14:30:26 <debrascott> #startmeeting Brahmaputra Daily Standup 14:30:26 <collabot`> Meeting started Thu Jan 14 14:30:26 2016 UTC. The chair is debrascott. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:30:26 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:30:26 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'brahmaputra_daily_standup' 14:30:33 <debrascott> #topic roll call 14:30:44 <debrascott> #info debra 14:30:58 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners 14:31:02 <anac1> #info Ana Cunha 14:31:06 <bin_> #info Bin Hu 14:31:07 <joekidder> #info Joe Kidder 14:31:11 <ashyoung> #info Ashlee Young 14:31:29 <frankbrockners> #link draft agenda for today: https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/minutes#jan142016 14:31:33 <[1]JonasB> #info Jonas Bjurel 14:31:33 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper 14:31:39 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci 14:32:45 <debrascott> #topic Hardware / POD status 14:32:46 <debrascott> Is https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_labs#status_of_production_ci_resources_for_release_b up to date? 14:33:15 <fdegir> #info POD/HW status is same as yesterday 14:33:27 <fdegir> #info The page is up to date, reflecting current status 14:33:33 <debrascott> ok good lets move on 14:33:56 <debrascott> #Topic Scenarios status (Definition, Deployment status) 14:34:41 <debrascott> Morgan_Orange did you cleanup these webpages?https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page#available_scenarios clean up (AI: Morgan) 14:34:42 <debrascott> https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page#candidate_scenarios clean up (AI: Morgan) 14:34:50 <fdegir> should I give short status regarding naming? 14:34:52 <morgan_orange1> I tried 14:35:01 <morgan_orange1> but I think we should remove the table available scenario 14:35:12 <morgan_orange1> as available scenario are available on the jenkins page 14:35:15 <morgan_orange1> it is more accurate 14:35:20 <fdegir> #info Short scenario naming convention is applied to Fuel and Joid. WIP with Compass 14:35:27 <fdegir> #info Jenkins Job structuring/naming convention is applied to Compass, Fuel, and Joid 14:35:32 <fdegir> #info Details are on 14:35:38 <fdegir> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/brahmaputra_testing_page#scenario_and_jenkins_job_naming_scheme 14:35:50 <fdegir> #info The jobs can be seen on 14:36:02 <fdegir> #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/OPNFV%20Platform%20CI%20-%20Alternative%20View/ 14:36:58 <morgan_orange1> I would suggest to rely only on the jenkins view for the available scenario (remove from the wiki page) and keep a table for the candidate scenario until they are implemented 14:37:24 <debrascott> morga_orange1: just so long as everyone can find easily and access easily 14:38:08 <[1]JonasB> I added one scenario for virtual traffic classifyer which apparently need VLAN segmentation 14:38:26 <debrascott> morgan_orange1: why would you remove after they are implemented? 14:39:03 <morgan_orange1> because they are no more cnadidate, they become available scenario 14:39:30 <frankbrockners> +1 on removing the "available" table 14:39:30 <[1]JonasB> morgan_orange1: Do we want to add vlan segmentation as a scenario candidate? 14:39:35 <debrascott> morgan_orange1: OK, that makes sense 14:39:47 <frankbrockners> let's add the above link to the wiki instead 14:39:56 <debrascott> +1 14:40:26 <frankbrockners> ah - link is already there... 14:40:26 <narindergupta> #info Narinder Gupta 14:40:35 <frankbrockners> so no need to do anything but remove 14:41:28 <frankbrockners> can we move to installers? 14:41:55 <debrascott> #topic Install/Deploy tools - 1-line status summaries 14:42:33 <debrascott> JonasB one line update please 14:42:42 <[1]JonasB> #info Fuel 8 rebasement done, work/race ongoing with rebasing the plugins. Scenarios are done to the point I think is needed, we can add more later 14:42:49 <frankbrockners> narindergupta, [1]JonasB, weidong, trozet - any updates? 14:42:51 <narindergupta> for joid installer i am seeing few failure which i will be fixing it today. 14:42:58 <frankbrockners> thanks [1]JonasB 14:43:03 <[1]JonasB> #info Most of the scenarios run for Stable and Master 14:43:20 <debrascott> #info trozet sent out his report in email again 14:43:49 <[1]JonasB> #info One more plugin will be integrated this week, it's for the policy framework 14:44:09 <[1]JonasB> #info end fuel report, questions? 14:44:38 <debrascott> #info not much change in Apex from yesterday 14:44:46 <debrascott> thanks JonasB 14:44:58 <trozet_> I'll have a report sent this afternoon 14:45:03 <trozet_> Driving atm 14:45:09 <narindergupta> #info for joid installer i am seeing few failure which i will be fixing it today. 14:45:09 <debrascott> narindergupta?? 14:45:37 <debrascott> trozet will include it in my daily- thanks 14:46:34 <debrascott> narindergupta: any progress with OpenContrail plugin for JOID? 14:46:59 <narindergupta> opencontrai nitration is complete 14:47:15 <debrascott> Yeah! 14:47:34 <debrascott> Are we ready to move to test status? 14:47:35 <[1]JonasB> narindergupta: Is this OpenContrail + Liberty? 14:47:40 <narindergupta> debrascott, we have plugin in joid but few bug fix needs to be done by juniper team for liberty 14:48:28 <narindergupta> open contrail + kilo has tested an liberty changes needed in charm not in joid. Which juniper team is working on. 14:48:47 <debrascott> narindergupta: thank you. I understand. 14:48:56 <narindergupta> onos also plugin is availble in joid 14:49:13 <debrascott> narindergupta: excellent 14:49:19 <narindergupta> and huwaie team is working on charms and few correction 14:49:45 <narindergupta> but from joid prospective we can deploy today through joid 14:50:21 <narindergupta> any other question debrascott ? 14:50:30 <debrascott> No, thnk you 14:50:36 <debrascott> Lets move on to test 14:50:59 <debrascott> #topic Testing status 14:51:51 <debrascott> morgan_orange1: functest status? 14:51:57 <morgan_orange1> #info functest troubleshooting in progress 14:52:46 <debrascott> morgan_orange1: what issues? 14:53:19 <morgan_orange1> #info wiki pages initiated to have a summary per testcases https://wiki.opnfv.org/functextnexttaks 14:53:33 <morgan_orange1> lots of tests failed (mainly network issues) 14:54:35 * frankbrockners wonders who came up with "functextnexttaks" 14:54:37 <morgan_orange1> and integration of companion projects 14:54:46 <morgan_orange1> just started (promise, onos) 14:55:01 <morgan_orange1> lacking also stability from one run to another 14:55:10 * frankbrockners would have expected functestnexttasks :-) 14:55:34 <morgan_orange1> https://wiki.opnfv.org/vping_brahmaputra_page 14:55:43 <morgan_orange1> https://wiki.opnfv.org/vims_brahmaputra_page 14:55:52 <morgan_orange1> https://wiki.opnfv.org/tempest_brahmaputra_page 14:57:15 <debrascott> morgan_orange1: those are helpful 14:57:45 <ashyoung> Quick question: what's holding up any of the onos-related test cases from getting status? 14:57:50 <debrascott> where are you at in troubleshooting? still fault analysis? 14:57:51 <morgan_orange1> but almost unmainable...I would expect that dashboarding would provide something more consistent and easy to maintain... 14:58:12 <debrascott> +1 that 14:58:13 <morgan_orange1> but the prototype I saw does not answer to my expectation 14:58:21 <debrascott> that’s needed 14:58:54 <debrascott> before we move to talk about dashboard pls answer above questions 14:58:56 <frankbrockners> folks - just a note on meeting hygene 14:58:57 <morgan_orange1> ashyoung: I thing the integration started, we have now onos labs so it should be ok 14:59:06 <frankbrockners> can we #info some of the points said here? 14:59:20 <ashyoung> awesome! 14:59:41 <anac1> #info yardstick: for fuel: odl scenario fails (ssh timeout), for compass: working last night, however one new fault found today, for joid: troubleshooting, for apex: started yardstick integration on baremetal with help from apex team 15:00:07 <anac1> have to leave for another meeting 15:00:32 <debrascott> anac1: ty, yes we are top of the hour again. 15:00:50 <ashyoung> thanks!!! 15:01:02 <debrascott> #info if we did not get to your status please send me an email 15:01:20 <debrascott> #endmeeting