14:31:01 <debrascott> #startmeeting Brahmaputra Daily Standup
14:31:01 <collabot> Meeting started Thu Jan  7 14:31:01 2016 UTC.  The chair is debrascott. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:31:01 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:31:01 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'brahmaputra_daily_standup'
14:31:13 <debrascott> #topic rollcall
14:31:35 <debrascott> #info Debra
14:31:36 <anac1> #info Ana Cunha
14:32:39 <debrascott> topic is roll call
14:33:04 <joekidder> sorry I'm late...didn't see the irc in the pile of links.
14:33:18 <trozet_> #info Tim Rozet
14:33:25 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
14:33:40 <debrascott> joekidder: no problem, a number of people are still active on the weekly tech call
14:33:43 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooepr
14:33:45 <joekidder> #info Joe Kidder
14:34:12 <morgan_orange> #info Morgan Richomme
14:34:51 <trevor_intel> #undo
14:34:59 <debrascott> #topic Milestone E status
14:35:04 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper
14:35:35 <debrascott> #info Projects reporting: 29
14:36:02 <debrascott> #info: Projects who have not yet reported: 9
14:36:03 <debrascott> DPACC
14:36:05 <debrascott> Moon
14:36:07 <debrascott> Movie
14:36:08 <debrascott> NFV for KVM
14:36:09 <debrascott> Policy Test
14:36:11 <debrascott> Resource Scheduler
14:36:12 <debrascott> SDNVPN
14:36:13 <debrascott> Service Function Chaining
14:36:14 <bin_> #info Bin Hu
14:36:14 <debrascott> VNFFG
14:36:25 <[1]JonasB> #info Jonas Bjurel
14:36:36 <fdegir> #info Not reported projects: DPACC, Moon, Movie, NFV for KVM, Policy Test, Resource Scheduler, SDNVPN, SFC
14:36:49 <debrascott> #info Key Issues:
14:36:50 <debrascott> 1. Lab infrastructure not fully up:
14:36:52 <morgan_orange> Moon has never been Release B candidate...
14:37:00 <debrascott> thanks fdegir
14:37:04 <fdegir> debrascott: you typed in 8 projects
14:37:06 <fdegir> 1 missing
14:37:38 <anac1> fdegir: VNFFG
14:37:49 <fdegir> #info And VNFFG not reported
14:37:55 <fdegir> sorry
14:37:57 <fdegir> missed it
14:38:24 <debrascott> #info Key Issues:
14:38:40 <debrascott> #info 1. Lab infrastructure not fully up:
14:38:59 <fdegir> #info As of now, we have 4 fully operational PODs
14:39:02 <debrascott> #info 2. None of the 4 installers has fully completed integration checks with all components. In some cases this is due to troubleshooting issues, in others it is due to component availability (OpenContrail & ONOS) with the right lab infrastructure
14:39:13 <fdegir> #info 2 under verification
14:39:25 <fdegir> #info 1 network troubleshooting
14:39:27 <debrascott> #info  3. Minimal Scenario definitions are pending which impacts CI & some test projects.
14:39:45 <morgan_orange> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page
14:39:49 <fdegir> #info 1 pending VPN access
14:39:52 <debrascott> #info  4.  A number of projects have not yet prioritized their open issues and so are not able to determine which issues to defer.
14:39:58 <morgan_orange> #info page updated to track the scenario
14:40:04 <fdegir> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_labs#status_of_production_ci_resources_for_release_b
14:40:13 <fdegir> can we report each item one by one
14:40:18 <debrascott> #info 6. A couple feature projects do not have working deployment yet and may be at risk of missing this release
14:40:23 <debrascott> oops missed #5
14:40:39 <debrascott> #info 5. Nearly all projects are still working on documentation
14:41:13 <debrascott> #info 7. A number of feature projects have not yet had opportunity to test in a Pharos lab, creating risk for test projects
14:42:43 <debrascott> that’s it
14:43:43 <debrascott> one question I have is what is the drop dead date for fixing ANY bugs in order to reach Feb 2?
14:45:26 <debrascott> ie: when is last build with time for minor regression testing?
14:46:01 <debrascott> #topic Hot issues
14:46:10 <debrascott> any additional issues to above?
14:46:35 <morgan_orange> 5 is not really an issue...
14:47:13 <debrascott> morgan_orange: agree low priority since we have plan in place to accomodate for this release
14:47:57 <morgan_orange> for info 2, we mention onos and opencontrail, but soo far we do not have also arno scenario available as well
14:48:06 <morgan_orange> i.e.odl
14:48:39 <debrascott> #info issue #2 also do not have Arno (ODL) available
14:49:29 <morgan_orange> for the test scenarios, I updated the page https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page
14:49:42 <morgan_orange> A table for the available scenario (the one for which we have a jenkins job in CI)
14:49:57 <morgan_orange> A table for the candidate scenario (people are identify to lead the scenario)
14:50:01 <debrascott> ODL availability is lab availability issue isn’t it? not troubleshooting issues?
14:50:11 <morgan_orange> I also updated the page project to try to put the projects into a scenario
14:50:26 <morgan_orange> but it has to be checked by the project
14:50:54 <morgan_orange> for odl: labs are available...
14:51:11 <morgan_orange> joid has an integration, apex also but in virtual mode (lab issue)
14:51:41 <morgan_orange> compass has also a virtual mode but has a bm deployment without odl
14:52:05 <morgan_orange> so difficult to say, except apex that had lab issue, for the other, as far as I understand it is not a problem of lab
14:53:11 <morgan_orange> it is more a question for the installer project ...
14:53:37 <debrascott> yes was just looking if we have representation- they were all invited
14:54:14 <debrascott> I don’t see Artur on or Narinder
14:54:56 <debrascott> also don’t see Weidong— will ping them
14:56:19 <debrascott> trozet: is this correct that Apex issue for completing integration validation of all components is a lab issue only?
14:56:42 <trozet> debrascott: Not really
14:57:03 <trozet> debrascott: we havent integrated contrail yet
14:57:16 <trozet> debrascott: ODL is done
14:57:27 <debrascott> what is the holdup on integrating contrail?
14:57:29 <trozet> debrascott: onos is pending CI
14:58:25 <debrascott> trozet: by CI you mean development of Jenkins job?
14:58:44 <trozet> debrascott: the folks that are integrating it upstream for us are not responsive, and the status is unknown, and we havent had the time to try to integrate it ourselves yet
14:59:10 <trozet> debrascott: well CI was broken until it got fixed last night, then broke again last night due to upstream problems, which im trying to put an end to this morning
14:59:26 <trozet> debrascott: so the ONOS patch is sitting there waiting to be verified in CI when CI is back up
15:00:03 <anac1> i have to leave, have another meeting now
15:00:22 <debrascott> trozet who are you reaching out to for contrail?
15:00:28 <morgan_orange> same for me
15:00:34 <morgan_orange> I have to leave
15:00:38 <trozet> debrascott: since im already giving status, the LF POD1 baremetal pod looks to be functioning again, so im working on baremetal deployment in LF lab today
15:00:55 <trozet> debrascott: stuart mackie and some other folks inside of red hat who were supposed to be doing the integration
15:01:00 <debrascott> trozet: thanks
15:01:34 <debrascott> trozet: anything we can to to escalate?
15:02:11 <trozet> debrascott: at this point we need to get CI stable again and stop this madness of upstream breaking us, then get ONOS and baremetal through
15:02:34 <trozet> debrascott: then we will look at opencontrail, but maybe stuart could apply more pressure on his end to get things going
15:03:22 <debrascott> trozet: yes I understand heads down for now but need to continue in parallel so opencontrail is ready when you are. Will contact Stuart for you.
15:04:02 <debrascott> I think we need to make this meeting longer as we dont get through agenda. Maybe just temporarily until we get through the knotholes
15:04:08 <[1]JonasB> Contrail is an issue for Fuel as well, the contrail team doesnt have people to help out
15:04:56 <debrascott> Ok do we need to drop Contrail support for this release? What impact would that have overall?
15:05:39 <[1]JonasB> debrascott: That is being voted on in Genesis
15:06:07 <debrascott> JonasB: ok- let me know outcome. When is the vote?
15:07:51 <debrascott> #info we are past the meeting time & key people are dropping off. Will work offline to make progress on these stated issues. For tomorrow will lengthen this meeting to 1 hour.
15:08:11 <trozet> debrascott: I think maybe you should join our weekly genesis meetings, we could probably use your input, and might give you better visibility
15:08:19 <trozet> frankbrockners: ^
15:09:06 <debrascott> trozet: I’ve tried but must have wrong meeting info.
15:09:24 <debrascott> will contact frank
15:09:27 <trozet> debrascott: ok lets see if frankbrockners can add you
15:10:00 <trozet> debrascott: i think maybe it would also be useful to have a release ops meeting like you did for the first 30 min, overall project status, then maybe another 30 min for installers only
15:10:20 <debrascott> thanks all for joining. We’ll chat again tomorrow
15:10:32 <debrascott> #endmeeting