13:00:31 <mbuil> #startmeeting XCI-biweekly
13:00:31 <collabot`> Meeting started Wed Sep 11 13:00:31 2019 UTC.  The chair is mbuil. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:31 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:00:31 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'xci_biweekly'
13:00:41 <mbuil> #topic rollcall
13:00:47 <mbuil> #info Manuel Buil
13:01:22 <nick_kar> #info Nikos Karandreas
13:02:37 <mbuil> hey nick_kar, how is it going?
13:03:02 <nick_kar> hey Manuel, i'm fine
13:03:13 <nick_kar> what about you?
13:03:36 <mbuil> Fine, I came yesterday from vacation
13:03:54 <nick_kar> have you had a good time?
13:03:58 <mbuil> let's wait one minute for more people to join
13:04:12 <mbuil> nick_kar: yes! It was a lot of work but fine ;)
13:04:39 <nick_kar> you worked in vacation??!
13:06:01 <mbuil> nick_kar: yes, I am part of an organization that organizes the big festivals in my town. We organize dinners, parties, concerts, hikes...
13:06:43 <nick_kar> I see, sounds interesting
13:07:00 <mbuil> yes, very rewarding :) but very intense
13:07:09 <mbuil> let's start but it seems it is only you and me :P
13:07:09 <nmimi> #info Nikos Mimigiannis
13:07:18 <mbuil> now we are three :D
13:07:24 <sarpkoksal> #info Sarp Köksal
13:07:45 <mbuil> hello nmimi and sarpkoksal
13:07:46 <nick_kar> four! :P
13:08:02 <sarpkoksal> hi Manuel
13:08:07 <nmimi> hi Manuel!
13:08:13 <dbalsige> hello everybody :)  this is the channel for the XCI meeting, right ?
13:08:17 <mbuil> this is the agenda we have, add topics if you want --> https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/xci-meetings
13:08:24 <mbuil> dbalsige: yes, it is
13:08:38 <dbalsige> hello Manuel
13:08:49 <mbuil> dbalsige: hello Daniel
13:08:50 <mbuil> #topic Meeting day/time/occurrence
13:08:59 <mbuil> #link https://doodle.com/poll/6eswe8pbgdifmp7i
13:09:43 <mbuil> #info we have a draw between this time and one hour earlier
13:10:04 <mbuil> sarpkoksal: you voted for one hour earlier, is 13h UTC ok for you too?
13:10:30 <mbuil> nmimi: same for you
13:11:00 <nmimi> yes it is fine for me
13:11:12 <sarpkoksal> I prefer 1 hour earlier but if it will be at 13h, it is okey for me
13:12:17 <mbuil> if nobody is against it, then let's leave it as it is. We can change it if somebody has problems in the future of course. ANybody against it?
13:13:06 <mbuil> #info: We keep the current slot 13h Wednesday bi-weekly
13:13:12 <mbuil> #topic OSH Integration
13:13:32 <mbuil> OSH = OpenStack Helm ;)
13:13:38 <mbuil> #info The integration is completed. We can deploy OpenStack-helm with XCI using mini and noha flavor. Both Ubuntu and opensuse are supported
13:14:01 <mbuil> #info There are a couple of problems that must be solved to fix the integration with functest
13:14:20 <mbuil> nmimi, nick_kar: did you have time to look at why there are problems with cinder? I did not
13:14:32 <nick_kar> i think that noha flavor fails
13:14:50 <nick_kar> before going to test-it script
13:15:05 <nick_kar> it started a couple of weeks ago
13:15:20 <mbuil> nick_kar: it was working for me two weeks ago but perhaps something broke in the meanwhile
13:15:30 <mbuil> three weeks ago, sorry
13:15:32 <mbuil> ok
13:15:36 <nick_kar> yes
13:15:57 <nick_kar> i hadn't chance to look at it
13:16:12 <nmimi> i haven't looked at it either
13:16:18 * fdegir in a parallel meeting and will try to join
13:16:27 <mbuil> #info: nick_kar noticed that noha is not working since a couple of weeks
13:16:28 <nick_kar> probably not before next week for me
13:16:57 <mbuil> I would also like to have a look but I am busy with other stuff too
13:17:16 <fdegir> i've been looking into cinder issue but my mini deployments failing
13:17:16 <mbuil> any other point to mention on this topic?
13:17:28 <nmimi> I think we should get cinder to be deployed with NFS
13:17:50 <nmimi> instead of the default one(CEPH)
13:17:58 <fdegir> i think one of the reasons why it fails to deploy cinder is deprecated get-all option to kubectl so we need an older (1.14) version of k8s for osh
13:17:59 <mbuil> fdegir: what step do you see failing?
13:18:18 <fdegir> show-all option, sorry
13:18:29 <fdegir> register ceph script is failing i think
13:18:51 <fdegir> i see ceph pods are up and when the scripts tries to do namespace registration, it fails due to that deprecated kubectl option
13:19:14 <mbuil> nmimi +1 to that. We should probably first make it work with NFS and then move to CEPH. I consider NFS easier to debug and less problematic
13:19:24 <fdegir> so i pin k8s to 1.14 versioin for osh osn-nosdn-nofeature scenario: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/releng-xci-scenarios/+/68435/3/scenarios/os-nosdn-nofeature/osh/xci_overrides
13:19:47 <fdegir> with nfs approach, we won't be able to introuduce functest
13:20:25 <fdegir> cinder is included in functest-healthcheck and if we enable functest-healthcheck, we won't be able to pass the verify gate
13:21:01 <fdegir> on top of cinder issue, one more testcase fails: tempest.api.identity.v3.test_domains.DefaultDomainTestJSON.test_default_domain_exists
13:21:10 <fdegir> which might be related to policy or whatever
13:21:22 <fdegir> so i think we are pretty close to enable functest if we can get cinder working
13:22:06 <fdegir> that's all from me for this topic
13:22:10 <fdegir> i'll keep trying
13:22:33 <mbuil> fdegir: but cinder could use NFS in the backend too. I saw that in the mini flavor we are not deploying cinder. We are mimicking what OSH is doing upstream in the gate where it tests everything. I wonder why they don't deploy cinder helm, I can ask
13:22:49 <fdegir> mbuil: that would help
13:23:02 <fdegir> i'm happy whatever way we can get cinder enabled
13:23:22 <mbuil> ok, let me ask, and come back with an answer
13:23:36 <dbalsige> is there any other reason going for cinder (NFS) than for cinder (CEPH) than complexity ?
13:23:56 <fdegir> i believe ceph is not tested in osh gates
13:24:03 <fdegir> i might be mistaken
13:24:17 <nick_kar> I agree with fdegir
13:24:40 <mbuil> brb
13:26:08 <fdegir> mbuil was saying xci osh works fine on baremetal as well so again, we are pretty close to get things in shape
13:26:20 <fdegir> need small touches
13:26:52 <fdegir> the next topic is How to track bugs and missing features
13:26:53 <fdegir> #topic How to track bugs and missing features
13:26:57 * fdegir is not chair
13:27:03 <mbuil> back
13:27:14 <mbuil> #chair fdegir
13:27:14 <collabot`> Current chairs: fdegir mbuil
13:27:23 <fdegir> #topic How to track bugs and missing features
13:27:42 <dbalsige> I would recommend using opnfv jira for bug tracking / features...
13:27:45 <fdegir> we have xci project on jira and there are some items there already
13:27:54 <mbuil> #info We have a releng-xci section in opnfv.jira
13:28:02 <mbuil> #link https://jira.opnfv.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?projectKey=XCI&rapidView=237&view=planning
13:28:50 <fdegir> i've been adding some items to the backlog while i was trying to make functest work
13:28:56 <mbuil> #info Our backlog has plenty of tasks. Everyone is welcome to pick one!
13:28:59 <fdegir> so you are welcomed to take over any tasks
13:29:15 <mbuil> is the link working for you? It is very slow for me?
13:29:39 <dbalsige> works good here
13:29:56 <mbuil> dbalsige: ok thanks
13:30:25 <mbuil> #topic XCI demo in the OPNFV booth at ONS Europe
13:30:41 <mbuil> #info XCI baremetal deployment demo was selected to be part of the OPNFV booth at ONS Europe
13:31:05 <mbuil> #info Currently mbuil is the only presenter. If somebody attends ONS Europe and would like to be part of the demo, that would be great
13:31:18 <dbalsige> great congrats manuel
13:31:21 <mbuil> anyone? ;)
13:31:28 <dbalsige> I will be at ONS
13:31:37 <dbalsige> I could join if it helps
13:31:56 <fdegir> i arrive wednesday evening, missing ons
13:32:16 <mbuil> dbalsige: I think it is already too late to make it official but for sure it would be nice if you can cover me a couple of hours so that the booth is not empty
13:32:57 <fdegir> anyone plans to attend to CNTT meeting?
13:33:05 <mbuil> fdegir: me
13:33:12 <dbalsige> clear ! that was the proposal. of course I can help you out for some hours..
13:33:43 <fdegir> dbalsige: are you staying for CNTT?
13:35:07 <dbalsige> fdegir: When will it take place ?
13:35:18 <fdegir> dbalsige: thursday and friday
13:35:38 <fdegir> details: https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/CNTT+Developer+F2F+Workshop%2C+Sept+%2719
13:35:56 <fdegir> you need to register and registration is free
13:37:05 <fdegir> mbuil: next topic?
13:37:14 <dbalsige> fdegir: thx I will try to make it. I will have to adjust my travel plans
13:37:20 <mbuil> #topic Dovetail Support
13:37:33 <fdegir> dbalsige: i think there will be discussiions around xci during that
13:37:36 <mbuil> not sure who brought this one into the agenda. It was there last time
13:38:02 <fdegir> mbuil: not sure
13:38:06 <mbuil> I guess panos but he is not in the meeting
13:38:48 <mbuil> let's move on
13:38:49 <mbuil> #topic Documentation
13:39:05 <mbuil> #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/c/releng-xci/+/68390
13:39:17 <mbuil> #info please review it if you have time
13:39:22 <mbuil> I updated part of our documentation
13:39:44 <mbuil> oh, I have just realized fdegir reviewed it
13:39:52 <mbuil> please -1 it ;)
13:39:54 <fdegir> you see
13:40:07 <fdegir> got your -1
13:40:27 * mbuil adding it to my backlog
13:41:14 <mbuil> #topic Supporting multiple vlans per physical int
13:41:41 <mbuil> I think this comes from Parker. I'll tell him to add this to the Jira so that it becomes a task there and can be tracked
13:42:18 <mbuil> #topic Tungsten Fabric integration into XCI
13:42:26 <mbuil> Is anybody from TF in the meeting?
13:43:12 <fdegir> mbuil: we can perhaps add a task to the backlog for TF integration and assign it to the guys
13:43:28 <fdegir> to Alex perhaps
13:43:51 <mbuil> I know they are working upstream in OSH with that. For example --> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663390/
13:44:16 <mbuil> fdegir: ok. Let me contact Alex and ask him
13:44:29 <mbuil> #topic aob
13:44:36 <mbuil> anyone?
13:45:09 <fdegir> not from me
13:45:30 <mbuil> ok, then let's close it here
13:45:38 <mbuil> #endmeeting