======================= #opnfv-mano: opnfv-mano ======================= Meeting started by pramchan at 14:05:08 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-mano/2017/opnfv-mano.2017-10-04-14.05.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111 (pramchan, 14:07:39) * Agenda Bashing (pramchan, 14:07:51) * mohankumar_ (mohankumar_, 14:09:45) * September Month end report and Actions from last week (pramchan, 14:11:58) * LINK: https://opnfv.slack.com/files/U0C6EU7C3/F7CTNDCAF/opnfv-mano-wg-report-Sept-2017 (pramchan, 14:12:15) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/dovetail/Project+Name%3A++++++Dovestack (pramchan, 14:13:54) * ACTION: To be discussed with test Group next week - Trinath and Prasad to lead the discussion. (pramchan, 14:14:47) * since there is a concern from test wg and many others that they do not want a seperate project for use case vIMS Clearwater-heat there is no need to spend our precious resource on that this cycle (pramchan, 14:18:10) * yes ARM64 node can be controller or compute or both. The new proposal "Mutiarch" can decide what's the options for x86_64 node vs. arm64 node and it it can be either (pramchan, 14:20:06) * but to call it mutiarch one must have mixed mode, I mean you can have controller as ARM64 node (3 nodes fro HA) and using both x86_64 and arm64 as compute nodes (pramchan, 14:21:35) * make sure to post proposal and community can help build the case, use the proposal foramt on link (pramchan, 14:22:41) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Proposals (pramchan, 14:23:31) * please ask trinath, Prasad and srikanth if they are planning along with you to post and send an email to TSC as soon as possible as it takes atleast 2 weeks and additional 2 weeks to get it approved for F-Release (pramchan, 14:25:15) * ACTION: fro last week - Mohan did you get the access to FUNCTEST you had asked fro? (pramchan, 14:26:52) * I see an email to hat effect and can close the action I item -Thanks (pramchan, 14:27:36) * if you are touch with trainath and NXP team make sure that either you present the Dovstack test requirements this Thursday or have a seperate 'Multiarch" project proposed and put Dovestack on hold untill there is community support for that (pramchan, 14:29:43) * I will not be able to join this Thursday test wg meeting (pramchan, 14:30:22) * Best practices that can be carried forward from E to F and upstream (pramchan, 14:31:14) * note E-Release we had vnf onboarding and agreement was to use CSAR with Manifest and that was adapted by Orchestra (pramchan, 14:32:44) * Opera did not partcipate in E (pramchan, 14:33:06) * correspondingly ONAP has adopated two and is in line with our bestpratcies (pramchan, 14:33:47) * https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=10781062 (pramchan, 14:34:16) * TOSCA version spec: TOSCA Simple Profile in YAML Version 1.1 TOSCA CSAR-Version: 1.1 With option 1 (a TOSCA-Metadata directory ): Manifest file: CSAR package support with and without manifest file (pramchan, 14:34:49) * thats a good sign and we have vnf packaging format taken care in both and need to verify if Auto is too adapting same (pramchan, 14:36:08) * on oboarding Orchestra has bothe generic and speific vnfm(using Juju) (pramchan, 14:37:04) * With opera it used HEAT with Open-O and in ONAP Amsterdam continues with HEAT so there is consistancy ther too (pramchan, 14:38:57) * more details we will know once we see Opera start integrating with Artifcat from Amsterdam through use cases through OPNFV VIM (pramchan, 14:39:54) * the use case process in OPNAP is listed on link (pramchan, 14:41:20) * LINK: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Use+Case+Definition (pramchan, 14:41:25) * VNF SDK use case diagram shows that and comparing with Orchestar the process is similar (pramchan, 14:42:53) * White paper for on State of MANO in OPNFV (pramchan, 14:43:23) * any inputs from anyone here and will send email to folow up on this, as who woulf like to contrbute (pramchan, 14:44:22) * we need topics to cover for this and some structure and a template I wil try create on mano wiki page for comamnts and contribution so that we can give inputs to F-Release from mano-wg (pramchan, 14:46:02) * we need inputs from Service providers as they are the end users and we will also seek inputs from EUAG on this (pramchan, 14:47:09) Meeting ended at 14:49:09 UTC. People present (lines said) --------------------------- * pramchan (45) * mohankumar_ (5) * collabot (4) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4