15:00:55 #startmeeting OPNFV Release 15:00:55 Meeting started Tue May 16 15:00:55 2017 UTC. The chair is dmcbride. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 15:00:55 The meeting name has been set to 'opnfv_release' 15:01:13 #topic roll call 15:01:18 #info David McBride 15:03:22 GTM for release meeting: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/285662629 15:04:33 #info Uli 15:04:56 Hi folks what is the new webex ID 15:05:02 https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/285662629 15:05:39 is this a permanent change? 15:05:44 yes 15:06:00 #info Sofia Wallin 15:06:23 #info Tim Rozet 15:06:33 #info Greg E 15:06:45 #info Frank Brockners 15:08:41 #info Bryan Sullivan 15:09:15 * bryan_att thinks all tech conspires against us... 15:12:28 #topic Mllestone 10 15:13:44 #info preliminary documentation requirement at MS6 was only partially successful 15:14:05 #info sofiawallin_ says that we still need clarification around roles and requirements 15:20:16 #action sofiawallin_ to add topics to docs meeting for doc requirements and release roles 15:21:43 #info Maryam pointed out that it doesn't make sense to have JIRA ms before docs ms, since JIRA are often associated with JIRA 15:24:17 #topic baremetal vs virtual deployment 15:25:45 #info frankbrockners says that we've had a requirement since Arno to deploy to baremetal 15:26:23 There is a growing number of scenarios 15:26:33 #info bryan_att says that baremetal should be the goal 15:26:34 we are going to run out of CI slots at some point 15:27:03 so just practically we have to accept virtual testing for some scenearios 15:27:11 which are reasonably far removed from metal 15:27:49 Today this is not an issue 15:28:07 but scenario number is slowing increasing 15:28:15 so in the future this will be an issue 15:28:17 #info Greg_E_ points out that there is a resource issue. Do we have sufficient resources to deploy to baremetal? 15:28:52 #info trozet agrees that there is a resource issue. Adding an additional pod for Euphrates. 15:31:50 #info consensus that HA scenarios must deploy to baremetal to qualify for release 15:34:27 dmcbride, Ping: Just a note that there are multiple meeting IDs on the page https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Release+Planning 15:34:51 #topic release noha, based on successful release of ha? 15:35:16 GTM for release meeting: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/285662629' 15:36:31 #info noha scenarios should be tested in virtual, as a minimum requirement 15:39:57 #info bryan_att says that we should not set a requirement around the number of nodes required for baremetal deployment 15:42:42 #info In particular let's be careful about setting expectations that limit where we can take NFV platforms in the future, e.g. highly optimized edge deployments that may take 1-2 nodes or even exist as a virtual deploy in a single node, or on low-power servers with a single NIC, in some edge whitebox server resource. But let's discuss the usecases/options in 15:42:42 the Pharos meeting as suggested. 15:43:20 dmcbride, Picking on all the nice accents today :-) 15:43:48 #topic minimum test requirements? 15:44:42 #info dneary says that we should continue to have a low bar for testing 15:45:51 #info jose_lausuch would like to have some requirements but agrees with having scenario owners make the judgment about release 15:47:59 #topic experimental scenarios 15:48:51 #info jose_lausuch says that we should support experimental scenarios, as long as they are documented as such in the release notes 15:49:34 #info bryan_att says that experimentation is important 15:50:39 #info jmorgan1 asks about entry criteria for experimental scenarios 15:51:27 #info should we limit experimental scenarios to 1 or 2 releases? i.e., cannot go on forever as experimental. 15:56:00 #topic release/license scanning 15:56:21 #info informational only for Euphrates, but gating for 'F' release 16:00:46 #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=10294496 16:01:00 #info CI Gate securoty link above 16:02:52 Do we have the slides of the retrospective somewhere to look at? 20:30:46 dmcbride: are you going to end the meeting? 20:56:55 #endmeeting