#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion

Meeting started by bh526r at 14:01:24 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (bh526r, 14:01:50)
    1. Bin Hu (bh526r, 14:02:06)
    2. Ray Paik (bh526r, 14:02:11)
    3. Tapio Tallgren (bh526r, 14:02:20)
    4. Tim Irnich (bh526r, 14:04:02)
    5. Al Morton (bh526r, 14:04:29)
    6. Al Morton (acm, 14:06:00)
    7. Ray Paik (rpaik, 14:06:10)

  2. Continue Discussion of OPNFV Constituency (bh526r, 14:07:20)
    1. Ray shared the data he collected (bh526r, 14:07:37)
    2. including top 50 list of Git reviewers, submitters/merged patches, wiki contributors (bh526r, 14:13:22)
    3. Ray suggested we can set a bar as simple as "top 50 of each tool" (bh526r, 14:14:19)
    4. Tim said that it might be unfair, because the bar is not the absolute contribution to the community, but the contribution relative to other contributors (bh526r, 14:15:03)
    5. Ray said it also has downside (bh526r, 14:16:05)
    6. https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2018-January/020010.html (rpaik, 14:17:02)
    7. total number of persons that made at least 1 patch is about 260 persons (bh526r, 14:20:17)
    8. Tim suggested that we can combine all contributions together, and set a bar, say 10 or more contributions (bh526r, 14:21:36)
    9. e.g. add number of patches + number of reviews + number of wiki edits, this is combined contributions (bh526r, 14:22:51)
    10. Tim said "the union of all contributions" (bh526r, 14:23:36)
    11. Ray said 10 seems low bar, how about 50? (bh526r, 14:24:57)
    12. Whatever number is, we don't know what exactly the number is, but the consensus is the union of the tools (bh526r, 14:26:53)
    13. Tim suggested that let's use 10, 20, 40, 50 as threshold, and see who the people are based on the different threshold. (bh526r, 14:28:08)
    14. The list is not about who can be on TSC, but who can vote. (bh526r, 14:31:01)
    15. another idea is for example, union of tools and at least one merged patch. (bh526r, 14:31:30)
    16. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/TSC+composition+discussion#TSCcompositiondiscussion-Activitiestoinclude (rpaik, 14:33:35)
    17. PTL review will cover those who are active, but may not meet those criteria (bh526r, 14:36:12)
    18. Group has consensus on the criteria, and the method of union of criteria. The open question is the appropriate number. (bh526r, 14:39:21)
    19. Ray will document it on the wiki (bh526r, 14:40:13)

  3. AOB (bh526r, 14:45:53)
    1. Bin will ping Jack and Julien for Pharos 2.0 review (bh526r, 14:46:15)
    2. Tim gave a heads-up that TSC will discuss Apex using XCI, and the discussion may have to route to Thursday's meeting (bh526r, 14:48:43)
    3. Fatih will talk about update of XCI (bh526r, 14:48:57)
    4. Bin will look for feedback of having projects, especially feature projects, to present status update on Thursday meetings (bh526r, 14:49:53)
    5. Nothing else, meeting adjourned (bh526r, 14:50:13)


Meeting ended at 14:50:16 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. bh526r (32)
  2. rpaik (3)
  3. collabot (3)
  4. acm (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.