=============================
#opnfv-release: OPNFV release
=============================


Meeting started by dmcbride at 15:01:23 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-release/2018/opnfv-release.2018-01-16-15.01.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* roll call  (dmcbride, 15:01:31)
  * David McBride  (dmcbride, 15:01:37)
  * Cristina Pauna  (CristinaPauna, 15:02:27)
  * Tim Rozet  (trozet, 15:02:28)
  * Bryan Sullivan  (bryan_att, 15:02:38)
  * Linda Wang  (LindaWang, 15:03:47)

* schedule review  (dmcbride, 15:07:52)
  * MS4 last Friday  (dmcbride, 15:07:59)
  * full compliance except for Yardstick  (dmcbride, 15:08:12)
  * will be following up with Ross this week  (dmcbride, 15:08:20)
  * MS3.1 is TODAY  (dmcbride, 15:09:17)
  * trozet says that Apex is in compliance  (dmcbride, 15:09:30)
  * LINK:
    https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/functest-apex-baremetal-daily-master/677/console
    (trozet, 15:10:11)
  * CristinaPauna says that both flavors of Fuel are compliant
    (dmcbride, 15:14:46)
  * ACTION: dmcbride to discuss RPM/ISOs vs. internet downloads (e.g.
    git clone) with Tim Irnich and Ray.  Should this be discussed at the
    TSC?  (dmcbride, 15:21:01)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Fraser#Fraser-OpenStackVersion
    (dmcbride, 15:28:24)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Fraser  (dmcbride,
    15:29:14)
  * MS3.2 - Feb 02  (dmcbride, 15:30:44)
  * requirements - deploy sdn-nofeature scenario and pass health check
    (dmcbride, 15:31:33)
  * MS5 - scenario integration - March 02  (dmcbride, 15:34:22)

* distribution requirements  (dmcbride, 15:52:22)
  * ACTION: timirnich to raise question with infra WG of how can we
    simplify offline distribution of OPNFV artifacts?  (dmcbride,
    15:53:47)
  * ACTION: timirnich and dmcbride to talk with rpaik about getting
    clarification from TSC about OPNFV distribution requirements?  Is
    offline support required?  What artifacts are acceptable?  What
    about "git clone" approach used by JOID and Fuel?  (dmcbride,
    15:55:18)
  * timirnich says that it's ok to download a limited number of files to
    a location, then run installer that can access files in that
    location.  This would be as opposed to pulling files directly off
    the internet by the installer, i.e. local repo.  (dmcbride,
    15:58:05)



Meeting ended at 15:59:08 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* dmcbride
  * dmcbride to discuss RPM/ISOs vs. internet downloads (e.g. git clone)
    with Tim Irnich and Ray.  Should this be discussed at the TSC?
  * timirnich and dmcbride to talk with rpaik about getting
    clarification from TSC about OPNFV distribution requirements?  Is
    offline support required?  What artifacts are acceptable?  What
    about "git clone" approach used by JOID and Fuel?



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* dmcbride (21)
* collabot (3)
* trozet (2)
* LindaWang (1)
* bryan_att (1)
* CristinaPauna (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4