14:00:02 #startmeeting Yardstick Work Meeting 14:00:02 Meeting started Mon Sep 7 14:00:02 2015 UTC. The chair is anac1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'yardstick_work_meeting' 14:00:10 #info Ana Cunha 14:00:17 hi, please info your name 14:00:50 #info Akis Kourtis 14:01:18 #info Kristian Hunt 14:02:03 #topic vTC code in Yardstick repo 14:02:37 Akis_: do you get the permission you need to push code? 14:03:08 yes we managed to solve this problem, and now I have full access on both Jira and gerrit 14:03:22 great! 14:03:37 what is the plan ? 14:04:33 you need to push in smaller batches and get it reviewed (gerrit review) 14:04:38 the plan is to upload first the .rst file with the description and general guidelines for the vtc 14:05:14 yes also because we usually build a few libraries, should we upload all of those? 14:05:29 or just make a script to do this automatically? 14:05:33 ok, check documentation structure here: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/yardstick_folders 14:06:00 where will the script fetch from? 14:06:28 from a bitbucket repository 14:06:46 or we can include the libraries 14:07:16 we need to investigate 14:07:48 #action anac and Akis__ to check the dependencies to bitbucket and how to solve the libraries 14:07:48 yes we are currently discussing this with Intel, and try to find the best way 14:08:13 ok, we fix this, i will open a jira task and assign to you, ok? 14:08:39 ok perfect 14:08:44 #action anac to create a task and assign to Akis__ 14:09:36 release-B will be openstacl liberty, what is your plan for vtc? 14:09:59 openstack 14:10:29 we currently support kilo, but I see no major issues to support liberty also 14:11:05 ok, can you uplift to liberty ? 14:11:31 yes we always update and test to the latest 14:11:43 #info vTC currently on openstack kilo, plan to uplift to liberty 14:11:46 good 14:12:38 you need a committer to merge your code 14:13:08 i'll keep track and encourage yardstick commiters to review 14:13:30 ok thank you 14:13:52 to test the vtc, how much hadware is required ? 14:14:18 hardware 14:14:35 physical hardware none, just a simple NIC 14:14:49 the VM should have at least 2 vNICs 14:15:32 #info to test vTC, the VM should have minimum 2 vNICs 14:15:34 then it depends if you want to test also SR-IOV, but it works in the most simple test case scenario 14:15:58 ok, takink SR-IOV in the picture 14:16:50 then one dual-port SR-IOV enabled NIC, incoming and outgoing traffic 14:17:02 Do we want to add to the list a packet generator or this is implicit? 14:17:18 #info with SR-IOV, one dual-port SR-IOV enabled NIC 14:17:31 what is the requirment on packet generator? 14:17:40 I believe it should be omitted for now, as one can choose his traffic generation 14:17:48 ok 14:18:13 it makes sense 14:19:17 what about the framework, shall we add an interface from yardstick to it? 14:19:53 the idea for that would be to have API exposed from the framework to yardstick 14:20:20 ok, anyone object? 14:20:52 #agreed design an API from vTC framework to Yardstick 14:21:12 any idea how to move on the API? or have you started? 14:21:20 not started yet 14:21:39 #action anac to add a task for the API design (from vTC to Yardstick) 14:21:49 can i assign you, vincenzo ? 14:22:02 I think the API should depend on the test cases we want to implement within the framework 14:22:06 sure 14:23:26 we have 2 test cases to start with, but let's specify a few more so we don't have to refactor the api too often 14:23:46 does that make sense? 14:24:10 if the two test cases proposed by Michael are fine we could start from them, and can follow the approach you suggest 14:24:35 how much work is to modify the api later ? 14:24:53 do we want to arrange a brief meeting at the end in 3/4 days to talk about the test cases? 14:25:18 exactly what i was thinking 14:25:26 when is michael available? 14:25:53 friday this week work? 14:25:57 I think Thursday and Friday, I dont' know his dayly agenda bdw 14:26:04 daily 14:26:18 yep, should work 14:26:42 let's say friday preliminary, we move if it doesn't work 14:27:01 ok 14:27:06 ok 14:27:09 #info separate meeting to discuss test cases end of this week 14:27:40 we like your visualization with grafana, plan to do the same for the rest of yardstick 14:28:04 for the real time data 14:29:07 very good, grafana is very nice, available to help 14:29:56 will put info and questions in yardstick-130 14:31:34 have you a folder structure suggestion for the code? 14:31:48 for the framework? 14:32:24 yes, framework and also vtc, if understand you plan to contribute both? 14:33:02 we don't have a structure yet 14:33:19 add your suggestion to https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/yardstick_folders, when you are ready 14:33:21 do we want to have a brief talk about it during the planned call? 14:33:31 ok, we can do that 14:33:34 ok 14:34:32 great demo last thursday, thanks a lot 14:34:54 we have recorded it, on its way to be uploaded to opnfv youtube channel 14:34:55 thank you Ana! 14:35:30 than you for your support 14:36:02 thank you for the amazing work ! michael mentioned you plan to make another demo, any idea on when ? one month time? 14:36:22 I think is going to be in one month time, yes 14:36:39 the idea was to show some features of the framework 14:37:13 coupled with the vTC 14:37:18 ok, i will book a preliminary slot october 1st 14:37:32 ok 14:38:29 i guess we got some action points and looks like you know what to do 14:38:34 anything else? 14:39:05 it's fine on my side 14:39:14 me too 14:39:34 thanks for today, i'll book the call for friday 14:39:39 #endmeeting