14:00:50 <hwoarang> #startmeeting Cross Community CI 14:00:50 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Mar 21 14:00:50 2018 UTC. The chair is hwoarang. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:50 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:50 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'cross_community_ci' 14:00:56 <hwoarang> #topic Rollcall 14:00:59 <hwoarang> identify yourselves 14:01:05 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan 14:01:06 <mardim> #info Dimitrios Markou 14:01:09 <hw_wutianwei_> #info Tianwei Wu 14:01:16 <hwoarang> fdegir is away so i will chair the meeting this week. Hopefully it will be short 14:01:21 <hwoarang> #info Markos Chandras 14:01:30 <electrocucaracha> #info Victor Morales 14:01:40 <hwoarang> agenda is on the usual place 14:01:42 <hwoarang> #link https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/xci-meetings 14:01:57 <hwoarang> please add anything that you think it's missing 14:02:05 <hwoarang> i will wait 1 min before we begin 14:03:19 <David_Orange> #info David Blaisonneau 14:03:42 <hwoarang> ok moving on 14:04:13 <hwoarang> #topic High Priority Items 14:04:36 <hwoarang> #info CI verification jobs for both internal and external scenario have been enabled 14:04:50 <hwoarang> which basically means that CI will test the right thing based on what your patchset modifies 14:05:15 <hwoarang> #info centos is not voting and needs love 14:05:47 <hwoarang> #info merge jobs has also been enabled for internal and external scenarios 14:06:08 <hwoarang> so the taking point here is that CI is doing well, but if you care about centos it's time to step up :) 14:06:38 <hwoarang> #info functest - openstack healthcheck is used in verify and merge jobs 14:06:49 <hwoarang> #info functest - smoke test integration is WIP 14:07:04 <hwoarang> #info functest - k8s healthcheck integration is WIP 14:07:42 <hwoarang> #info baremetal - patches at https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/status:open+project:releng-xci+branch:master+topic:stabilization 14:07:46 <hwoarang> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/status:open+project:releng-xci+branch:master+topic:stabilization 14:07:56 <hwoarang> so anything that you would like to add, discuss etc? 14:08:37 <hwoarang> I encourage you to actually try the BM patches and review them. 14:08:39 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil 14:09:10 <David_Orange> and feel free to contact me for any support on PDF/IDF creation for your infra 14:09:14 <mbuil> hwoarang: those jobs are not voting right? 14:09:20 <epalper> #info Periyasamy Palanisamy 14:09:22 <mbuil> merge jobs I mean 14:10:46 <hwoarang> mbuil: probably not 14:10:51 <hwoarang> but i am not too sure 14:11:24 <hwoarang> ok moving on 14:11:27 <hwoarang> #topic Quick Status Check for the Scenarios 14:11:37 <hwoarang> scenario people anything that you would like to say? 14:12:44 <mbuil> no update from sfc. Still working on patches 14:12:53 <hw_wutianwei_> hwoarang: I am try to create the k8-canal-nofeature scenario 14:13:05 <mardim> #info do not use ansible <2.4.3 14:13:17 <mardim> #info will fail with SSL error 14:13:18 <mbuil> mardim: what is the problem? 14:13:52 <hwoarang> #info hw_wutianwei is working on the k8-canal-nofeature scenario 14:13:53 <mardim> mbuil, if we use ansible lower that 2.4.3 it will give SSL error 14:14:05 <mardim> is a bug in Ansible if I am not mistaken 14:14:11 <hwoarang> mardim: something else is missing it's very unlikely for ansible to have broken ssl for all these years ;p 14:14:40 <mardim> hwoarang, when I changed the ansible version 14:14:40 <hwoarang> maybe 2.4.3 pulled just a pip dependency that you were missing before 14:14:50 <hwoarang> and fixed it by 'accident' 14:14:50 <mardim> SFC pike deployed succesfully 14:15:04 <hwoarang> like python-cryptography 14:15:35 <mardim> hwoarang, Yes Maybe that too 14:15:41 <mardim> hwoarang, To be honest 14:15:59 <mardim> hwoarang, I din't search it furhter after it deployed succesfully 14:16:06 <mardim> :) 14:16:10 <hwoarang> so lets figure it out the next time it happens 14:16:16 <hwoarang> ok scenarios are good then moving on 14:16:18 <mardim> hwoarang, cool 14:16:23 <epalper> The upstream reviews for bgpvpn scenario are merged in osa and ansible-opendaylight. will work with fdegir in updating xci sha's 14:16:53 <hwoarang> #info bgpvpn scenarion merged in osa/queens ansible-opendaylight. Need to bump shas soon 14:17:03 <hwoarang> #undo 14:17:03 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x2514f90> 14:17:06 <hwoarang> can't type 14:17:13 <hwoarang> #info bgpvpn scenario merged in osa/queens and ansible-opendaylight. Need to bump shas soon 14:17:17 <hwoarang> ok thanks epalper 14:17:35 <mardim> hwoarang, mbuil more info here https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/25402 14:17:57 <hwoarang> i think we will do one more queens bump before moving to rocky to be honest 14:18:50 <hwoarang> #info ansible -2.3 is having issues with ssl - https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/25402 14:19:06 <hwoarang> #info possibly affecting OSA pins < Queens 14:19:23 <hwoarang> thanks mardim 14:19:34 <hwoarang> ok nothing else from scenarios i suppose 14:19:38 <hwoarang> #topic - AoB 14:19:59 <hwoarang> anything for ONS next week worth mentioning here? 14:20:39 <mbuil> mardim and I are showing a demo in the LFN booth on Wednesday and Thursday :) 14:20:55 <mbuil> demo about XCI. Pass by and talk to us! We like people ;) 14:21:11 <hwoarang> #info ONS - mardim and mbuil are showing an XCI demo in the LFN booth on Wednesday and Thursday 14:21:16 <epalper> I will be giving demo on BGPVPN 14:21:27 <mardim> I will give candies for free :) 14:21:34 <mbuil> I forgot epalper is also in the demo :) 14:21:41 <hwoarang> epalper: based on XCI righ? :D 14:21:58 <epalper> yes hwoarang, from XCI :) 14:22:02 <hwoarang> #info ONS - epalper will have a demo about XCI BGPVPN 14:22:04 <hwoarang> cool! 14:22:19 <hwoarang> better not break anything by then :p 14:22:27 <hwoarang> *until then! 14:22:47 <epalper> I just had trial run with latest xci, it works :) 14:23:01 <hwoarang> great 14:23:08 <hwoarang> good luck with your demos then! 14:24:15 <hwoarang> anything else to discuss today? 14:25:24 <David_Orange> one thing 14:25:41 <hwoarang> yes 14:25:45 <David_Orange> just about PDF/IDF introduction for installer/scenarios 14:26:22 <David_Orange> i will propose some atomic patches (after ONS :)), but they will be based on https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/53893 14:26:52 <David_Orange> this is PDF/IDF for deployment in VM, with the same config we are using today 14:27:36 <David_Orange> the idea is to continue deploying on VM as today but more and more getting IPs and other POD values from PDF 14:27:56 <David_Orange> then introduce PDF/IDF from BM 14:28:19 <David_Orange> is there any comment/proposition about this subject or the way to do it ? 14:28:31 <hwoarang> #info David to introduce pdf/idf for installer/scenarios for VM and BM deployments 14:28:41 <hwoarang> David_Orange: how does that relate to your existing patches? 14:28:45 <hwoarang> because i got confused a bit 14:29:25 <David_Orange> the next patches will source those config files 14:29:38 <hwoarang> your patches do not contain IDF/PDF right? so i guess this is a continuation 14:30:16 <David_Orange> the stabilisation patches ? yes, they contains the same, and it is a continuation 14:30:45 <David_Orange> but with separate patches, to introducte them smothly 14:30:52 <David_Orange> smoothly 14:31:21 <hwoarang> ok so for me, it would look like this 1) get idf/pdf files 2) make bifrost deploy using idf/pdf so we keep XCI working 3) bring BM 14:31:23 <David_Orange> am i more clear ? 14:31:23 <hwoarang> something like that 14:31:37 <hwoarang> would that make sense? 14:32:06 <David_Orange> for now 1/2 is working with the proto 14:32:31 <hwoarang> yeah so i guess that also means start moving bits from proto to real xci correct? 14:32:50 <David_Orange> but not the 3, for the installers we need to introduce more template configs 14:33:34 <David_Orange> after review, yes, if it get the agreement 14:33:54 <OPNFV-Gerrit-Bot> Manuel Buil proposed releng-xci: Connect ODL CI-CD to XCI https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/53173 14:33:56 <hwoarang> ok then 14:34:24 <hwoarang> getting things in proto is easy for people to try. we will see how to bring them to xci after that 14:34:48 <hwoarang> thank you for your work btw 14:35:13 <David_Orange> hwoarang: yes, that is why it is better to keep it in proto to let reviewers review this large patches bundle 14:35:23 <David_Orange> hwoarang: thx 14:35:54 <David_Orange> and now this will be to introduce PDF/IDF in installers/proto 14:36:05 <hwoarang> ok thank you for the update 14:36:06 <hwoarang> anything else 14:36:13 <David_Orange> i know the PDF/IDF is a bit obscure, i hope i am clear 14:37:23 <David_Orange> hwoarang: from my side 14:37:26 <David_Orange> no 14:37:27 <hwoarang> yes it takes a bit to digest that 14:37:41 <hwoarang> anybody else? 14:37:48 <David_Orange> hwoarang: i understand that :) 14:38:00 <electrocucaracha> I have two patches that are not triggering jenkins jobs https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54125/ https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/54123/ 14:38:30 <electrocucaracha> should I need to resubmit them? 14:38:58 <hwoarang> electrocucaracha: no because changes in the VM script are being ignored 14:39:12 <hwoarang> for security reasons. if you mess with the VM script you can damage the host 14:39:19 <electrocucaracha> :O 14:39:33 <hwoarang> so need manual verification 14:40:08 <electrocucaracha> got it, in that case can you make the honors to take a look? 14:40:14 <electrocucaracha> hehehe 14:40:22 <hwoarang> yes I will 14:41:01 <hwoarang> anything else? 14:41:13 <electrocucaracha> and regarding the patch that renames bridges, we decided to offer different approach 14:41:25 <electrocucaracha> https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/52841/ 14:42:20 <electrocucaracha> David_Orange: suggested to have a variable for selected bridged or non-bridged networks 14:42:39 <hwoarang> i will review that too 14:43:06 <hwoarang> anything else? 14:43:06 <electrocucaracha> I offered the alternative to use based on the installer selected 14:43:08 <David_Orange> the fact is that kolla prefers to work on interfaces, not on bridges (like osa) 14:43:48 <David_Orange> electrocucaracha patch is to set or not the bridges 14:44:01 <David_Orange> electrocucaracha: i will do it tomorrow, thx :) 14:45:00 <hwoarang> ok understood 14:45:04 <electrocucaracha> yeah, the thing is that maybe we should consider to configure the networks differently for every installer 14:45:32 <electrocucaracha> pros more flexibility, cons we'll be loosing a reference 14:46:24 <hwoarang> let me review that patch to understand the big picture 14:46:32 <electrocucaracha> +1 14:46:40 <hwoarang> then we can discuss so i dont say stupid stuff right now 14:47:38 <hwoarang> ok unless there is something else to discuss we can end here for today 14:47:56 <David_Orange> thx hwoarang 14:48:03 <hwoarang> #endmeeting