15:03:49 #startmeeting OPNFV Infra Working Group 15:03:49 Meeting started Wed May 18 15:03:49 2016 UTC. The chair is trevor_intel_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:49 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:03:49 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_infra_working_group' 15:04:18 meeting in here? 15:04:31 not #opnfv-meetings? 15:05:13 goto link? 15:05:19 one sec 15:05:31 not GTM 15:05:34 we are on skype 15:05:44 i can send the meeting link CHris 15:05:59 oh the original one still? cool think I have it 15:06:11 https://meet.intel.com/trevor.cooper/FJJ3N3RQ ?? 15:06:27 yes 15:06:28 https://meet.intel.com/trevor.cooper/FJJ3N3RQ 15:06:28 ack 15:06:30 yes 15:06:55 link to gtm? 15:06:58 +1(916)356-2663 (or your local bridge access #) Choose bridge 5. 15:07:06 or https://meet.intel.com/trevor.cooper/FJJ3N3RQ 15:07:06 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group current agenda 15:07:10 lync/skype 15:07:18 thanks dan 15:07:38 find local number: https://dial.intel.com/ 15:07:48 Up to date agenda is on trevor_intel1 's mail 15:08:09 some extra stuff like milestone regarding infra stuff etc 15:08:21 * ChrisPriceAB applauds warmly 15:08:41 not for the second point, for Jack... 15:09:39 conference id? 15:10:06 aricg the lync link above. https://meet.intel.com/trevor.cooper/FJJ3N3RQ 15:10:06 Conference ID: 532051 15:10:12 still not on goto 15:10:14 nah. dial in id is diff. 15:10:19 ah ok 15:10:51 I will have to drop in a minute or two, I can't stay on lync and there is no dial in from europe... 15:12:26 ChrisPriceAB: skype app works fine 15:15:10 #info intern projects https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/Intern-projects-page 15:15:49 #info Dan to add project proposal for intern on dashboards / booking tools 15:18:39 #topic - Pharos milestone and POD allocation 15:20:17 #info Projects need alternative configurations for development e.g. multisite 15:24:12 #info The issue that came up in the Release meeting yesterday was whether we have the functional capability and the capacity to support all test requirements for Colorado 15:25:06 #info This is related to MS5 "Test infrastructure updates completed" on the schedule. 15:25:21 #info we need a way to verify this milestone. 15:25:23 dmcbride: different issue 15:25:39 can we have these type of requests go to jira 15:25:51 and discussed towards to the wnd of the meeting in aobä 15:25:53 aob 15:25:54 fdegir: tthey are 15:26:13 fdegir: feature project needs to drive jira request to be completed 15:26:24 then again we can take the discussion towards the end 15:26:47 2nd issue is change to pharos spec process for feature projects 15:26:51 we have the overall milestone and the other stuff to discusswhich impact whole community 15:27:24 fdegir: ok 15:27:46 yes, having resources to meet milestones during releases dissusion is needed 15:28:18 fdegir: It does highlight a general problem which is expectations that projects have on infra. I think there is a mismatch 15:28:40 good point 15:28:43 I agree to that 15:29:01 but my point is, this type of discussions can go into its own heading in meeting 15:29:28 hi guys. I'm on the call, but just wondering how we can get another 32GB stick in the LF POD1 jumphost 15:30:06 like "Project Infra Requests" 15:30:52 and we try to allocate maybe 10 minutes minimum weekly 15:31:05 given that all the discussions took on jira or other mediums 15:34:18 fdegir: yes, its a good point - we should be doing jira scrubbing in this meeting weekly. 15:35:00 yes.. move on 15:36:17 #info Still need a Pharos change process 15:38:02 trozet: i suggest submitting a jira request for lf pod1 to add more memory 15:38:23 jmorgan1: aricg said it has to be approved by the board :) 15:39:29 jmorgan1: when money needs to be spent, it goes to the board 15:39:48 jmorgan1: for opnfv project hw 15:44:22 jmorgan1: https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/PHAROS-186 15:45:17 fdegir: cant we just get some allotment of $ per quarter for minor hardware equipement 15:45:28 fdegir: seems kind of ridiculous to go to the board for a stick of ram... 15:45:36 trozet: agree with you 15:45:55 ChrisPriceAB:^^ 15:45:59 trozet: this could be a proposal for budget handling with an upper limit like you say 15:46:06 hey tim.. for me, i think you should get your Ram right away.. i dont think you shoudl wait or the infra group 15:46:20 DanSmithEricsson: it is not about if he should get or not 15:46:29 i think that the "update" to the requiremenst of the jumnpstat is a documentation update for C_releaes for us 15:46:55 https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Test+Lab+Reservation+Calendars 15:46:55 and yes.. agree 100% that the aquisition of the RAM (buying it) shouldnt require exec approcal 15:47:01 DanSmithEricsson: cool 15:47:10 we just got 132GiB on intel pod 7 15:47:16 so im just using that for now for virtual deployments 15:47:18 approval - and we need to have a 'growtg forecast' allotement provided on a per year basis perhaps? 15:47:27 i got to run guys, i filed the JIRA, thanks for discussing 15:47:36 my new pod (dec) all has 128 or 256 15:47:41 thanks Tim - 15:47:47 DanSmithEricsson: when opnfv money needs to be spent, it requires board approval 15:48:00 having lag in my irc 15:48:00 client 15:48:07 #link http://52.11.159.93/opnfv-ci-dashboard/index.php 15:54:53 I have lost audio 15:59:24 CI POD booking has lower priority for the timebeing 15:59:43 essentially they should not be bookable even by PTLs 16:02:01 fdegir: ok, let's start with booking dev pods only 16:02:18 yep 16:03:08 #topic Infra Priorities 16:03:30 1. Lab resource booking and usage dashboard (resource management) 16:03:30 16:03:30 2. Pharos compliance verification/validation 16:03:30 • Intern project starting 16:03:30 • Future phase … extend to verifying/validating POD setup for automatic configuration of our PODs. 16:03:30 16:03:31 3. Alignment of labs/pods/installer configurations for automatic POD configuration. One way of specifying POD, network and installer configurations so we can utilize these configurations to do automatic configuration. 16:03:32 16:03:32 4. LaaS (or virtual environments) 16:03:32 • Our CI can't support the community anymore if we keep on running stuff on our limited no of bare metal CI PODs. 16:03:32 • Apart from this, the development work can be a lot easier if we have the development environments made homogenous. 16:03:33 16:03:33 5. Jenkins issues with permissions, scheduling, sandbox type of activities and so on. 16:03:34 16:03:49 agend ahere: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group 16:07:45 #info Dan will setup a meeting with David McBride re. resource planning/allocation 16:12:59 #info Jack to start an Etherpad to capture ideas for dynamic allocation of PODs 16:15:51 #info Dan to update Wiki page on vision and objectives 16:16:56 DanSmithEricsson: jmorgan1: we have this section on infra space 16:17:25 DanSmithEricsson: jmorgan1: under that we have subpages focusing on different infra parts 16:17:31 DanSmithEricsson: jmorgan1: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Improvement+Activities 16:17:54 DanSmithEricsson: jmorgan1: which gives details regarding what improvements are planned/ongoing, referring back to jira 16:18:03 #endmeeting