================================== #opnfv-meeting: Weekly TSC meeting ================================== Meeting started by tallgren at 13:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2017/opnfv-meeting.2017-08-01-13.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * hongbo (hongbo1599513, 13:00:23) * Frank Brockners (frankbrockners, 13:00:27) * Tapio Tallgren (tallgren, 13:00:29) * Trevor Cooper (trevor_intel, 13:00:38) * Uli Kleber (uli-k, 13:00:49) * Rossella Sblendido (rossella_s, 13:00:58) * Bryan Sullivan (bryan_att, 13:01:00) * Carlos Goncalves (proxy for Xavier Costa) (cgoncalves, 13:01:04) * Fatih Degirmenci (irc only) (fdegir, 13:01:15) * Dave Neary (dneary, 13:01:42) * naga chumbalkar (naga_lenovo, 13:01:46) * no comments on previous minutes, thus approved (rpaik, 13:02:07) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC#TSC-August1,2017 today's agenda (rpaik, 13:02:32) * o other topics (rpaik, 13:02:53) * no other topics (rpaik, 13:03:02) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Euphrates (frankbrockners, 13:03:28) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/bamboo/Bamboo+Euphrates (rpaik, 13:03:50) * frankbrockners summarized use cases for Bamboo that was presented at the Beijing Summit (rpaik, 13:04:37) * the pricing is around $388/mo. for GCE (rpaik, 13:05:40) * Stuart Mackie (StuartMackie, 13:06:26) * fuqiao (fuqiao, 13:06:29) * suggestion is to try this out for about 6 months and evaluate continuing to make this investment (rpaik, 13:06:47) * bryan_att notes that it's not fully clear from wiki what the outcome of the exercise is (rpaik, 13:08:48) * frannkbrockners notes that the proposed value is correlation of data amongst test results from functest, qtip, and barometer (rpaik, 13:09:33) * trevor_intel asks what's the goal of finding correlation between test data (rpaik, 13:11:46) * frankbrockners notes that for example that we currently don't fully understand some of the data from Yardstick and post processing may help (so this is an exploratory effort) (rpaik, 13:13:11) * tallgren asks how long it would take to get a sense of how useful the exercise is and can we set an earlier milestone (rpaik, 13:14:55) * frankbrockners notes that taking aware BM resources for this excercise may not be a good idea (rpaik, 13:17:06) * VOTE: Voted on "Does TSC approve Bamboo project to try this experiment for 3 months and use budget from TSC initiatives?" Results are, 0: 1, +1: 13 (rpaik, 13:19:33) * LF IT/Infra update (rpaik, 13:20:06) * Java security update was done over the weekend and no other maintennance planned (rpaik, 13:20:58) * Euphrates update (rpaik, 13:21:12) * LINK: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/SWREL/Milestone+Exception+Requests+for+Euphrates (cgoncalves, 13:21:56) * dmcbride notes that Exception Request for MS5 has started and received a large number of requests (10) and most are requesting collapsing MS5 & MS6 on Aug. 11th (rpaik, 13:22:13) * dmcbride notes that he has not heard back from 2-3 projects on MS5 (rpaik, 13:23:15) * MS5 exception requests (rpaik, 13:28:21) * ARMBand team was impacted by for Danube 3.0 delay and exception for MS3 (rpaik, 13:28:59) * Fuel migration to MCP is also a challenge may need ~2 additional weeks at most (rpaik, 13:29:41) * Fuel team also does not have ETA for BM deployment currently (rpaik, 13:31:34) * however Armband team is helping with BM deployment work (rpaik, 13:32:34) * discussion on collapsing MS5 & MS6 (rpaik, 13:34:00) * there's also a discussion on shifting the entire schedule out by 2 weeks (since Danube 3.0 was late) (rpaik, 13:35:41) * VOTE: Voted on "does the TSC approve shifting the entire Euphrates release schedule out by 2 weeks?" Results are, +1: 12 (rpaik, 13:41:54) * question on how to handle current exception reviews posted on the wiki (rpaik, 13:43:09) * ACTION: dmcbride to follow-up with PTLs who submitted exceptions (rpaik, 13:44:30) * there's a comment column on the wiki table where PTLs can note withdrawl of their request (rpaik, 13:45:26) * tallgren asks if there were other causes for exceptions (besides the Danube 3.0 delay) (rpaik, 13:46:46) * discussion on the quality of subsequent SR's but resource is a challenge when they have to work on SR plus the next release (rpaik, 13:52:24) * frankbrockners asks have all scenarios that used be dependent on Fuel migrate to other installers (rpaik, 13:53:34) * dmcbride notes that most of the Fuel dependent scenarios migrated to different installers (rpaik, 13:54:14) * what about scenarios that are using xci, are these part of the "release"? (rpaik, 13:55:16) * does the TSC need to better qualify what constitutes a release (e.g. delivering a stable system, OpenStack version, etc.)? (rpaik, 13:57:49) * ACTION: dmcbride and fdegir to report back to the TSC on the topic in about a month (rpaik, 14:01:15) Meeting ended at 14:01:18 UTC. Action items, by person ----------------------- * dmcbride * dmcbride to follow-up with PTLs who submitted exceptions * dmcbride and fdegir to report back to the TSC on the topic in about a month * fdegir * dmcbride and fdegir to report back to the TSC on the topic in about a month People present (lines said) --------------------------- * rpaik (46) * collabot (14) * dneary (8) * tallgren (6) * fdegir (4) * frankbrockners (4) * fuqiao (4) * cgoncalves (4) * trevor_intel (4) * hongbo1599513 (3) * StuartMackie (3) * rossella_s (3) * naga_lenovo (3) * uli-k (3) * yifei (2) * rbbratta (2) * bryan_att (1) * trozet (1) * Yaron_ (1) * ChrisPriceAB (1) * dmcbride (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4