14:59:35 <dmcbride> #startmeeting Colorado 2.0 release daily
14:59:35 <collabot> Meeting started Mon Oct 24 14:59:35 2016 UTC.  The chair is dmcbride. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:59:35 <collabot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
14:59:35 <collabot> The meeting name has been set to 'colorado_2_0_release_daily'
14:59:41 <dmcbride> #topic roll call
14:59:47 <dmcbride> #info David McBride
14:59:52 <fzhadaev> #info Fedor Zhadaev
15:00:39 <bramwelt> #info Trevor Bramwell
15:02:31 <dmcbride> #topic scenarios
15:02:53 <dmcbride> Fedor - what's your decision about your updated scenarios?
15:03:06 <jose_lausuch> #info Jose Lausuch
15:03:07 <fzhadaev> Hi David
15:03:09 <fzhadaev> unfortunately our jobs are still unstable so we decided to skip 2.0 for all our scenarios.
15:03:20 <dmcbride> ok
15:03:22 <fzhadaev> Is it correct that in that case we just need to update links and release name in documentation?
15:03:37 <dmcbride> so, you're moving them out to Col 3.0, or to Danube?
15:03:50 <fzhadaev> I hope - 3.0
15:03:55 <dmcbride> ok
15:04:10 <dmcbride> well, the good news is that Os-onos-nofeature-ha on Apex is looking very good
15:04:15 <jose_lausuch> fzhadaev: does that statement include sfc scenario in fuel?
15:04:37 <dmcbride> #topic functest status
15:05:04 <dmcbride> #info Os-onos-nofeature-ha trending in an improved direction.  Current score is 20/21.
15:05:38 <jose_lausuch> right
15:06:22 <jose_lausuch> however onos-sfc looks so so
15:06:51 <dmcbride> Os-odl_l2-sfc-ha on Fuel also looks so so
15:06:57 <jose_lausuch> as for odl sfc, the main scenario test case (sfc) that fails
15:07:17 <dmcbride> I believe thats the same for Os-odl_l2-sfc-ha
15:07:29 <jose_lausuch> everything sunny but the main test case..
15:08:17 <jose_lausuch> fzhadaev: can you agree with Brady about your statement?
15:08:34 <fzhadaev> jose_lausuch: I'm not owner of sfc scenario. So I can say only about nosdn and odl_2/3 nofeature scenarios
15:08:36 <jose_lausuch> sfc folks are wondering what to do with the scenario
15:09:00 <dmcbride> Wei Su indicates that he is not planning to release that scenario for 2.0
15:09:13 <jose_lausuch> fzhadaev: so, when you say "all my scenarios" you mean only those, ok
15:09:39 <jose_lausuch> then Brady and his team are free to decide what to do with sfc scenario
15:10:56 <fzhadaev> As I understood it's up to scenario owner to decide - release scenario or not.
15:11:00 <fzhadaev> Am I wrong?
15:11:09 <jose_lausuch> sure, makes sense
15:11:26 <dmcbride> yes, that's correct
15:12:02 <jose_lausuch> for bgpvpn scenarios, it's also postponed for C3.0
15:15:16 <dmcbride> we're down to just two scenarios
15:16:09 <dmcbride> I sent email to Brady to confirm that he wants to release Os-odl_l2-sfc-ha
15:16:14 <jose_lausuch> ok
15:17:28 <dmcbride> other problem is that I think we're lacking scenario documentation for both of these
15:17:48 <jose_lausuch> which 2?
15:20:23 <dmcbride> Os-onos-nofeature-ha
15:20:23 <dmcbride> Os-odl_l2-sfc-ha
15:20:47 <jose_lausuch> ok
15:21:05 <dmcbride> AFAIK - those are the only 2 planned for Col 2.0
15:21:20 <jose_lausuch> dmcbride: do I need to update functest release notes with the current score for all scenarios ?
15:21:34 <dmcbride> no
15:21:39 <dmcbride> just the new scenarios
15:21:59 <jose_lausuch> do you have the list there?
15:22:10 <dmcbride> I just gave it to you
15:22:19 <jose_lausuch> so you mean these 2
15:22:22 <dmcbride> yes
15:22:23 <jose_lausuch> ok sorry
15:22:26 <jose_lausuch> thanks
15:22:28 <dmcbride> np
15:22:29 <jose_lausuch> I'll do it
15:22:37 <dmcbride> great - thanks
15:24:38 <dmcbride> jose_lausuch: and fzhadaev - are you in Barcelona this week?
15:24:47 <fzhadaev> no
15:24:53 <jose_lausuch> yes, but I'll arrive tomorrow in the afternoon
15:25:47 <dmcbride> ok - unless anyone has any more questions, I think I'm going to end a few minutes early and head over to the booth crawl :)
15:26:06 <jose_lausuch> ok for me
15:26:15 <fzhadaev> ok
15:26:24 <dmcbride> #endmeeting