#opnfv-release: OPNFV Release

Meeting started by dmcbride at 16:02:53 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. roll call (dmcbride, 16:03:08)
    1. David McBride (dmcbride, 16:03:12)
    2. Jose Lausuch (jose_lausuch, 16:03:18)
    3. Sofia Wallin (sofiawallin, 16:03:25)
    4. Jack Morgan (jmorgan1, 16:03:51)
    5. Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel, 16:04:19)
    6. Uli (uli-k, 16:04:25)
    7. Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 16:04:38)
    8. Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 16:08:28)

  2. Daisy integration with functest (dmcbride, 16:08:49)
    1. jose_lausuch continues to provide information to the Daisy team (dmcbride, 16:09:08)
    2. progress is unclear (dmcbride, 16:09:15)

  3. Danube schedule (dmcbride, 16:09:51)
  4. Movie status (dmcbride, 16:12:01)
    1. Prakash reports that Movie team is making progress in adding test cases to the TC database (dmcbride, 16:15:17)
    2. Prakash says that there are no longer any access issues (dmcbride, 16:15:36)

  5. Danube schedule (dmcbride, 16:16:03)
    1. Intel labs still needing to be brought online are kvm4nfv, ovsnfv, vsperf, Barometer (jmorgan1, 16:17:59)
    2. Intel lab will be back online by Wednesday this week (jmorgan1, 16:18:28)
    3. bryan_att reports that the Barometer project has been delayed due to resource unavailability (dmcbride, 16:20:13)
    4. bryan_att also notes that the unavailability of scenarios for Danube has also been a problem (dmcbride, 16:21:30)
    5. - to clarify there are several underlying delay issues beyond the lab infra issues we experienced this time. I don't want to conflate these, but they are: (1) the timeline in which current upstream code is integrated in installers; (2) the complexity and resource requirements of OPNFV deploys (bryan_att, 16:26:02)
    6. trevor_intel also reports being delayed due to resource migration (dmcbride, 16:26:36)
    7. as a result this year I am shifting toward more independence from OPNFV scenarios as a basis for test/dev, with functest integration at the right time (when installers are ready) and using OPNFV CI/CD infra for all that testing, rather than my dev lab resources (bryan_att, 16:28:38)
    8. trevor_intel asks about documentation requirements (dmcbride, 16:28:44)
    9. sofiawallin reports that documentation setup will be similar to prior releases, even though we are switching to read-the-docs (dmcbride, 16:29:40)
    10. doc WG continues to define requirements (dmcbride, 16:29:55)
    11. this approach should enable more early/continual progress on current upstream release support and features - in essence this is like OPNFV on Devstack, and no/few tests will be OPNFV-specific (all will run on upstream dev environments alone) (bryan_att, 16:31:07)
    12. sofiawallin reports that the doc WG is having an additional meeting on Weds (tomorrow) (dmcbride, 16:32:50)

  6. AoB (dmcbride, 16:33:03)
    1. jose_lausuch expresses concern about status of Joid (dmcbride, 16:33:27)
    2. narinder reports that Joid has been impacted by the Intel lab migration (dmcbride, 16:33:53)
    3. Intel POD5 Node5 needs to be reset due to IMPI being stuck (jmorgan1, 16:34:50)
    4. ACTION: narinder to update team on status of Joid at the next release meeting (Jan 24) (dmcbride, 16:37:34)


Meeting ended at 16:37:45 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. narinder to update team on status of Joid at the next release meeting (Jan 24)


People present (lines said)

  1. dmcbride (23)
  2. fdegir (11)
  3. bryan_att (8)
  4. jmorgan1 (4)
  5. collabot (3)
  6. jose_lausuch (3)
  7. trozet (2)
  8. trevor_intel (1)
  9. tallgren (1)
  10. sofiawallin (1)
  11. uli-k (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.