13:59:22 <tallgren> #startmeeting Weekly TSC meeting
13:59:22 <collabot`> Meeting started Tue Mar 21 13:59:22 2017 UTC.  The chair is tallgren. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:59:22 <collabot`> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
13:59:22 <collabot`> The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_tsc_meeting'
13:59:45 <tallgren> #info Tapio Tallgren
13:59:54 <hongbo123456> #info hongbo
14:00:31 <bh526r> #info Bin Hu
14:00:51 <rossella_s> #info Rossella Sblendido
14:01:13 <morgan_orange> #info Morgan Richomme
14:01:25 <edgarstp> #info Edgar StPierre
14:01:29 <bjskerry> #info Brian Skerry
14:01:31 <frankbrockners> #info Frank Brockners
14:01:33 <rpaik> we now have a quorum
14:01:35 <fdegir> #info Fatih Degirmenci
14:01:36 <naga_lenovo> #info naga chumbalkar
14:01:43 <uli-k> #info Uli
14:01:45 <dneary> #info Dave Neary
14:01:45 <jmorgan1> #info Jack Morgan
14:02:18 <rpaik> #topic previous minutes
14:02:31 <rpaik> #info no comments on previous minutes, thus approved
14:02:39 <rpaik> #topic agenda bashing
14:02:47 <bryan_att> #info Bryan Sullivan
14:02:54 <rpaik> #link https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-March21,2017 today's agenda
14:03:03 <timirnich> #info Tim Irnich
14:03:07 <rpaik> #info no other topics suggested
14:03:21 <ebrjohn> #info Brady Johnson
14:04:24 <rpaik> #topic creation review for samplevnf
14:05:28 <rprakash> #info rprakash
14:06:20 <XavierCosta> #info Xavier Costa
14:06:26 <rpaik> #info Kannan notes that the samplevnf project is to create a repository of sample VNFs to help VNF benchmarking and NFVi characterization with real world traffic
14:07:19 <rpaik> #info addressed questions from the community on Apache 2.0 licensing and all source code will be available (no binaries) on OPNFV repos
14:07:45 <tallgren> ##chair rpaik
14:07:48 <frankbrockners> rpaik: Just talked to Koren - he should be here soon (he has issues connecting)
14:08:50 <rpaik> #info main goal is to help with VNF benchmarking and characterization
14:09:03 <tallgren> #chair rpaik
14:09:03 <collabot`> Current chairs: rpaik tallgren
14:09:40 <Julien-zte> #info Julien
14:12:17 <trevor_intel> #info Trevor Cooper
14:12:46 <tallgren> #info The Sample VNFs will consist of several VMs and can be used for load testing the virtual  infrastructure
14:14:25 <rpaik> #info also planning to look at service chaining in the future
14:14:25 <tallgren> #info The Sample VNFs could also be used for testing service chaining
14:14:30 <tallgren> #undo
14:14:30 <collabot`> Removing item from minutes: <MeetBot.ircmeeting.items.Info object at 0x2264450>
14:15:31 <tallgren> #info The VNFs are data plane optimized and distributed
14:17:04 <rpaik> #info also plans for distributed instances in the future
14:18:45 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve creation of the sampleVNF project? (+1, 0, -1)
14:18:45 <collabot`> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve creation of the sampleVNF project? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
14:18:45 <collabot`> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
14:18:48 <dneary> #vote +1
14:18:51 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
14:18:51 <morgan_orange> #vote +1
14:18:52 <naga_lenovo> #vote +1
14:18:52 <jmorgan1> #vote +1
14:18:52 <bjskerry> #vote +1
14:18:54 <fdegir> #vote +1
14:18:54 <dneary> This is a great project
14:18:55 <XavierCosta> +1
14:18:56 <rossella_s> #vote +1
14:18:57 <edgarstp> #vote +1
14:18:58 <timirnich> #vote +1
14:18:58 <hongbo123456> #vote +1
14:19:05 <uli-k> #vote +1
14:19:07 <rpaik> #endvote
14:19:07 <collabot`> Voted on "does the TSC approve creation of the sampleVNF project?" Results are
14:19:07 <collabot`> +1 (12): dneary, frankbrockners, timirnich, fdegir, morgan_orange, uli-k, naga_lenovo, rossella_s, hongbo123456, bjskerry, edgarstp, jmorgan1
14:20:12 <rpaik> #topic creation review for VINA
14:20:54 <rpaik> #info Koren notes that the VINA project addresses assurance and monitoring for VIM
14:22:57 <rpaik> #info focus will be on monitoring, visualization, monitoring, root cause analysis, etc.
14:24:13 <tallgren> I lost network connection for a whil
14:24:17 <tallgren> while
14:28:34 <rpaik> #info Koren notes that VINA aims to take a top-down view (vs. other approaches taken e.g. by skydive)
14:35:25 <rpaik> #startvote does the TSC approve creation of the VINA projects? (+1, 0, -1)
14:35:25 <collabot`> Begin voting on: does the TSC approve creation of the VINA projects? Valid vote options are , +1, 0, -1, .
14:35:25 <collabot`> Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.
14:35:34 <bjskerry> #vote +1
14:35:36 <jmorgan1> #vote +1
14:35:36 <frankbrockners> #vote +1
14:35:38 <tallgren> #vote +1
14:35:41 <fdegir> #vote +1
14:35:43 <edgarstp> #vote +1
14:35:44 <morgan_orange> #vote +1
14:35:47 <XavierCosta> #vote +1
14:35:47 <Julien-zte> #vote +1
14:35:50 <rossella_s> #vote +1
14:36:02 <rpaik> #endvote
14:36:02 <collabot`> Voted on "does the TSC approve creation of the VINA projects?" Results are
14:36:02 <collabot`> +1 (10): frankbrockners, fdegir, morgan_orange, Julien-zte, tallgren, rossella_s, XavierCosta, bjskerry, edgarstp, jmorgan1
14:36:05 <uli-k> #vote +1
14:36:07 <dneary> #vote 0
14:36:16 <timirnich> #vote +1
14:36:20 <dneary> rpaik, A bit fast on the trigger there
14:36:34 <colindixon> all good
14:36:43 <tallgren> We are short on time...
14:36:46 * ebrjohn Is Phill Collins on the call?!?!?
14:36:51 <rpaik> #topic Danube planning and timeline
14:37:18 <dneary> tallgrenSure, but having voting open for 30s is a bit quick
14:37:42 <hongbo123456> ...
14:38:19 <rpaik> #info dmcbride notes that community is continuing to make progress on Danube 1.0, but a bit behind compared to the Colorado release
14:38:28 <tallgren> dneary: I see you voted "0". We need to update that to the minutes somehow
14:39:34 <dneary> tallgren: There were also 2 missing +1s
14:39:38 <rpaik> #info less than 1/2 of the Danube 1.0 target scenarios have been deployed
14:40:00 <tallgren> Yep..
14:40:06 <rpaik> #info handful of scenarios are having successful Functest runs
14:42:09 <rpaik> #info few projects like onosfw, bottlenecks, etc. are still working through some issues
14:44:04 <rpaik> #info tallgren notes that we probably do not have sufficient information on making a decision on Danube 1.0
14:44:55 <ebrjohn> Seems a bit sketchy with so much variance less than a week before release... just my 2 cents
14:46:27 <rpaik> #info morgan_orange notes that more time is needed for troubleshooting in general
14:49:26 <rpaik> #info also more time is needed on documentation
14:50:17 <jose_lausuch> 1 week would give more iterations to fill up the status of each scenario
14:50:27 <jose_lausuch> but it doesnt mean the issues will be fixed
14:51:18 <ebrjohn> jose_lausuch: +1
14:53:06 <ebrjohn> It would be interesting to get the point of view from the application projects... OPNFV SFC for instance didnt have a CI deployable scenario available until Thursday last week
14:53:15 <rpaik> #info consensus to create a revised schedule/get well plan in the release meeting
14:53:20 <ebrjohn> That doesnt leave much time to react
14:54:53 <rpaik> #topic ODL release timing
14:56:12 <rpaik> #info colindixon notes that release timing for ODL has not always worked with OPNFV and ODL community is considering twice a year release cycle
14:57:28 <rpaik> #info question to the OPNFV community is when is the ideal time for ODL to release?
14:59:59 <colindixon> #info ebrjohn says that he'd like to see a 3 month shift from ODL release to OPNFV release
15:00:13 <rpaik> #info discussion of aligning ODL with OpenStack release
15:00:26 <colindixon> #info colindixon and phrobb point out that the pushback on that is that it might incentivize shipping features in ODL SRs vs. waiting for the next release
15:01:03 <colindixon> #info there's some suggestions that ODL line up with OpenStack and then OPNFV come some time after that
15:01:51 <dneary> +1 for F2F session on Monday 4th
15:01:59 <dneary> Monday 3rd
15:02:48 <tallgren> #endmeeting