============================================== #opnfv-vswitchperf: vswitchperf weekly meeting ============================================== Meeting started by SridharRao at 14:59:27 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-vswitchperf/2017/opnfv-vswitchperf.2017-11-01-14.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Agenda (SridharRao, 14:59:52) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel_, 15:02:24) * Al Morton (acm, 15:02:53) * Sridhar has defined 3 options for proportions (trevor_intel_, 15:05:03) * Team to choose which option VSPERF should go ahead. (SridharRao, 15:06:44) * In Table of proportions apart from size and proportion, additional keys should be supported (SridharRao, 15:09:47) * Option B is used by Yardstick (trevor_intel_, 15:20:29) * Disadvantage of Option B is its more verbose (trevor_intel_, 15:20:55) * Option A and B implementation are equivalent (trevor_intel_, 15:21:16) * Preliminary agreement for Option B (trevor_intel_, 15:21:34) * Status of CI Jobs (SridharRao, 15:21:44) * Intel Pod-12 is still down (SridharRao, 15:21:54) * issue: physical servers have been moved, need to investigate ports connections wiring (acm, 15:23:12) * CI forcing execution on alternate Ericsson machine, build 4 machin not utilized as much (acm, 15:24:28) * workload at Ericsson CI could be one possible reason (SridharRao, 15:25:27) * Martin K wet with Maciek from VPP CSIT (Fd.io) (acm, 15:26:38) * confirm how VSPERF has configured cross-connect between VPP ports (acm, 15:27:19) * Macirk says OK (acm, 15:27:39) * Martin to prepare P2P config changes to compare numbers with CSIT tests (trevor_intel_, 15:28:16) * ACM shares information about NFVBench (SridharRao, 15:28:46) * cross-check results with Maciek (acm, 15:29:23) * ACM sees potential in comparision of results from NFVBench and VSPERF (SridharRao, 15:30:43) * Maciek explains that any test with "l2c" is compatable with VSPERF tests (acm, 15:32:08) * scenario they use is 2 server architecture, (acm, 15:32:51) * reason is that traffic gen could not conduct all the encap decap operations at capacity (acm, 15:33:33) * FDIO CSIT matched two VPP implementations to relieve the Traffic Gen from encap decap (acm, 15:34:30) * CSIT uses Trex on UCS (acm, 15:38:08) * CSIT supports PVP or PVVP, but not more Vs (acm, 15:38:43) * VSPERF supports VM chaining with many VMs (acm, 15:39:09) * CSIT limitation can only use 2 VMs (trevor_intel_, 15:39:12) * Martin K will create a JIRA ticket regarding CSIT collaboration future activities (SridharRao, 15:41:43) * Maciek would be interested in comments on new user read-ability of graphs (acm, 15:43:07) * ACTION: acm contact Maciek with feedback (acm, 15:43:28) * trevor mentioned that CSIT results were about half VSPERFs, CSIT uses 1 PMD thread (1:1 with cores) and maps to about same for VSPERF (acm, 15:45:17) * CSIT uses 1, 2 and 4 PMD threads (1 PMD thread = 1 CPU core) (trevor_intel_, 15:45:18) * Martin K explains the challenge in creating 'comparable' environment (CPU, mem) for running tests to compare CSIT results (SridharRao, 15:45:49) * ACTION: Martin to create JIRA ticket (SridharRao, 15:48:19) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Summary+of+Release+Plans+for+Fraser (trevor_intel_, 15:49:17) * LINK: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vsperf-release-fraser (SridharRao, 15:49:40) * LINK: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/vsperf-release-fraser (SridharRao, 15:49:59) * Release Plan (SridharRao, 15:58:29) * ACTION: To update the Etherpad with Inputs. (SridharRao, 15:58:57) Meeting ended at 16:00:48 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * acm * acm contact Maciek with feedback * **UNASSIGNED** * Martin to create JIRA ticket * To update the Etherpad with Inputs. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * SridharRao (19) * acm (18) * trevor_intel_ (12) * collabot (3) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4