#opnfv-polestar: polestar

Meeting summary

1. 1. Margaret (margaret, 15:50:10)
   2. Uli (uli-k, 16:08:49)
   3. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EUAG/Pain+Points (bryan_att, 16:12:10)
   4. Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 16:12:21)
   5. Tim Irnich (timirnich, 16:12:39)
   6. Bryan stated that the EUG case of invocation and deletion of services is already being actively worked orchestra for Open Baton, Opera for Open Baton and suggests that Polestar team does not need to work this (margaret, 16:14:48)
   7. IDEA: Bryan has proposed to work resiliency at scale as the next item to work. If there aren't any other opinions on what to work next - propose to work this next. This will help us create a framework for the other items. Next meeting folks can propose other areas to work given time to review (margaret, 16:23:01)
   8. an example of what AT&T is doing in the cloud-native (control plane) space: https://github.com/att-comdev/openstack-helm - we need to do more of this type of thing in OPNFV (bryan_att, 16:27:46)
   9. https://techdiscuss.opnfv.org (pjlynch, 16:47:43)
   10. Ash created a discussion category of polestar with an initial topic of resiliency at scale. We will have our discussions there and not during our polestar meeting. (margaret, 16:53:24)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. margaret (6)
2. bryan_att (3)
3. collabot (3)
4. pjlynch (1)
5. timirnich (1)
6. uli-k (1)