====================================== #opnfv-release: OPNFV Colorado Release ====================================== Meeting started by dmcbride at 15:02:46 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2016/opnfv-release.2016-09-06-15.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (dmcbride, 15:02:53) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 15:03:04) * Chris Price (ChrisPriceAB, 15:03:06) * Dan Lilliehorn (Enea/ARMBand) (dali`, 15:03:16) * Bin Hu (bin_, 15:03:31) * Florin Dumitrascu (Enea) (florind, 15:03:47) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 15:04:18) * kubi (kubi001, 15:04:30) * Stuart Mackie (StuartMackie, 15:05:14) * Jack Morgan (Pharos) (jmorgan1, 15:07:36) * Greg Elkinbard (Greg_E_, 15:09:02) * Morgan Richomme (morgan_orange, 15:09:13) * #topic Open Daylight (dmcbride, 15:09:27) * LINK: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/ZcXhlh98/ (frankbrockners, 15:09:44) * Narinder Gupta (narindergupta, 15:10:15) * ODL project is having problems with the Boron release (dmcbride, 15:10:39) * Boron is required to support SFC (dmcbride, 15:10:55) * Sofia Wallin (sofiawallin, 15:12:27) * @frankbrockners says that FDS will be using ODL Boron for Colorado 1.0 (dmcbride, 15:13:48) * scenarios not using ODL for HA (dmcbride, 15:14:32) * ODL HA will be tested in Rel C2.0 and does not exist in C1.0 (rprakash_, 15:15:36) * @ChrisPriceAB wants to make sure that SDN controller application with regard to HA must be documented in release notes and scenario documentation (dmcbride, 15:15:53) * @DanSmithEricsson raises concern about scenario names using HA (dmcbride, 15:17:23) * should scenarios include "HA" if not all components are HA-capable (dmcbride, 15:18:11) * @bryan_att asserts that we should not change names, we should just document exceptions (dmcbride, 15:20:25) * documentation (dmcbride, 15:23:04) * @sofiawallin reports good progress with documentation (dmcbride, 15:24:06) * @sofiawallin has heard from all projects now except for Prediction (dmcbride, 15:27:46) * @frankbrockners raises issue about access to rendered documentation (dmcbride, 15:28:24) * @frankbrockners also wants to be able to setup own environment to render documentation instead of waiting for CI (dmcbride, 15:29:16) * discussed last week in the Infra meeting. Documentation is integrated with CI. Need better access to rendered artifacts (dmcbride, 15:30:19) * ACTION: @sofiawallin document how to access rendered documentation (dmcbride, 15:30:48) * ACTION: @sofiawallin document method for local rendering (dmcbride, 15:31:12) * LINK: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/configurationguide-single/index.html (bryan_att, 15:31:45) * LINK: http://artifacts.opnfv.org/opnfvdocs/colorado/configurationguide-single/index.html (dmcbride, 15:32:04) * LINK: https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/precise/retext/ (morgan_orange, 15:32:26) * Colorado 2.0 and 3.0 planning (dmcbride, 15:34:11) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Colorado+2.0+and+3.0 (dmcbride, 15:34:43) * Larry Lamers (ljlamers, 15:45:41) * Jira cleanup is not gating, so pull it from the schedule (dmcbride, 15:47:19) * D-release planning (dmcbride, 15:48:06) * @frankbrockners says that we should have a "window" for stable branch as we did with Colorado (dmcbride, 15:48:47) * also, remove Jira cleanup, as with Col 2.0 & 3.0 schedule (dmcbride, 15:49:18) Meeting ended at 16:07:54 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * sofiawallin * @sofiawallin document how to access rendered documentation * @sofiawallin document method for local rendering People present (lines said) --------------------------- * dmcbride (28) * ChrisPriceAB (15) * narindergupta (6) * rprakash_ (6) * bryan_att (6) * jmorgan1 (4) * morgan_orange (3) * collabot (3) * frankbrockners (2) * bin_ (2) * sofiawallin (2) * florind (1) * ljlamers (1) * StuartMackie (1) * kubi001 (1) * Greg_E_ (1) * dali` (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4