=====================================
#opnfv-meeting: OPNFV release diagram
=====================================


Meeting started by rpaik at 13:05:40 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2015/opnfv-meeting.2015-03-27-13.05.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* purpose: architectural diagram + roadmap + Arno components?  (rpaik,
  13:10:08)
* weathermap for requirements project (vs. roadmap)?  (rpaik, 13:11:51)
* press/analyst want higher-level information and they’re also
  interested in what’s comiing down the road  (rpaik, 13:15:43)
* also questions on test & integration  (rpaik, 13:16:20)
* Ray Nugent’s slide: a lot of info. on one slide.  Trying to capture
  cadence/theme  (rpaik, 13:18:55)
* Chris argues timeline is useful and could also be added at the bottom
  of a "weathermap"  (Gerald_K, 13:19:52)
* hard to predict which themes are emerging  (rpaik, 13:22:15)
* Chris’ slide: identify what infrastructure/HW is available  (rpaik,
  13:23:59)
* platform part a recognition of upstream projects OPNFV is working with
  (rpaik, 13:25:32)
* ...and acknowlegde the OPFNV projects  (Gerald_K, 13:26:01)
* legal question: can we use the upstream logos?  (Gerald_K, 13:26:26)
* need to figure out logo usage  (rpaik, 13:27:18)
* logos can also confuse the message. you want to promote your own
  project, not the others  (Gerald_K, 13:27:38)
* size of boxes/positioning are not indicative of anything  (rpaik,
  13:29:11)
* LINK:
  https://www.opnfv.org/developers/technical-project-governance/project-lifecycle
  (rpaik, 13:30:26)
* you may need to send logos to other upstream communities for approval
  (rpaik, 13:32:17)
* remove vRouter/vIMS  (rpaik, 13:35:33)
* slide4 shows the "machinery", the process we are developing
  (Gerald_K, 13:37:31)
* OSCAR slide: good to have a process slide on our wiki (doesn’t need to
  be in the release diagram)  (rpaik, 13:37:44)
* target would be tech. audience  (rpaik, 13:38:30)
* Morgan’s slide: also includes definition of project types  (rpaik,
  13:41:14)
* timeline would be difficult + no reference to upstream projs  (rpaik,
  13:42:00)
* using the same format for multiple target audience  (rpaik, 13:47:45)
* need to be careful with the use of code name  (rpaik, 13:48:48)
* every project should come up with project descriptions  (rpaik,
  13:51:34)
* Bryan’s: rather than OpenStack/ODL use a more generic term?  (rpaik,
  13:56:48)
* Ray/Heather to get a strawman  (rpaik, 14:01:34)



Meeting ended at 14:02:21 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* rpaik (28)
* Gerald_K (9)
* collabot (4)
* dneary (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4