======================================= #opnfv-yardstick: Yardstick workmeeting ======================================= Meeting started by anac1 at 07:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-yardstick/2015/opnfv-yardstick.2015-09-17-07.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Patrick (Patrick_, 07:00:37) * Ana Cunha (anac1, 07:00:44) * gao liang (kubi, 07:00:51) * Jingwen (Jingwen_, 07:00:56) * QiLiang (qiliang_, 07:00:56) * Discussion with Vaccine (anac1, 07:01:45) * fuqiao (fuqiao, 07:01:52) * LINK: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/187944245 (kubi, 07:02:29) * xiaoli presents a summary on the vaccine proposal (anac1, 07:03:16) * anac asks the team for opinion (anac1, 07:04:00) * anac asks if the framework proposed should be developed from the start (anac1, 07:04:57) * anac asks if vaccine team has checked all the existing frameworks in opnfv (anac1, 07:06:29) * anac asks if they are sure it is not possible to reuse (anac1, 07:07:45) * anac suggests to try and reuse the existing frameworks at first approach (anac1, 07:09:55) * anac asks for the proposal to be updated to reflect to reuse the existing frameworks at first approach (anac1, 07:16:48) * anac suggests to discuss with ha project for the test cases (anac1, 07:17:28) * a discussion with ha will happen next week (anac1, 07:18:59) * a discussion is on-going in the tsc about changing the life cycle of the projects (anac1, 07:21:13) * Having more/different test frameworks will complicate the integration work (fdegir, 07:34:05) * Increase the load on infra projects (releng, octopus) (fdegir, 07:34:17) * Will risk us supporting all these frameworks (fdegir, 07:34:41) * Rather than naming or talking about test activities based on what frameworks are used to run them (fdegir, 07:35:13) * I prefer to classify what they test (fdegir, 07:35:21) * And put effort on an already existing framework to make sure the additional test scopes can be covered by them (fdegir, 07:35:50) * yardstick and ha cooperation will continue (anac1, 07:41:33) * output manger and dispatcher (anac1, 07:42:03) * jorgn asks what is needed from dispatcher from output manager (anac1, 07:42:26) * can you continue the work output manager? (anac1, 07:42:51) * output manager downprioritized (anac1, 07:43:40) * the work for the dispacher can continue (anac1, 07:44:25) * jnon proposes to postpone outputmanager (anac1, 07:53:54) * AGREED: postpone outputmanager and to later if/when needed (anac1, 07:55:58) * framework architecture (anac1, 07:56:35) * continue with the discussion on your view on yardstick ha etherpad about architectural changes (anac1, 07:57:19) * qiliang committer promotion (anac1, 07:57:38) * got 5 "+1" votes, i'll send an e-mail to tsc (anac1, 07:57:58) Meeting ended at 07:58:51 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * anac1 (35) * fdegir (26) * jose_lausuch (17) * qiliang_ (16) * jnon_ (6) * kubi (5) * Patrick_ (4) * collabot (3) * fuqiao (2) * Per_H (2) * Jingwen_ (2) * morgan_orange (2) * rex_lee_ (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4