=============================
#opnfv-release: OPNFV release
=============================


Meeting started by dmcbride at 15:01:48 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2016/opnfv-release.2016-10-18-15.01.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (dmcbride, 15:01:57)
  * David McBride  (dmcbride, 15:02:03)
  * Justin(Compass4nfv)  (chigang, 15:02:26)
  * Sofia Wallin  (sofiawallin, 15:03:16)
  * Fedor Zhadaev  (fzhadaev, 15:03:28)
  * Bryan Sullivan  (bryan_att, 15:03:32)
  * Jack Morgan  (jmorgan1, 15:04:35)
  * Uli Kleber  (ulik, 15:05:34)
  * Stuart Mackie  (StuartMackie, 15:05:41)
  * Jose Lausuch  (jose_lausuch, 15:06:26)
  * Maryam Tahhan  (mtahhan, 15:10:06)
  * questions on expectations for Colorado 2.0 from test perspectives:
    (morgan_orange, 15:16:53)
  * do we expect documentaiton of delta / colorado 1.0  (morgan_orange,
    15:17:06)
  * do we need a snapshot of all the scenarios running in CI at 2.0 time
    (morgan_orange, 15:17:30)
  * waht about scenario which score is no more as high as for COlorado
    1.0  (morgan_orange, 15:17:48)
  * do we want to re-release scenarios with bug fixes?  (dmcbride,
    15:21:04)

* Colorado 2.0  (dmcbride, 15:21:24)
  * re-releasing scenarios implies overhead related to documentation,
    etc.  (dmcbride, 15:22:31)
  * os-nosdn-fdio is waiting on this fix
    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386280/  (trozet, 15:30:30)
  * LINK:
    https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-apex-apex-daily-colorado-daily-colorado/394/console
    (morgan_orange, 15:30:36)
  * apex/os-onos-sfc-ha now run in CI, 1 run seen so far smoke tests OK
    but copper and onos-sfc FAIL, details on
    https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-apex-apex-daily-colorado-daily-colorado/394/console
    (morgan_orange, 15:31:50)
  * in addition - *-fdio-* scenarios are waiting for
    https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3447/  (frankbrockners, 15:32:21)
  * ACTION: dmcbride send email to community indicating that Colorado
    2.0 is for scenarios that did not release under Colorado 1.0, i.e.
    this is not a bug fix or service release.  (dmcbride, 15:49:55)

* Danube  (dmcbride, 16:02:18)
  * dmcbride reviews updated intent-to-participate page that enables
    users to compare Colorado and Danube participation  (dmcbride,
    16:03:06)
  * dmcbride indicates that one more project  (Promise) stated their
    intent to participate in Danube.  No more projects expected.
    (dmcbride, 16:03:41)



Meeting ended at 16:03:48 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* dmcbride
  * dmcbride send email to community indicating that Colorado 2.0 is for
    scenarios that did not release under Colorado 1.0, i.e. this is not
    a bug fix or service release.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* morgan_orange (11)
* dmcbride (11)
* collabot` (3)
* mtahhan (2)
* chigang (2)
* frankbrockners (1)
* jose_lausuch (1)
* fzhadaev (1)
* bryan_att (1)
* trozet (1)
* sofiawallin (1)
* StuartMackie (1)
* ulik (1)
* jmorgan1 (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4