===========================================
#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion
===========================================


Meeting started by rpaik at 13:00:38 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2017/opnfv-meeting.2017-07-20-13.00.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Jose Lausuch  (jose_lausuch, 13:00:52)
* Ray Paik  (rpaik, 13:01:00)
* Uli  (uli-k, 13:01:41)
* Tim Irnich  (timirnich, 13:03:57)
* LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Tc+Agenda+20170720 today's
  agenda  (rpaik, 13:04:26)
* installer design process  (rpaik, 13:06:04)
  * LINK:
    https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-July/017090.html
    email from Bryan  (rpaik, 13:06:39)
  * bryan_att notes that he has not gotten any feedback on the community
    (rpaik, 13:07:14)
  * challenges with integration of SDN controllers that are not specific
    to each installers  (rpaik, 13:10:16)

* Dockerhub trial  (rpaik, 13:13:38)
  * LINK:
    https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2017-July/017174.html
    Jose's email  (rpaik, 13:13:59)
  * LINK: https://hub.docker.com/r/opnfv/functest-core/builds/
    (jose_lausuch, 13:15:00)
  * jose_lausuch notes that we can synchronize the OPNFV github account
    with Docker image in Dockerhub and trialed this in Functest  (rpaik,
    13:15:31)
  * so far have been using a free account in Dockerhub that offer
    limited parallel builds  (rpaik, 13:16:53)
  * jose_lausuch noted that this can save build server resources in
    OPNFV  (rpaik, 13:18:50)
  * also saves effort needed to manage docker images  (rpaik, 13:19:37)
  * GeraldK asks if there are risks of going with an outside vendor
    (rpaik, 13:21:32)
  * ACTION: jose_lausuch to continue the conversation in the mailing
    list  (rpaik, 13:26:08)

* auto project proposal  (rpaik, 13:26:21)
  * Tina Tsou and bryan_att discuss the project proposal  (rpaik,
    13:28:51)
  * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=12387216
    project proposal page  (rpaik, 13:29:11)
  * focus will be on ONAP component integration/verification  (rpaik,
    13:31:05)
  * suggestion to replace ONAP DCAE with policy  (rpaik, 13:32:59)
  * also make APP-C/VNFM more generic to go beyond the initial focus
    (rpaik, 13:33:57)
  * bryan_att notes that integration of other components (beyond orange
    dotted line) is a possibility  (rpaik, 13:40:42)
  * there was a question on how the integration will be done  (rpaik,
    13:55:39)
  * bryan_att notes that there's no plan to integrate with OPNFV
    installers so far  (rpaik, 13:59:10)
  * suggestion was made to continue the discussion on the project
    proposal next week  (rpaik, 14:01:03)



Meeting ended at 14:01:07 UTC.



Action items, by person
-----------------------

* jose_lausuch
  * jose_lausuch to continue the conversation in the mailing list



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* rpaik (28)
* collabot (3)
* jose_lausuch (2)
* timirnich (1)
* uli-k (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4