======================================
#opnfv-release: OPNFV Colorado Release
======================================


Meeting started by dmcbride at 15:00:47 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2016/opnfv-release.2016-08-16-15.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (dmcbride, 15:00:57)
  * David McBride  (dmcbride, 15:01:03)
  * Jack Morgan (Pharos)  (jmorgan1, 15:01:12)
  * Sofia Wallin  (sofiawallin, 15:01:22)
  * Dan Lilliehorn (ARMBand/Enea)  (dali`, 15:01:24)
  * Florin Dumitrascu (armband)  (florind, 15:01:31)
  * kubi  (kubi001, 15:01:31)
  * Gerald Kunzmann  (GeraldK, 15:01:36)
  * Chris Price  (ChrisPriceAB, 15:01:39)
  * Narinder Gupta  (narindergupta, 15:01:51)
  * Morgan Richomme (Functest)  (morgan_orange, 15:02:41)
  * Maryam Tahhan  (mtahhan__, 15:04:36)
  * Tim Irnich (SDN VPN)  (timirnich, 15:16:26)
  * Greg Elkinbard  (Greg_E_, 15:18:25)

* release meeting next week during LinuxCon  (dmcbride, 15:18:56)
  * proposal is to change meeting time to one hour earlier (i.e. 7 a.m.
    PST), immediately following the TSC meeting  (dmcbride, 15:20:06)
  * TSC and release calls will be conducted from onsite at the OPNFV
    hackfest  (dmcbride, 15:20:40)

* stable branch and release participation  (dmcbride, 15:22:22)
  * simply moving features forward to updated environment is valid and
    sufficient for participation in the release  (dmcbride, 15:25:43)
  * however, projects still need to be able to pass deployment and test
    requirements for the current release  (dmcbride, 15:28:28)

* Documentation  (dmcbride, 15:35:09)
  * documentation incomplete  (dmcbride, 15:35:50)
  * hoping to wrap up documentation by next week  (dmcbride, 15:36:05)
  * requirements for documentation for test projects incomplete
    (dmcbride, 15:37:22)
  * test projects will continue to document their project using the same
    template and requirements as other projects  (dmcbride, 15:37:54)

* scenario status  (dmcbride, 15:48:57)
  * there should be no constraint for testing on using a particular POD
    (e.g. LF POD)  (dmcbride, 15:51:34)
  * DanSmithEricsson points out that we lack standardization across
    Pharos PODs, which complicates the issue of using all POD resources
    for OPNFV testing  (dmcbride, 15:54:10)
  * Fatih mentions that test runs need to be done in a CI POD as its a
    release criteria requirment  (jmorgan1, 15:56:54)
  * clarification - testing must be done on CI PODs  (dmcbride,
    15:57:09)



Meeting ended at 16:01:59 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* dmcbride (20)
* jmorgan1 (11)
* Greg_E_ (5)
* fdegir (4)
* collabot (3)
* ChrisPriceAB (2)
* frankbrockners (1)
* mtahhan__ (1)
* GeraldK (1)
* timirnich (1)
* morgan_orange (1)
* florind (1)
* sofiawallin (1)
* kubi001 (1)
* narindergupta (1)
* dali` (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4