#opnfv-polestar: Polestar #11

Meeting started by margaret at 15:12:21 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. reiterated that Model WG is where VNF onboarding and lifecycle will get worked (margaret, 15:12:45)
    2. Model WG is working with OPEN-O on models (margaret, 15:13:34)
    3. Bryan Sullivan explains there is a process on the model wiki on getting involved (margaret, 15:14:09)
    4. ACTION: Bryan will beef up model wiki on how to get engaged more effectively (margaret, 15:14:56)
    5. Model WG needs much more participation to work VNF on boarding and life cycle actions (margaret, 15:15:26)
    6. Git repo for models are in the model WG (margaret, 15:15:53)
    7. Bryan is inviting anyone to help organize model better and even be PTL if they want (margaret, 15:16:43)
    8. rprakash (rprakash, 15:19:22)
    9. Uli (in loud environment, cannot speak) (ulik, 15:20:25)
    10. Real-time performance monitoring and fast fault detection : can be covered by SFQM; note SFQM is changing scope (bjskerry, 15:29:49)
    11. Pain Points listed by EUG is not necessaryly the use stories/ use csese listed are not implemented in OPNFV (rprakash, 15:35:58)
    12. But it apears the there is no mapping between these and how it is done to be documented in OPNFV (rprakash, 15:36:57)
    13. it could be assigned to one or more projects in OPNFV and cfeating Jira Tickets to track and some resource assigned to complete the task (rprakash, 15:38:03)
    14. Need focussed effort from all sides and Doc side has some bandwidth to really expand beyond users documentation (rprakash, 15:40:03)
    15. Same holds true for Models, all need more resources to address this (rprakash, 15:40:34)
    16. Brian Skerry (bjskerry, 15:40:45)
    17. Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 15:40:57)
    18. ACTION: alternate is to add comments the table in EUG of pain points to int to prjects in OPNFV etc. (rprakash, 15:43:12)
    19. pain poin tables in EUG is being updated and appears that brings lot of new points and listed herein (rprakash, 15:56:48)
    20. mulitle projects correspond to a pain point and needs considerations as to how to resolve it (rprakash, 15:58:09)
    21. margaret chiosi (margaret, 16:01:27)
    22. yes i did start meeting (margaret, 16:01:54)
    23. can chair end the meeting or? (rprakash, 16:01:55)
    24. call will now move back to 11 AM EST due to too many 9AM conflicts with other OPNFV calls (margaret, 16:03:02)


Meeting ended at 16:03:12 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. Bryan will beef up model wiki on how to get engaged more effectively
  2. alternate is to add comments the table in EUG of pain points to int to prjects in OPNFV etc.


People present (lines said)

  1. rprakash (15)
  2. margaret (14)
  3. collabot (4)
  4. ulik (4)
  5. bjskerry (2)
  6. bryan_att (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.