13:00:45 <hwoarang> #startmeeting Cross Community CI
13:00:45 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Oct 11 13:00:45 2017 UTC.  The chair is hwoarang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:45 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:00:45 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci'
13:00:55 <hwoarang> please type in your name if you are joining the XCI meeting
13:01:06 <David_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau
13:01:08 <David_Orange> Hi
13:01:16 <hw_wutianwei> #info tianwei
13:01:17 <hwoarang> #topic Roll call
13:01:30 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras
13:01:41 <hwoarang> the agenda is in its usual place: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/xci-meetings
13:02:00 <hwoarang> lets wait a couple of minutes for people to add/remove items
13:02:46 <liangqi> #info qiliang
13:03:17 <epalper> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy
13:04:03 <hwoarang> ok lets move on
13:04:24 <s3wong> #info Stephen Wong
13:04:42 <hwoarang> #topic Multi-distro Support
13:05:01 <hwoarang> #info Ubuntu/openSUSE are voting and work fine
13:05:44 <hwoarang> #info CentOS is still WIP
13:05:47 <hwoarang> #link https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-October/018459.html
13:05:50 <hwoarang> ^ report from Tapio
13:06:20 <hwoarang> anything else you would like to add?
13:07:22 <hwoarang> ok moving on :)
13:07:22 <hwoarang> #topic Testing
13:07:55 <hwoarang> #info a few patches got in to enable scenario testing but more patches need reviewing
13:08:11 <hwoarang> we will discuss scenario testing again later on
13:08:16 <hwoarang> #topic Documentation
13:09:09 <hwoarang> #info Fatih sent quite a few documentation patches which have been merged. I presume that more patches are in the pipeline but I don't know much myself
13:09:45 <hwoarang> i guess nobody else is working on documenation so moving on
13:10:01 <hwoarang> #topic Release Readiness
13:11:04 <hwoarang> so from my point of view, the thing we miss is CentOS. I am not sure we will have it in time for the release and Tapio is not around to comment on that
13:11:14 <hwoarang> I guess documentation will be fine for the release
13:12:00 <hwoarang> ok lets talk about scenarios now :)
13:12:07 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-nosdn-nofeature
13:12:24 <hwoarang> #info default scenario works fine in CI
13:12:32 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-nofeature
13:12:36 <hwoarang> epalper: that's you now :)
13:13:05 <epalper> #info all the upstream reviews are merged now. releng-xci review is pending
13:13:21 <epalper> #info https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/39239/
13:13:30 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/39239/
13:13:35 <hwoarang> cool
13:14:27 <hwoarang> epalper: I want to talk to you and mbuil about they way to hook into the xci-deploy.sh but lets do it at the end of the scenario discussion
13:14:55 <epalper> okay :)
13:15:25 <hwoarang> epalper: can we also talk about os-nosdn-ovs  ?
13:15:48 <epalper> #info again releng-xci review is pending for merge
13:15:57 <hwoarang> #topic os-nosdn-ovs
13:16:02 <epalper> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43447/
13:16:17 <epalper> #info it is tested and working fine
13:16:17 <hwoarang> epalper: upstream OSA asked me about https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360
13:16:29 <hwoarang> is this something that affects us and we need to look at?
13:16:42 <hwoarang> they have no resources to dedicate on ovs right now.
13:16:52 <epalper> hwoarang: I didn't see it is reproducible now
13:17:03 <hwoarang> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1708360
13:17:11 <hwoarang> #info upstream bug not reproducible
13:17:15 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil
13:17:37 <epalper> #info OVS got installed in both neutron agent container and computes
13:17:46 <hwoarang> epalper: so you say that a pure OVS environment works with OSA right now?
13:18:04 <epalper> hwoarang: yes
13:18:17 <hwoarang> because at least the lxc_hosts role still has brctl references now
13:19:04 <epalper> we use neutron_plugin_type: ml2.ovs
13:19:23 <epalper> for os-nosdn-ovs scenario
13:19:42 <hwoarang> so is the upstream bug not reproducible for us because we do things differently?
13:19:54 <epalper> i hope so
13:20:10 <hwoarang> ok then
13:21:18 <hwoarang> something doesn't sound right because the containers will still create bridges in them. but anyway lets revisit in the future
13:21:20 <hwoarang> lets move on
13:21:30 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: don't forget to use link for meeting minutes
13:21:46 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: did i miss any links ?
13:21:52 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: or info i meant
13:22:16 <hwoarang> yeah will log what's left now
13:22:51 <hwoarang> #info os-nosdn-ovs scenario uses neutron_plugin_type: ml2.ovs
13:23:05 <hwoarang> #info lxc_hosts role still creates bridges in containers but that doesn't cause issues for us
13:23:14 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc
13:23:20 <hwoarang> mbuil: it's you now
13:23:51 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: os-odl-sfc
13:23:52 <mbuil> hwoarang: ok
13:24:26 <mbuil> hwoarang: We have now prepare-tests merged, so we can run functest tests correctly ==> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43635/
13:24:53 <hwoarang> #info prepare-tests role playbook has been merged so functests tests work properly
13:24:57 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43635/
13:25:13 <mbuil> hwoarang: The patch that connects the scenarios to xci is giving problems: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43469/ (even with the include_role module)
13:25:58 <mbuil> hwoarang: even if there is a condition for the execution of the role which does not apply, the role must be found by ansible
13:26:02 <hwoarang> #info plugging in the os-odl-sfc causes problems
13:26:07 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/43469/
13:26:37 <mbuil> hwoarang: That patch will complete the xci + os-odl-sfc scenario in stable/ocata
13:27:20 <mbuil> hwoarang: then I started migrating towards master. I need these two patches in OSA: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497458/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510909/
13:27:38 <hwoarang> #info this is the final bit to get XCI + os-odl-sfc working (OSA version: stable/ocata)
13:27:49 <hwoarang> #info Moving to 'master' still needs work
13:27:54 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/497458/
13:28:00 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510909/
13:28:08 <mbuil> hwoarang: however, I am facing a deadlock which makes the gating fail. I already reported it to the OSA guys and they ackowledged it. I am waiting for them to fix it
13:28:36 <hwoarang> #info upstream OSA problem is blocking progress
13:28:45 <hwoarang> #info upstream OSA is aware and looking into fixing it
13:29:00 <hwoarang> mbuil: what kind of deadlock?
13:31:08 <hwoarang> mbuil: ?
13:31:16 <mbuil> hwoarang: the gating of one patch is not working because git is not install. Then I create a patch to install git and the gating fails because when it upgrades from ocata to master, it can't find iptables when deploying ocata. Then I create a patch that installs iptables in ocata but the gating fails because git is not installed. The OSA guys told me to wait until they fix the upgrade gate because it should not upgrade from ocata but from pike
13:31:36 <hwoarang> aha ok
13:31:51 <hwoarang> #info the upstream OSA issue is related to the ocata->master upgrade functional testing
13:31:59 <hwoarang> ok anything else?
13:32:00 <mbuil> hwoarang: that's it
13:32:05 <hwoarang> ok good
13:32:18 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: k8s-nosdn-nofeature
13:32:24 <hwoarang> s3wong: that's you now :)
13:32:45 <s3wong> Just came back from PTO last week, so not a lot of forward progress from last week
13:33:06 <hwoarang> #info s3wong was on PTO last week so no progress since last week
13:33:09 <hwoarang> welcome back :)
13:33:19 <hwoarang> so moving on then?
13:33:35 <David_Orange> s3wong: just a thing
13:33:41 <s3wong> Will try to get a WIP patch out this week or early next week
13:33:52 <s3wong> David_Orange: yes?
13:33:56 <hwoarang> #info s3wong will try to get a WIP patch out this week or early next week
13:34:23 <David_Orange> s3wong: in orange side, Sylvain is working on a ranger deployment of k8s
13:35:07 <David_Orange> s3wong: we did not check your work yet, but he already had something
13:35:58 <David_Orange> s3wong: so it could just be another way. Please be sure that we will look at what you are working on :)
13:36:19 <s3wong> David_Orange: OK. Sounds good :-)
13:36:28 <David_Orange> s3wong: of course it is rancher, not "ranger" :)
13:36:49 <s3wong> David_Orange: yeah, I was wondering what "ranger" is :-) ... now it makes sense
13:37:08 <hwoarang> thank you David_Orange. ok to move on?
13:37:26 <David_Orange> s3wong: in our view it is something less clean but maybe quicker for testing phases
13:37:33 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes
13:37:36 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Congress
13:37:41 <hwoarang> Taseer: that's you now ^
13:37:48 <Taseer> hwoarang: ok
13:38:09 <Taseer> I have requested folks from OSA to review the Congress role
13:38:19 <Taseer> They will post comments shortly
13:38:24 <hwoarang> #info upstream congress role ready for review
13:38:38 <Taseer> not completely ready,
13:38:48 <Taseer> first initial review,
13:38:49 <hwoarang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/503971/
13:39:05 <hwoarang> #info role is still in WIP progress so it's looking for initial feedback
13:39:11 <hwoarang> great thank you Taseer
13:39:19 <Taseer> hwoarang: my pleasure
13:39:31 <hwoarang> #topic Scenario/Feature Status: Ceph
13:39:51 <hwoarang> hmm wutianwei is not around
13:40:00 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: hi
13:40:04 <hwoarang> ah you are :)
13:40:09 <hwoarang> hw_wutianwei: that's you then ^ :)
13:40:14 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: ok
13:40:29 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: it is almost ok, but some details need to improve
13:40:42 <hwoarang> #info Ceph passes CI and it's ready for review. Some details need improvement
13:40:44 <hw_wutianwei> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/42503/
13:41:03 <hw_wutianwei> ^ improve
13:41:17 <hwoarang> thank you hw_wutianwei
13:41:22 <hw_wutianwei> and need more people review
13:41:57 <hwoarang> as always :)
13:42:01 <hwoarang> anything else?
13:42:04 <hw_wutianwei> hwoarang: that's all
13:42:07 <hwoarang> thank you
13:42:19 <hwoarang> epalper: mbuil lets talk about your patches after the meeting
13:42:39 <hwoarang> because you both have some similarities
13:42:43 <hwoarang> lets move on
13:42:44 <hwoarang> #topic Baremetal Status
13:43:05 <hwoarang> David_Orange: that's you now ^ :)
13:43:11 <David_Orange> rewritting of playbooks to roles done, Orange CI deploy OK
13:43:25 <David_Orange> the code is now deployed inside orange lab using a gitlab-ci to avoid code regression and prepare to opnfv-ci
13:43:29 <hwoarang> #info David_Orange rewrote the playbooks and roles
13:43:36 <hwoarang> #info Orange CI deployment looks OK
13:43:50 <hwoarang> #info the code is now deployed inside orange lab using a gitlab-ci to avoid code regression and prepare to opnfv-ci
13:44:05 <David_Orange> the patch is correcting ext-net creation error is in testing phase
13:44:20 <David_Orange> the new version of code including roles will be pushed on opnfv git when this patch will be checked
13:44:26 <hwoarang> #info the patch correcting ext-net creation error is in testing phase
13:44:42 <hwoarang> by opnfv git you mean gerrit?
13:44:57 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes
13:44:59 <hwoarang> #info updated patchset will be posted after further verification
13:45:01 <hwoarang> ok cool
13:45:09 <David_Orange> the reviews on gerrit shall wait for this update
13:45:25 <David_Orange> i am working on an sdf-like reference for a multi scenario xci-baremetal prototype (os/k8s, ha/noha, onap feature)
13:45:45 <hwoarang> #info David_Orange is working on an sdf-like reference for a multi scenario xci-baremetal prototype (os/k8s, ha/noha, onap feature)
13:46:15 <hwoarang> thank you David_Orange
13:46:17 <hwoarang> anything else?
13:46:19 <David_Orange> hwoarang: that's all for this week :)
13:46:22 <hwoarang> awesome
13:46:40 <hwoarang> #topic AoB
13:47:13 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: any news about the new POD or firewall issue?
13:47:26 <durschatz> David_Orange: Any update on ONAP on vPOD?
13:47:48 <durschatz> #info Dave Urschatz
13:48:14 <David_Orange> durschatz: my new colleage sylvain_orange is working on deploying k8s with rancher, and then use oom
13:48:40 <David_Orange> durschatz: i hope we will provide a onap feature for the plugfest
13:49:11 <David_Orange> durschatz: so WIP about that
13:49:29 <durschatz> thanks!
13:49:40 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: i will provide vpn access to intel POD 16 today
13:49:53 <hwoarang> #info jmorgan1 to provide vpn access to new Intel POD 16 today
13:49:58 <hwoarang> thank you jmorgan1
13:50:11 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: not new
13:51:20 <hwoarang> #undo
13:51:20 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x3764390>
13:51:37 <hwoarang> #info  jmorgan1 to provide vpn access to Intel POD 16 today
13:51:43 <hwoarang> anything elsE?
13:51:51 <jmorgan1> nO
13:51:55 <hwoarang> ;p
13:52:01 <jmorgan1> ;P
13:52:08 <hwoarang> does anyone else want to add anytihng?
13:52:22 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: yes
13:52:42 <jmorgan1> intel POD 20 will go away by end of month
13:52:49 <hwoarang> ohhhh
13:53:05 <jmorgan1> you will need to migrate to Intel POD16 and POD17
13:53:08 <hwoarang> #info Intel POD 20 is going away by end of month
13:53:24 <hwoarang> #info developers need to migrate their stuff to Intel POD 16 and 17
13:53:37 <hwoarang> ok jmorgan1
13:53:43 <jmorgan1> thanks
13:54:24 <jmorgan1> hwoarang: good job leading todays meeting
13:54:28 <hwoarang> so unless anyone has anything more to add, I will end the meeting
13:54:30 <hwoarang> jmorgan1: thank you!
13:54:33 <hwoarang> 3...
13:54:34 <hwoarang> 2...
13:54:39 <hwoarang> 1,5...
13:54:47 <hwoarang> #endmeeting