#opnfv-sec: Security Group
Meeting started by LukeHinds at 14:00:26 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/opnfv-sec-meetings
(LukeHinds,
14:01:54)
- Luke is a prize idiot, reinstalled OS and has
forgotten the username for gotomeeting as it was in browser cache.
We will need to instead do this over IRC, sorry * (LukeHinds,
14:02:44)
- agree agena (LukeHinds, 14:03:03)
- anyone want to add to the agenda at all?
(LukeHinds,
14:03:53)
- Inspector will hopefully get a review for that
tomorrow from the TSC (LukeHinds,
14:05:24)
- AGREED: agenda
(LukeHinds,
14:05:58)
- last minutes? (not much there) (LukeHinds, 14:06:14)
- AGREED: last
minutes (LukeHinds,
14:06:46)
- work item updates (LukeHinds, 14:07:19)
- Jira has been updated so that we can raise
security bugs, which are not public (only a member of the osvm /
security group and the proj lead / lead commiter) can see. We just
need to test this a bit more. I have not been pushing the guys at
the linux foundation much though as they are super busy with first
release stuff at the same time. But progress (LukeHinds,
14:09:05)
- Need some members of the group who can read
code to join to help handle ulnerbailites as and when they
happen (LukeHinds,
14:09:34)
- I don't forsee it being very busy / much of a
time sink (LukeHinds,
14:09:47)
- I also am working still on putting up the page
to map to ETSI requirements. (LukeHinds,
14:10:12)
- we can do this with Inspector which might be
nice. So for every ETSI requirement that is present in inspector we
can show the relation, if that makes sense? (LukeHinds,
14:10:51)
- good, so I will get onto that next week I hope.
been a bit busy this week with other stuff on my desk. (LukeHinds,
14:11:54)
- marcel (LukeHinds,
14:12:49)
- Currently looking at the Integration projects,
trying to identify policy-relevant issues. I'm compiling a document
for the issues I find. Then we can discuss what to put on the
Int.Sec.Policy (mwinandy,
14:14:50)
- also found another nice example: Apache WSS4J
Security Best Practices. Lists tools-related security
guidelines (mwinandy,
14:15:36)
- Marcel, we need to work on the upstream
vulnerbitlies and how deployment teams handle those (generate
patches) (LukeHinds,
14:15:59)
- for example, openstack let us know 3-4 days in
advance of a pending sec patch, which we will need to work with
oscar (deployment projects) to have ready (LukeHinds,
14:16:56)
- inspector discussions (LukeHinds, 14:19:16)
- inspector will use sec group for incubation,
until it needs its own time for a dedicated meeting / channel. that
way it get the eyes of new members to the group and encourages them
to get involved. Plus feedback is available each week (if its
needed) (LukeHinds,
14:20:27)
- https://github.com/openstack/pycadf/tree/master/etc/pycadf
(LukeHinds,
14:25:39)
- inspector will extend openstack taxonomies
(above link as examples) (LukeHinds,
14:26:16)
- inspector is needs a means to audit the
taxonomies, and favourite is tempest, but still being
evaluated. (LukeHinds,
14:28:21)
- ACTION: , try to get
more ODL into the group (LukeHinds,
14:32:35)
- mwinandy suggested including ONOS colleagues to
work on ONOS inspector based taxonomies, jaosorior agreed it would
be good, as long as people working on it (LukeHinds,
14:42:20)
- any other biz? (LukeHinds, 14:46:30)
- reminder, sign up for the mailing list if you
have not already. that way you will see gerrit review tagged
alerts. (LukeHinds,
14:49:38)
Meeting ended at 14:52:22 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- , try to get more ODL into the group
People present (lines said)
- LukeHinds (67)
- jaosorior (42)
- mwinandy (15)
- collabot (3)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.