#opnfv-testperf: testing work group

Meeting summary

1. roll call (mj_rex, 15:07:46)
   1. Rex Lee (mj_rex, 15:07:51)
   2. Cédric Ollivier (ollivier, 15:07:54)
   
   
2. xtesting discuss (mj_rex, 15:08:11)
   1. David McBride (dmcbride, 15:10:11)
   2. what testing projects need to do to utilizing the xtesing ci/cd tool chain (mj_rex, 15:11:05)
   3. https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=32015004 (ollivier, 15:13:06)
   4. cedric suggest to build your own ci/cd tool chain (mj_rex, 15:13:20)
   5. cedric suggest to build your own ci/cd tool chain from scratch refer to: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=32015004 (mj_rex, 15:17:13)
   6. david ask if xtesing ci/cd is related to testing tool packaging (mj_rex, 15:22:18)
   7. https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-latest-gate/97/ (ollivier, 15:26:24)
   8. what xci is verifying may late than the openstack master (mj_rex, 15:32:15)
   9. cedric mentioned the testing tool should be independant with the SUT (mj_rex, 15:35:38)
   10. two modes of ci: gating and daily (mj_rex, 15:51:44)
   11. they are different (mj_rex, 15:51:57)
   12. https://build.opnfv.org/ci/job/xci-deploy-baremetal-ubuntu-daily-master/200/consoleFull (mj_rex, 15:52:43)
   13. as an example if xci on baremetal (mj_rex, 15:52:59)
   14. Cédric: All test tool workflow should be independent of the installer development. (ollivier, 16:00:26)
   15. Cédric: Else we can't develop the test tools and get results as soon as the installer can't be deployed or is not good enough. (ollivier, 16:01:16)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. mj_rex (15)
2. ollivier (6)
3. collabot (3)
4. dmcbride (1)