13:00:45 <hwoarang> #startmeeting Cross Community CI 13:00:45 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Oct 11 13:00:45 2017 UTC. The chair is hwoarang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:45 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:00:45 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci' 13:00:55 <hwoarang> please type in your name if you are joining the XCI meeting 13:01:06 <David_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau 13:01:08 <David_Orange> Hi 13:01:16 <hw_wutianwei> #info tianwei 13:01:17 <hwoarang> #topic Roll call 13:01:30 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras 13:01:41 <hwoarang> the agenda is in its usual place: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/xci-meetings 13:02:00 <hwoarang> lets wait a couple of minutes for people to add/remove items 13:02:46 <liangqi> #info qiliang 13:03:17 <epalper> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy 13:04:03 <hwoarang> ok lets move on 13:04:24 <s3wong> #info Stephen Wong 13:04:42 <hwoarang> #topic Multi-distro Support 13:05:01 <hwoarang> #info Ubuntu/openSUSE are voting and work fine 13:05:44 <hwoarang> #info CentOS is still WIP 13:05:47 <hwoarang> #link https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-October/018459.html 13:05:50 <hwoarang> ^ report from Tapio 13:06:20 <hwoarang> anything else you would like to add? 13:07:22 <hwoarang> ok moving on :) 13:07:22 <hwoarang> #topic Testing 13:07:55 <hwoarang> #info a few patches got in to enable scenario testing but more patches need reviewing 13:08:11 <hwoarang> we will discuss scenario testing again later on 13:08:16 <hwoarang> #topic Documentation 13:09:09 <hwoarang> #info Fatih sent quite a few documentation patches which have been merged. I presume that more patches are in the pipeline but I don't know much myself 13:09:45 <hwoarang> i guess nobody else is working on documenation so moving on 13:10:01 <hwoarang> #topic Release Readiness 13:11:04 <hwoarang> so from my point of view, the thing we miss is CentOS. I am not sure we will have it in time for the release and Tapio is not around to comment on that 13:11:14 <hwoarang> I guess documentation will be fine for the release 13:12:00 <hwoarang> ok lets talk about scenarios now :) 13:12:07 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-nosdn-nofeature 13:12:24 <hwoarang> #info default scenario works fine in CI 13:12:32 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-nofeature 13:12:36 <hwoarang> epalper: that's you now :) 13:13:05 <epalper> #info all the upstream reviews are merged now. releng-xci review is pending 13:13:21 <epalper> #info https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/39239/ 13:13:30 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/39239/ 13:13:35 <hwoarang> cool 13:14:27 <hwoarang> epalper: I want to talk to you and mbuil about they way to hook into the xci-deploy.sh but lets do it at the end of the scenario discussion 13:14:55 <epalper> okay :) 13:15:25 <hwoarang> epalper: can we also talk about os-nosdn-ovs ? 13:15:48 <epalper> #info again releng-xci review is pending for merge 13:15:57 <hwoarang> #topic os-nosdn-ovs 13:16:02 <epalper> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43447/ 13:16:17 <epalper> #info it is tested and working fine 13:16:17 <hwoarang> epalper: upstream OSA asked me about https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360 13:16:29 <hwoarang> is this something that affects us and we need to look at? 13:16:42 <hwoarang> they have no resources to dedicate on ovs right now. 13:16:52 <epalper> hwoarang: I didn't see it is reproducible now 13:17:03 <hwoarang> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360 13:17:11 <hwoarang> #info upstream bug not reproducible 13:17:15 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil 13:17:37 <epalper> #info OVS got installed in both neutron agent container and computes 13:17:46 <hwoarang> epalper: so you say that a pure OVS environment works with OSA right now? 13:18:04 <epalper> hwoarang: yes 13:18:17 <hwoarang> because at least the lxc_hosts role still has brctl references now 13:19:04 <epalper> we use neutron_plugin_type: ml2.ovs 13:19:23 <epalper> for os-nosdn-ovs scenario 13:19:42 <hwoarang> so is the upstream bug not reproducible for us because we do things differently? 13:19:54 <epalper> i hope so 13:20:10 <hwoarang> ok then 13:21:18 <hwoarang> something doesn't sound right because the containers will still create bridges in them. but anyway lets revisit in the future 13:21:20 <hwoarang> lets move on 13:21:30 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: don't forget to use link for meeting minutes 13:21:46 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: did i miss any links ? 13:21:52 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: or info i meant 13:22:16 <hwoarang> yeah will log what's left now 13:22:51 <hwoarang> #info os-nosdn-ovs scenario uses neutron_plugin_type: ml2.ovs 13:23:05 <hwoarang> #info lxc_hosts role still creates bridges in containers but that doesn't cause issues for us 13:23:14 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc 13:23:20 <hwoarang> mbuil: it's you now 13:23:51 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc 13:23:52 <mbuil> hwoarang: ok 13:24:26 <mbuil> hwoarang: We have now prepare-tests merged, so we can run functest tests correctly ==> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43635/ 13:24:53 <hwoarang> #info prepare-tests role playbook has been merged so functests tests work properly 13:24:57 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43635/ 13:25:13 <mbuil> hwoarang: The patch that connects the scenarios to xci is giving problems: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43469/ (even with the include_role module) 13:25:58 <mbuil> hwoarang: even if there is a condition for the execution of the role which does not apply, the role must be found by ansible 13:26:02 <hwoarang> #info plugging in the os-odl-sfc causes problems 13:26:07 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43469/ 13:26:37 <mbuil> hwoarang: That patch will complete the xci + os-odl-sfc scenario in stable/ocata 13:27:20 <mbuil> hwoarang: then I started migrating towards master. I need these two patches in OSA: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497458/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510909/ 13:27:38 <hwoarang> #info this is the final bit to get XCI + os-odl-sfc working (OSA version: stable/ocata) 13:27:49 <hwoarang> #info Moving to 'master' still needs work 13:27:54 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497458/ 13:28:00 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510909/ 13:28:08 <mbuil> hwoarang: however, I am facing a deadlock which makes the gating fail. I already reported it to the OSA guys and they ackowledged it. I am waiting for them to fix it 13:28:36 <hwoarang> #info upstream OSA problem is blocking progress 13:28:45 <hwoarang> #info upstream OSA is aware and looking into fixing it 13:29:00 <hwoarang> mbuil: what kind of deadlock? 13:31:08 <hwoarang> mbuil: ? 13:31:16 <mbuil> hwoarang: the gating of one patch is not working because git is not install. Then I create a patch to install git and the gating fails because when it upgrades from ocata to master, it can't find iptables when deploying ocata. Then I create a patch that installs iptables in ocata but the gating fails because git is not installed. The OSA guys told me to wait until they fix the upgrade gate because it should not upgrade from ocata but from pike 13:31:36 <hwoarang> aha ok 13:31:51 <hwoarang> #info the upstream OSA issue is related to the ocata->master upgrade functional testing 13:31:59 <hwoarang> ok anything else? 13:32:00 <mbuil> hwoarang: that's it 13:32:05 <hwoarang> ok good 13:32:18 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: k8s-nosdn-nofeature 13:32:24 <hwoarang> s3wong: that's you now :) 13:32:45 <s3wong> Just came back from PTO last week, so not a lot of forward progress from last week 13:33:06 <hwoarang> #info s3wong was on PTO last week so no progress since last week 13:33:09 <hwoarang> welcome back :) 13:33:19 <hwoarang> so moving on then? 13:33:35 <David_Orange> s3wong: just a thing 13:33:41 <s3wong> Will try to get a WIP patch out this week or early next week 13:33:52 <s3wong> David_Orange: yes? 13:33:56 <hwoarang> #info s3wong will try to get a WIP patch out this week or early next week 13:34:23 <David_Orange> s3wong: in orange side, Sylvain is working on a ranger deployment of k8s 13:35:07 <David_Orange> s3wong: we did not check your work yet, but he already had something 13:35:58 <David_Orange> s3wong: so it could just be another way. Please be sure that we will look at what you are working on :) 13:36:19 <s3wong> David_Orange: OK. Sounds good :-) 13:36:28 <David_Orange> s3wong: of course it is rancher, not "ranger" :) 13:36:49 <s3wong> David_Orange: yeah, I was wondering what "ranger" is :-) ... now it makes sense 13:37:08 <hwoarang> thank you David_Orange. ok to move on? 13:37:26 <David_Orange> s3wong: in our view it is something less clean but maybe quicker for testing phases 13:37:33 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes 13:37:36 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Congress 13:37:41 <hwoarang> Taseer: that's you now ^ 13:37:48 <Taseer> hwoarang: ok 13:38:09 <Taseer> I have requested folks from OSA to review the Congress role 13:38:19 <Taseer> They will post comments shortly 13:38:24 <hwoarang> #info upstream congress role ready for review 13:38:38 <Taseer> not completely ready, 13:38:48 <Taseer> first initial review, 13:38:49 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/503971/ 13:39:05 <hwoarang> #info role is still in WIP progress so it's looking for initial feedback 13:39:11 <hwoarang> great thank you Taseer 13:39:19 <Taseer> hwoarang: my pleasure 13:39:31 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Ceph 13:39:51 <hwoarang> hmm wutianwei is not around 13:40:00 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: hi 13:40:04 <hwoarang> ah you are :) 13:40:09 <hwoarang> hw_wutianwei: that's you then ^ :) 13:40:14 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: ok 13:40:29 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: it is almost ok, but some details need to improve 13:40:42 <hwoarang> #info Ceph passes CI and it's ready for review. Some details need improvement 13:40:44 <hw_wutianwei> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/42503/ 13:41:03 <hw_wutianwei> ^ improve 13:41:17 <hwoarang> thank you hw_wutianwei 13:41:22 <hw_wutianwei> and need more people review 13:41:57 <hwoarang> as always :) 13:42:01 <hwoarang> anything else? 13:42:04 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: that's all 13:42:07 <hwoarang> thank you 13:42:19 <hwoarang> epalper: mbuil lets talk about your patches after the meeting 13:42:39 <hwoarang> because you both have some similarities 13:42:43 <hwoarang> lets move on 13:42:44 <hwoarang> #topic Baremetal Status 13:43:05 <hwoarang> David_Orange: that's you now ^ :) 13:43:11 <David_Orange> rewritting of playbooks to roles done, Orange CI deploy OK 13:43:25 <David_Orange> the code is now deployed inside orange lab using a gitlab-ci to avoid code regression and prepare to opnfv-ci 13:43:29 <hwoarang> #info David_Orange rewrote the playbooks and roles 13:43:36 <hwoarang> #info Orange CI deployment looks OK 13:43:50 <hwoarang> #info the code is now deployed inside orange lab using a gitlab-ci to avoid code regression and prepare to opnfv-ci 13:44:05 <David_Orange> the patch is correcting ext-net creation error is in testing phase 13:44:20 <David_Orange> the new version of code including roles will be pushed on opnfv git when this patch will be checked 13:44:26 <hwoarang> #info the patch correcting ext-net creation error is in testing phase 13:44:42 <hwoarang> by opnfv git you mean gerrit? 13:44:57 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes 13:44:59 <hwoarang> #info updated patchset will be posted after further verification 13:45:01 <hwoarang> ok cool 13:45:09 <David_Orange> the reviews on gerrit shall wait for this update 13:45:25 <David_Orange> i am working on an sdf-like reference for a multi scenario xci-baremetal prototype (os/k8s, ha/noha, onap feature) 13:45:45 <hwoarang> #info David_Orange is working on an sdf-like reference for a multi scenario xci-baremetal prototype (os/k8s, ha/noha, onap feature) 13:46:15 <hwoarang> thank you David_Orange 13:46:17 <hwoarang> anything else? 13:46:19 <David_Orange> hwoarang: that's all for this week :) 13:46:22 <hwoarang> awesome 13:46:40 <hwoarang> #topic AoB 13:47:13 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: any news about the new POD or firewall issue? 13:47:26 <durschatz> David_Orange: Any update on ONAP on vPOD? 13:47:48 <durschatz> #info Dave Urschatz 13:48:14 <David_Orange> durschatz: my new colleage sylvain_orange is working on deploying k8s with rancher, and then use oom 13:48:40 <David_Orange> durschatz: i hope we will provide a onap feature for the plugfest 13:49:11 <David_Orange> durschatz: so WIP about that 13:49:29 <durschatz> thanks! 13:49:40 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: i will provide vpn access to intel POD 16 today 13:49:53 <hwoarang> #info jmorgan1 to provide vpn access to new Intel POD 16 today 13:49:58 <hwoarang> thank you jmorgan1 13:50:11 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: not new 13:51:20 <hwoarang> #undo 13:51:20 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x3764390> 13:51:37 <hwoarang> #info jmorgan1 to provide vpn access to Intel POD 16 today 13:51:43 <hwoarang> anything elsE? 13:51:51 <jmorgan1> nO 13:51:55 <hwoarang> ;p 13:52:01 <jmorgan1> ;P 13:52:08 <hwoarang> does anyone else want to add anytihng? 13:52:22 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: yes 13:52:42 <jmorgan1> intel POD 20 will go away by end of month 13:52:49 <hwoarang> ohhhh 13:53:05 <jmorgan1> you will need to migrate to Intel POD16 and POD17 13:53:08 <hwoarang> #info Intel POD 20 is going away by end of month 13:53:24 <hwoarang> #info developers need to migrate their stuff to Intel POD 16 and 17 13:53:37 <hwoarang> ok jmorgan1 13:53:43 <jmorgan1> thanks 13:54:24 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: good job leading todays meeting 13:54:28 <hwoarang> so unless anyone has anything more to add, I will end the meeting 13:54:30 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: thank you! 13:54:33 <hwoarang> 3... 13:54:34 <hwoarang> 2... 13:54:39 <hwoarang> 1,5... 13:54:47 <hwoarang> #endmeeting