14:30:11 #startmeeting Brahmaputra Daily Standup 14:30:11 Meeting started Wed Jan 27 14:30:11 2016 UTC. The chair is debrascott. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:30:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:30:11 The meeting name has been set to 'brahmaputra_daily_standup' 14:30:16 #topic roll call 14:30:32 #info Ashlee Young 14:30:39 #info Bin Hu 14:30:47 #info Ana Cunha 14:30:50 #info Chris Price 14:30:58 #link agenda https://wiki.opnfv.org/releases/brahmaputra/minutes 14:30:59 #info Narinder Gupta 14:31:14 #info Jonas Bjurel 14:32:11 #topic Install/Deploy tools status 14:32:27 uabjonb: How is Fuel doing today? 14:32:31 #info HEather Kirksey 14:32:38 #info Morgan Richomme 14:32:51 I spoke with Jonas today, can fill in if no-one else is on 14:32:56 #info Fatih Degirmenci 14:32:57 #info We are ready with all Fuel rebasement and have started regression test of scenarios. 14:33:08 * ChrisPriceAB wipes his brow in relief 14:33:24 ChrisPriceAB +1 14:33:35 #info Hope that we are lucky with regressin and can start to cherry-pick tomorrow. 14:33:53 #info Today it looks good, but one day at the time 14:33:56 end 14:33:58 uabjonb: prognosis toward freezing on Friday? 14:34:09 Looks good 14:34:26 uabjonb: should we set freeze time end of day Pacific? 14:35:07 I dont understand what that means, but we should have all in stable by then 14:35:46 #info I would like to get input on freezing as I will address the TSC to vote on that today. Is end of day Friday (PST) suitable? 14:36:14 more to the point are there issue with setting that time/date for anyone? 14:37:12 * ChrisPriceAB senses consensus that this is not an issue and just to go ahead. 14:37:16 what does that mean to testing ? can we do changes in the code (fix bugs) for scenarios that are not working after the freeze date ? 14:37:24 I dont have an issue with that 14:37:37 anac1: Bugfixes yes, but all test cases should be merged by then. 14:38:34 yes, merged - but not all have been successfully run yet, so we will need to push code changes to fix 14:38:48 is the permitted ? 14:38:54 this* 14:39:16 I would hope the test case is functional but I can understand the race condition to getting the scenario's in place to validate the test cases. 14:39:32 ChrisPriceAB: another thing discussed yesterday is a need to define what “critical” bugs are. We don’t want anyone to waste time on something that can be documented. Could you bring this discussion up with TSC as well? With distinction between what is critical to feature project vs what is critical to test project? 14:39:35 Same with Fuel, there will be bug patches comming in as we continue to test and find fault 14:39:52 So if I interpret the question the way I want to then it's fine. :D 14:40:26 debrascott: Ok I will draft something on the thread that we should repond to if it seen to be unreasonable. 14:40:45 ChrisPriceAB: thanks! 14:41:06 I do believe the project committers are generally the most competent people to identify what is critical to getting across the line. I prefer to make sure the line is well defined. :D 14:41:07 Quick updates from Apex/Joid/Compass please… 14:41:46 ChrisPriceAB: +1 14:41:57 trozet: Apex? 14:42:06 narindergupta: JOID? 14:42:09 debrascott: for JOID no status change from yesterday. We are good and functest are running on all deployments 14:42:52 end 14:42:55 narindergupta: and ODL test suite was fully OK on Orange POD yesterday, so shall be OK on all joid PODs 14:42:56 * ChrisPriceAB cheers ! 14:43:24 looks like we are missing trozet today, expect Apex is still working on plugin for Contrail 14:43:37 #Topic test status 14:43:46 morgan_orange: functest? 14:44:18 for apex as mentioned yesterday it would be great to have jobs with ocl not opencontrail, otherwise we will need to distinguish both for the same scenario 14:44:37 it will be easy for tests.. 14:44:45 #info functest frozen since several weeks.. (no new testcases, only bug fix + integration in progress) 14:44:50 #info functest: first succesful run of promise test suite last night! next step could consist in pushing the results in DB (but is it allowed under code freeze...) 14:44:57 #info functest: first test on scenario sdnvpn in progress at the moment... 14:45:02 #info functest: no news on ocl integration 14:45:07 #info functest: testcases onos, odl, tempest and rally almost OK ..need to run on stable SUT 4 times in a raw 14:45:12 #info functest: troubleshooting on vPing (impossible to retrieve floating iP with odl_l3 and onos scenario) and vIMS (if no vPing, no vIMS...) 14:45:17 #info functest: difference on the results despite same installer/same test/same scenario => influence of Hardware probably understimated (show a Jira on intel POD 5 & 6 connectivity issues) 14:45:21 #info functest: wiki pages updated 14:45:31 #info functest: alternate dashboard in progress (less nice than Kibana but better than wiki manual update) - hope could show something tomorrow. 14:45:38 morgan_orange: you don't have any problem to run SSH ? 14:46:06 yes we have trouble for the vPing/ssh 14:46:13 for old_l3 scenario 14:46:35 and works for odl_l2 scenario ? 14:46:56 I think so, need to sync with Jose, he is struggling with vPing/SSH scenario 14:47:09 ONOS need an to own an public interface to get L3 and floating working. Not according to Pharos setup. 14:47:26 morgan_orange: ok, thanks 14:47:43 we ecluded vPing /ssh and vIMS from ONOS scenario 14:48:05 morgan_orange: applause! good progress with scenarios 14:48:40 morgan_orange: done? 14:48:45 yes 14:48:54 anac1: yardstick? 14:49:44 #info yardstick has similar, if not the same problem, as functest - with SSH 14:50:07 #info problems to troubleshoot on CI POD 14:50:33 #info the time proposed here: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_labs#production_ci_resources_reservation is not followed 14:51:17 #info during joid run last night, strange interruption on CI POD caused yardstick no-sdn scenario to fail after running 3 test cases succesffully 14:51:18 It is super important that we respect this and dont jump on each others toes! 14:52:03 #Action Debra to send notice to community on importance to adhere to schedule https://wiki.opnfv.org/pharos_rls_b_labs#production_ci_resources_reservation 14:52:13 that table for POD reservation was sent out for review/comments and no feedback has been recevied yet 14:52:17 except from yardstick 14:52:20 we need to have guidelines/procedure to not interrupt each other truobleshooting actibvities or CI runs 14:52:41 anac1: +1 14:52:50 fdegir: no feedback means accepted 14:52:58 we test on virtual before going to baremetal 14:53:11 debrascott: then people should go there and book timeslots 14:53:20 which hasn't happened as of yet 14:53:24 except yardstick 14:53:29 fdegir: yes- hence my action to send out a notice 14:53:35 thanks 14:53:44 it is important to stress that 14:54:01 anac1: more on yardstick? 14:54:11 the stable PODs will be busy with automatic runs so it is good to keep this in ming while adding times/reservation there 14:54:19 mind 14:54:37 debrascott: when we get time to troubleshoot in the POD, i will have more info 14:54:40 fdegir: will make sure to emphasis this 14:54:52 anac1: ok 14:55:30 anac1: readiness to freeze test cases on Friday? 14:55:57 no new test cases are being added - bug fixes on test cases and scenarios 14:56:11 anac1: is sfc test case complete then? 14:56:27 no, not run yet, but is under troubleshooting 14:56:50 anac1: ok, I understand. It is coded and merged, not validated 14:57:15 not validated, correct 14:57:32 lets move on to project status then 14:57:45 #topic feature project status 14:58:09 StuartMackie: anything new from Apex on the Contrail plugin? 14:58:49 I didn't hear anything 14:59:08 OK will ping trozet later 14:59:20 Do we have anyone on for ARM today? 14:59:46 Any other projects want to give us an update? 14:59:48 debrascott: fdegir: anac1 we will have an issue for troubleshooting on Apex - only 1 POD and not able to start before 18 UTC... 14:59:53 #info opnfvdocs have work ongoing for all central docs and are working on scenario explanation and definition aspects. 15:00:20 morgan_orange: debrascott: I think trozet and jmorgan1 are working on it 15:00:21 #info opnfvdocs pending working on outstanding project docs patches. to do tonight/tomorrow 15:00:39 all for now 15:00:40 morgan_orange: debrascott: the details are on #opnfv-pharos channel 15:01:03 fdegir: thanks will take a look. I know you were waiting for validation, correct? 15:01:05 to get Intel POD2 working 15:01:21 according to trozet, Internet connectivity to the pod seems more stable now 15:01:29 and he will try virtual deployment there 15:01:46 debrascott: that's right, we need trozet to try bare metal deploy there 15:01:50 and come back with updates 15:02:02 fdegir: ok will ping him about that when I get other status 15:02:07 ok 15:02:16 top of the hour again….fun continues 15:02:25 thanks all for attending!! 15:02:31 #endmeeting