=============================
#opnfv-release: OPNFV release
=============================


Meeting started by dmcbride at 15:00:02 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2017/opnfv-release.2017-04-18-15.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (dmcbride, 15:00:13)
  * David McBride  (dmcbride, 15:00:19)
  * Jose Lausuch  (jose_lausuch, 15:03:11)
  * Tim Rozet  (trozet, 15:03:32)
  * Ray Paik  (rpaik, 15:04:23)
  * Sofia Wallin  (sofiawallin, 15:04:51)
  * Jack Morgan  (jmorgan1, 15:07:18)
  * Tapio  (tallgren, 15:09:15)

* MS6  (dmcbride, 15:09:16)
  * asking for lists of commits not always pragmatic  (dmcbride,
    15:11:09)
  * sofiawallin thinks that having the preliminary documentation
    requirement was useful  (dmcbride, 15:11:49)
  * MS6 = test case implementation, Prelimary Documentation  (jmorgan1,
    15:12:10)
  * jose_lausuch suggests that projects should provide a link to a CI
    run  (dmcbride, 15:18:49)
  * LINK:
    http://testresults.opnfv.org/reporting/functest/release/master/index-status-compass.html
    (jose_lausuch, 15:19:33)
  * frankbrockners says that test cases may not be run because the
    associated scenario is disabled while the team works on other issues
    (dmcbride, 15:23:00)
  * ACTION: bryan_att send email to dmcbride describing the function of
    a tool to help verify test case implementation  (dmcbride, 15:28:34)

* MS7/8  (dmcbride, 15:35:35)
  * jmorgan1 says that getting CI setup on the branch is more of a
    process issue than a schedule issue  (dmcbride, 15:44:31)
  * Should we allow scenarios to be released with only 1 or 2 runs of
    testing?  (dmcbride, 15:48:56)
  * frankbrockners says that we should continue to rely on the scenario
    owners judgment and not set a minimum number of runs  (dmcbride,
    15:50:13)
  * jose_lausuch agrees with Frank  (dmcbride, 15:51:30)

* MS9  (dmcbride, 15:54:30)
  * JIRA hygiene still a challenge.  Makes it difficult to rely on JIRA
    for program management.  (dmcbride, 15:54:59)
  * rpaik says that we should be using common issue status (open,
    resolved, closed, etc.) throughout OPNFV  (dmcbride, 15:55:42)

* retrospective  (dmcbride, 15:57:33)
  * we will continue (and hopefully finish) the Danube retrospective at
    hackfest next week.  (dmcbride, 15:57:59)



Meeting ended at 15:58:05 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* dmcbride
  * bryan_att send email to dmcbride describing the function of a tool
    to help verify test case implementation



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* dmcbride (21)
* collabot (4)
* jose_lausuch (2)
* jmorgan1 (2)
* tallgren (1)
* sofiawallin (1)
* trozet (1)
* rpaik (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4