrate to new network
16:30:35 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: also can we have /23 network on admin for both pod5 and pod6
16:30:36 <narindergupta> ?
16:30:49 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: i will migrate one of your vms to env117, do you have preference between POD5 of POD6 vm?
16:31:04 <narindergupta> anyone will do.
16:31:12 <narindergupta> no preference
16:31:45 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: i think pod5 is better
16:32:00 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: you can set whatever network you want on that interface (admin) since its untagged, please take a look at Intel POD 7 as an example of topology
16:33:05 <jmorgan1> if0 (igbe) is rmm/ipmi + dmz interface, if1 (1gbe) is admin (isolated), if2 (10gbe) private, if3 (10gbe) is public
16:33:29 <jmorgan1> narindergupta: i'll work with you more offline to sort out the details
16:33:41 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: sure sounds good to me thanks
16:33:59 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: i need intel pod 4 schedule for downtime, intel pod5/6 would like to do it soon
16:34:41 <trevor_intel1> Jack: I just sent a message to Fatih but he is away
16:34:53 <narindergupta> jmorgan1: yeah sooner is better as it leads to changes in joid as well
16:35:09 <trevor_intel1> As soon as he responds will ping you
16:35:16 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: understood, its just the blocker to completing this task
16:36:18 <trevor_intel1> Jack: Ok he is usually very responsive so expect he will get back soon
16:36:44 <jmorgan1> trevor_intel1: np
16:37:04 <trevor_intel1> Any other POD issues / questions today?
16:37:35 <trevor_intel1> #topic Docs
16:38:29 <trevor_intel1> #info I was finally able to get the docs to build, added license headers and fixed many of the fomatting issues ... http://artifacts.opnfv.org/pharos/docs/
16:39:06 <trevor_intel1> #info I have also (finally) been able to build the docs locally ... so now can work on improving them
16:39:37 <trevor_intel1> #info There is still work to do and hope to complete draft of all docs this week
16:41:00 <trevor_intel1> Any other topics today?
16:41:39 <trevor_intel1> Otherwise lets get back to work! ;-)
16:41:39 <jmorgan1> what about looking at JIRA tasks this month? those that have been created last year
16:44:29 <trevor_intel1> Jack: As mentioned its on my list behind Rls B docs ... goal is to clean up Jira by end of the month and then keep up to date. In this meeting will not be productive as many owners and stakeholders are not here.
16:45:54 <trevor_intel1> Anything else or I will close the meeting
16:46:28 <trevor_intel1> Thanks for attending
16:46:46 <trevor_intel1> #endmeeting