14:01:25 #startmeeting Octopus weekly meeting 14:01:25 Meeting started Mon May 4 14:01:25 2015 UTC. The chair is ulik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:25 The meeting name has been set to 'octopus_weekly_meeting' 14:01:53 Hi, please type #info with your name, so we have participant list. 14:01:58 #info Jun Li 14:02:00 #info Uli 14:02:12 #info Jose Lausuch 14:02:18 #info meimei 14:02:21 info zhifeng 14:02:27 #info zhifeng 14:02:57 #info Dan Radez 14:04:05 Welcome everybody. A few important people I don't see on the channel yet, so maybe we have to start without them. 14:04:16 #info ulik apologizes that the agenda and previous minutes were distributed late 14:04:38 .. but they are on wiki (meetings/octopus) now. 14:05:04 #topic Agenda bashing 14:05:15 #info Agenda has: Rollcall,Agenda bashing,Action item review,Arno Release follow-up,Status lab connections,Documentation Status,Release 2 Brainstorming 14:05:29 Any additions? 14:06:04 #info Fatih Degirmenci 14:06:13 * ulik welcome 14:06:22 * fdegir thanks 14:06:32 #info rprakash 14:06:45 No additions to agenda, so let's start with 14:06:55 #topic Action item review 14:07:26 #info Action from last week: all to review 399 and 400 14:07:41 I saw documents merged. 14:07:58 So I assume there were reviews :) 14:08:00 yes 14:08:06 got one extra review 14:08:22 incoporated the changes 14:08:35 and merged them on Wednesday if I'm not mistaken 14:08:57 I expect we get more comments later, when other projects actually start using the documents 14:09:13 hopefully 14:09:30 #info Action from last week: MatthewL2 new infra document according to OCTO-63 14:09:35 https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/453/ 14:09:41 you can review now 14:09:55 I complete it today 14:09:57 #info Infra document has been sent for review 14:09:59 #link https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/453/ 14:10:10 Great! 14:10:26 #info Action from last week: uli remove outdated links etc. in main page. 14:10:51 I did it. I hope I didn't remove a link too much ;-) 14:11:05 Next one is related: 14:11:21 #info Action from last week: uli to add also links to pdf documents. 14:11:27 Also done. 14:11:41 good 14:11:41 an additional question 14:12:08 #info question: should we include a heading on these auto-generated documents to highlight they're generated automatically? 14:12:08 shoot 14:12:25 good idea 14:12:26 so people don't update wiki by mistake and their updates are overwritten later on 14:12:47 They will immediately see that it is autogenerated. 14:12:54 will they? 14:12:56 Just try to edit one. 14:12:56 how? 14:13:22 try to edit and you will see that there is just scrape ..... instruction 14:13:30 now I see 14:13:51 then it's not necessary perhaps - assumin everyone understands scrape means the page is coming from some other place 14:14:08 But a hint would be good that people are encouraged to send us comments so we can improve the docs. 14:14:34 yep, we can put a sentence just before "Documentation Tracking" on our pages 14:14:39 and highlight this fact 14:14:42 ... at least they won't find the content they want to change hehehe 14:14:58 I'll action myself 14:15:04 ok 14:15:11 perhaps we can talk to vlaza regarding this 14:15:23 so it can be generalized for all the projects putting documents to wiki in this way 14:15:42 so you propose to action vlaza? 14:15:56 you and vlaza :D 14:16:08 ok 14:16:15 if all docs from git, it will not be a wiki? yes? 14:16:45 not all docs are from git 14:17:01 like general octopus page, meetings, etc 14:17:12 and perhaps some other docs that are not referenced by the community 14:17:14 case-by-case 14:17:21 #action ulik and vlaza: add a note how to comment on documents under "document tracking" 14:17:48 I even put the main summary, scope and introduction of the main page into git. 14:18:13 good, we have even more in scm 14:18:25 and if I remember correctly, also the key project facts are scaped.... 14:18:32 scraped.... 14:18:40 question regarding doc 14:18:45 in the functest doc http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/functest.html 14:19:01 I haev a section : if you want to automate your tests 14:19:05 shall I keep it here 14:19:13 or give a pointer to one of your doc? 14:19:46 better point to CI doc. (just in case we update to something fancy) 14:20:16 OK I will just keep the section title and redirect to your doc (to avoid divergence) 14:20:26 +1 14:21:17 I think that was actions from last week. 14:21:44 I checked the last few meetings about actions and found some on April 13: 14:22:18 #info Action from April 13: We need clear instructions for how to work with documentation and what to do with produced documents/artifacts 14:22:30 morgan_orange:for connection of your platform 14:22:39 please put reference to https://wiki.opnfv.org/octopus/jenkins_slave_connection 14:22:49 and remove the rest 14:22:55 ok 14:23:06 and replace CI Scripts with "Integrating into CI Pipeline" 14:23:30 you can say "Contact Octopus Team" and put a link to https://wiki.opnfv.org/octopus/pipelines 14:23:34 for pipelines overview 14:24:12 of course you can add any extra needed from your side there as well 14:24:14 :D 14:24:56 sorry ulik 14:24:59 please go ahead 14:25:07 No problem! 14:25:08 was just looking at Morgan's document 14:25:37 Do we need more instructions how to work with documentation and produced artifacts? 14:26:04 artifacts meaning generated documents? 14:26:08 I think we are fine for the moment. OK? 14:26:30 if so vlaza's documentation regarding how to work with documentation is good 14:26:35 so we are fine if you ask me 14:26:44 yep we are fine working with victor 14:26:55 Good. 14:27:11 #info Action from April 13: Uli to clarify in TSC whether Octopus documentation is part of Arno 14:27:41 I tried to clarify once and afterwards thought they accepted. Next TSC meeting was unclear again. 14:28:23 I think it shouldn't be part of arno 14:28:32 since we are not releasing CI or infra 14:29:27 Arno is releasing that we are able to do continuous build deploy and test. 14:29:39 yes, that's right 14:29:52 but if you say "octopus documentation is part of arno" 14:30:08 I understood it as "Octopus documents are part of arno release package" 14:30:24 together with Arno license, version, user's guide, etc. 14:30:51 did openstack release openstack-infra as part of kilo? 14:30:53 anyone knows? 14:31:07 personally I think docs we have done can be part of arno 14:31:16 ok 14:31:29 openstack has a infra group there 14:31:33 then I can say "we should have build tools, git info, gerrit info, etc.etc. should be part of arno" 14:31:47 docs of other projects is also the part of arno? 14:31:56 nope 14:32:07 only bgs, functest, pharos, opnfvdocs are part 14:32:14 bgs releases installers 14:32:20 functest releases test spec 14:32:29 pharos releases testbed infra 14:32:31 So anything a user needs to deploy should be there. 14:32:49 users will get genesis stuff (ISOs) 14:32:52 but not OPNFV CI 14:33:15 They should get deploy scripts or something. 14:33:28 that is in genesis repo 14:33:52 such as the "how to link to jenkins" doc is a user guide in some way 14:34:10 the distinction I have is 14:34:19 the thing users will get as Arno 14:34:29 and the things we do to run CI for OPNFV 14:34:59 so release documentation vs reference documentation is the thing I'm differentiating 14:35:12 but if the rest thinks it should be part of Arno 14:35:15 then +1 14:35:21 -1 14:35:22 vote 14:35:40 I think it is more complex. 14:36:06 for instance how to connect a lab is may be not Arno. 14:36:20 But how to deploy my ISO should be in Arno. 14:36:32 and that is included in genesis documentation 14:36:44 And how to automate my test 14:36:49 ? 14:36:58 and that is part of functest 14:37:01 We say that Arno contains automation ...... 14:37:17 So anything a user needs to deploy should be there-----------agree! 14:37:32 users don't need OPNFV Jenkins info 14:37:35 I think BGS does deploy, functest does test, who does automate? 14:37:35 or pipelines 14:37:48 it is up to users to automate 14:37:55 whicever they want 14:38:09 they can use crontab 14:38:14 use travis-ci 14:38:21 use hudson 14:39:00 here are 2 examples for fuel 14:39:00 https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/genesis/tree/fuel/docs/src/build-instructions.rst 14:39:06 https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/genesis/tree/fuel/docs/src/installation-instructions.rst 14:39:29 anyway 14:39:31 it looks like we can't get consensus today about the borderline 14:39:34 you don't have to convince me 14:40:13 hha yep, everyone can have his/her own opinions 14:40:16 I just want to understand what do people mean is content of Arno when we say automation is part of Arno. 14:40:27 automation is not part of arno 14:40:34 automation/CI is what we do for OPNFV 14:40:40 to highlight the fact that we have CI 14:40:51 we continuously build, deploy, test and give feedback to community 14:40:56 automation is always mentioned in the release descriptions. 14:41:33 Let me check and ask around... and then let's come back with the question whether we need something of octopus in arno docs. 14:41:39 ok 14:42:03 #action ulik: ask around... and then let's come back with the question whether we need something of octopus in arno docs. 14:42:17 Last action of April 13: 14:42:34 #info Action from April 13: Uli to start discussion on etherpad and send email to all projects 14:42:56 I hesitated to send an email to whole community yet. 14:43:15 And I didn't have the time today to look at the etherpad. 14:43:31 What say? wait or send email? 14:44:05 I say we can wait until after Arno is out of door 14:44:35 I think we had better make this clear befor Arno is released 14:44:43 since BGS and FuncTest are the ones who worked with us more 14:44:59 and they have more insiders knowledge about what we have and how we work 14:45:13 I don't think they will have chance to look at our etherpad until arno is done 14:45:26 so it might get lost within arno discussions 14:46:18 I would propose we share the link where we have private discussions. But no official email to join the brainstorm yet. 14:46:31 yep, that is better 14:46:54 But feel free to share the link (I did it once....) 14:47:09 MatthewL2: you fine with that? 14:47:17 yep 14:47:39 it's fine with me 14:47:45 #agree we share the link to R2 etherpad where we have private discussions. But no official email to join the brainstorm yet. 14:47:57 #info That was all action items 14:48:12 #topic Arno Release Follow-up 14:48:24 fdegir: can you summarize? 14:48:35 with #info 14:48:38 #info Not much progress as of yet 14:48:54 #info We've been waiting for BGS to give us greenlight 14:49:14 So they still struggle to deploy on LF???? 14:49:19 #info As of today, we got OK from Foreman to start with basic Jenkins automation 14:49:45 I think foreman is almost there - need to see it from jenkins 14:49:51 #info Fuel is also very close 14:50:11 #info Regarding FuncTest, we had some executions on Ericsson server 14:50:32 #info and will continue with the rest of FuncTest work once we have Foreman deploy part is put on Jenkins 14:50:54 #info that is on LF POD 14:51:22 Do you think I can report something tomorrow about Foreman deploying via jenkins on LF tomorrow in TSC? 14:51:52 hopefully 14:51:57 depending on how it goes 14:52:05 we have 23 hours to make it work 14:52:11 :) 14:52:25 Just let me know before TSC starts 14:52:29 will do 14:52:58 I think that's all for Octopus Arno reporting 14:52:58 Anything else? 14:53:27 #topic Status lab connections 14:53:56 Did we connect CMCC lab yet? 14:53:57 #info We are still in same situation 14:54:18 CMCC (China Mobile?) hasn't been connected yet 14:54:57 They are preparing..... 14:55:02 #info See the slaves connected to OPNFV Jenkins from below link 14:55:04 #link https://build.opnfv.org/ci/computer/ 14:55:49 #info We have 7 labs connected (6 community labs + LF lab) 14:56:08 yep, they are trying to connect now these days, don't know if they completed 14:56:14 Sounds good enough. 14:56:16 Orange used to be, but we are reconfiguring some machines to welcome Arno.. 14:56:35 I have contact Fuqiao(china mobile), she will ask me for help if she need 14:56:51 So with CMCC it will be 8 :) 14:57:13 Let's move on. 14:57:22 #topic Documentation status 14:57:35 #info I think we covered that during Action item review 14:57:44 Or anything open? 14:57:44 extensively 14:58:07 Otherwise let's close in time and make Frank happy. 14:58:17 AOB? 14:58:41 Thanks everybody for joining! 14:58:46 thanks 14:58:55 #endmeeting