======================
#opnfv-infra: infra-wg
======================


Meeting started by bramwelt at 16:10:44 UTC.  The full logs are
available at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-infra/2019/opnfv-infra.2019-11-04-16.10.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Roll Call  (bramwelt, 16:10:50)
  * Trevor Bramwell  (bramwelt, 16:10:59)
  * Jack Morgan  (bramwelt, 16:11:03)
  * Aric Gardner  (aricg, 16:11:12)
  * Lincoln Lavoie  (bramwelt, 16:11:38)
  * Jim Baker  (bramwelt, 16:11:43)
  * Mark Shostak  (bramwelt, 16:11:58)
  * Mike Fix  (bramwelt, 16:12:05)

* Pharos Specification  (bramwelt, 16:12:29)
  * Discussed in the previous Tech Discuss call today  (bramwelt,
    16:12:47)
  * There are still open questions around hardware specification.
    (bramwelt, 16:16:22)
  * Lincoln explains the hardware may also drive changes to networking
    hardware - need to know the limitations  (bramwelt, 16:17:13)
  * Jim comments he doesn't think the change should be tied to release
    timeline.  (bramwelt, 16:19:39)
  * Jack explains the Pharos specification is versioned by the OPNFV
    releases, which is why they are coupled.  (bramwelt, 16:20:24)
  * Jack raises the point that labs haven't been fully utilizing the
    networking interfaces and questions if the 25Gb interfaces are a
    hard requirement.  (bramwelt, 16:21:34)
  * Lincoln notes the Pharos specification doesn't touch on external
    hardware and those may also be needed by CNTT  (bramwelt, 16:24:20)
  * Mark notes the hardware requirements are also driven by the testing
    requirements  (bramwelt, 16:27:17)
  * Lincoln asks if there are differences between storage for compute vs
    controller as knowing that would provide an upgrade path for the
    servers  (bramwelt, 16:29:31)
  * Lincoln explains that if we can agree on a common denominator for
    the hardware then it will be able to meet more project requirements
    (bramwelt, 16:35:16)
  * Discussion on how to drive the changes and if it makes sense to
    propose changes to the RI spec to align with the lab configuration
    (bramwelt, 16:38:04)
  * ACTION: Lincoln to follow up on tech-discuss list regarding proposed
    changes to CNTT-RI section 4  (bramwelt, 16:41:29)

* Other topics  (bramwelt, 16:56:19)
  * Follow up on Pharos -> LaaS git migration  (bramwelt, 16:56:36)
  * Discussion on moving the meeting to afternoon or having an
    additional one to support those in China  (bramwelt, 17:03:13)

* Overflow meeting on Laas git  (bramwelt, 17:03:27)
  * It's not clear if the containers being used in LaaS are built
    locally or pulled from dockerhub  (bramwelt, 17:04:35)
  * Parker suggests merging the change as they containers aren't pointed
    at the pharos dockerhub namespace  (bramwelt, 17:05:53)



Meeting ended at 17:07:07 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* bramwelt (28)
* collabot (3)
* aricg (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4