================= #lfn-meeting: tac ================= Meeting started by dfarrell07 at 14:00:10 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/lfn-meeting/2018/lfn-meeting.2018-10-10-14.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * TAC members please #info in (dfarrell07, 14:00:34) * Daniel Farrell (dfarrell07, 14:00:39) * edwarnicke (edwarnicke, 14:00:49) * Greg Elkinbard (GregElkinbard, 14:00:52) * Xiaojun Xie (Xiaojun, 14:01:32) * Tim Irnich (timirnich, 14:03:26) * Greg asks about the TF induction (CaseyLF, 14:07:09) * Casey said there must be at least a 2 week review. It has not been 2 weeks review. (CaseyLF, 14:08:09) * Daniel also noted that the automated checks for the gerrit patch are failing. (CaseyLF, 14:08:31) * Tapio Tallgren (ttallgren, 14:11:37) * Rossella Sblendido (rossella_s, 14:11:47) * ACTION: dfarrell07 to clarify in induction document that we expect automated checks to be passing (so can even build HTML) and clear, dedicated-subject email constitute announcing doc to start review (dfarrell07, 14:11:55) * Anders Rosengren (anders_, 14:16:41) * ACTION: edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests) (dfarrell07, 14:28:06) * discussion about how there are two budget processes going on - LF-driven, in-law process; info-gathering, still-not-accepted CBO process (dfarrell07, 14:28:47) * edwarnicke presents slides that explain COB (dfarrell07, 14:29:03) * GregElkinbard Makes the point that process *isn't* working now, needs to devolve decision making down to communities (edwarnicke, 14:40:54) * dfarrell07 expresses agreement wit GregElkinbard (edwarnicke, 14:41:04) * Tom Nadaeu expresses agreement with GregElkinbard (edwarnicke, 14:41:21) * dfarrell07 thinks the key point is that by letting market forces work at the bottom with the most informed people we will get the best resource allocation (dfarrell07, 14:42:02) * Note of clarification: GregElkinbard's point was the non-(Community Oriented Process) isn't working (edwarnicke, 14:42:08) * dfarrell07 thinks we need to re-write the summary of COB to be more clear, given that I think the TAC itself is just getting to a point we can clearly explain this (dfarrell07, 14:43:51) * TAC votes to request the board invite the TSC TAC reps to the Oct 17 board meeting to present their community oriented budget needs (edwarnicke, 14:47:12) * for reference, the fd.io deck is here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yrPIHZizkOfMe88JCLt-t_yovzmKgZF8kqqsmNn4wkQ/edit#slide=id.p (edwarnicke, 14:53:06) * edwarnicke is more than happy to grant edit rights to other TSC reps to this doc should they choose to build their slides there as well (edwarnicke, 14:55:14) * AGREED: TAC votes to request the board invite the TSC TAC reps to the Oct 17 board meeting to present their community oriented budget needs (edwarnicke, 14:57:59) * LINK: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yrPIHZizkOfMe88JCLt-t_yovzmKgZF8kqqsmNn4wkQ/edit#slide=id.p <- FD.io COB slides (edwarnicke, 15:02:53) Meeting ended at 15:18:35 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dfarrell07 * dfarrell07 to clarify in induction document that we expect automated checks to be passing (so can even build HTML) and clear, dedicated-subject email constitute announcing doc to start review * edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests) * edwarnicke * edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests) * timirnich * edwarnicke to clarify COB scope wording per timirnich and dfarrell07 feedback to not require co-location (ie OPNFV Plugfests) People present (lines said) --------------------------- * dfarrell07 (18) * edwarnicke (11) * collabot (6) * CaseyLF (4) * ttallgren (2) * anders_ (1) * timirnich (1) * GregElkinbard (1) * rossella_s (1) * Xiaojun (1) * kennypaul (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4