===========================================
#opnfv-meeting: Weekly Technical Discussion
===========================================


Meeting started by bh526r at 14:01:24 UTC.  The full logs are available
at
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opnfv-meeting/2018/opnfv-meeting.2018-01-25-14.01.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------

* Roll Call  (bh526r, 14:01:50)
  * Bin Hu  (bh526r, 14:02:06)
  * Ray Paik  (bh526r, 14:02:11)
  * Tapio Tallgren  (bh526r, 14:02:20)
  * Tim Irnich  (bh526r, 14:04:02)
  * Al Morton  (bh526r, 14:04:29)
  * Al Morton  (acm, 14:06:00)
  * Ray Paik  (rpaik, 14:06:10)

* Continue Discussion of OPNFV Constituency  (bh526r, 14:07:20)
  * Ray shared the data he collected  (bh526r, 14:07:37)
  * including top 50 list of Git reviewers, submitters/merged patches,
    wiki contributors  (bh526r, 14:13:22)
  * Ray suggested we can set a bar as simple as "top 50 of each tool"
    (bh526r, 14:14:19)
  * Tim said that it might be unfair, because the bar is not the
    absolute contribution to the community, but the contribution
    relative to other contributors  (bh526r, 14:15:03)
  * Ray said it also has downside  (bh526r, 14:16:05)
  * LINK:
    https://lists.opnfv.org/pipermail/opnfv-tech-discuss/2018-January/020010.html
    (rpaik, 14:17:02)
  * total number of persons that made at least 1 patch is about 260
    persons  (bh526r, 14:20:17)
  * Tim suggested that we can combine all contributions together, and
    set a bar, say 10 or more contributions  (bh526r, 14:21:36)
  * e.g. add number of patches + number of reviews + number of wiki
    edits, this is combined contributions  (bh526r, 14:22:51)
  * Tim said "the union of all contributions"  (bh526r, 14:23:36)
  * Ray said 10 seems low bar, how about 50?  (bh526r, 14:24:57)
  * Whatever number is, we don't know what exactly the number is, but
    the consensus is the union of the tools  (bh526r, 14:26:53)
  * Tim suggested that let's use 10, 20, 40, 50 as threshold, and see
    who the people are based on the different threshold.  (bh526r,
    14:28:08)
  * The list is not about who can be on TSC, but who can vote.  (bh526r,
    14:31:01)
  * another idea is for example, union of tools and at least one merged
    patch.  (bh526r, 14:31:30)
  * LINK:
    https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/TSC+composition+discussion#TSCcompositiondiscussion-Activitiestoinclude
    (rpaik, 14:33:35)
  * PTL review will cover those who are active, but may not meet those
    criteria  (bh526r, 14:36:12)
  * Group has consensus on the criteria, and the method of union of
    criteria. The open question is the appropriate number.  (bh526r,
    14:39:21)
  * Ray will document it on the wiki  (bh526r, 14:40:13)

* AOB  (bh526r, 14:45:53)
  * Bin will ping Jack and Julien for Pharos 2.0 review  (bh526r,
    14:46:15)
  * Tim gave a heads-up that TSC will discuss Apex using XCI, and the
    discussion may have to route to Thursday's meeting  (bh526r,
    14:48:43)
  * Fatih will talk about update of XCI  (bh526r, 14:48:57)
  * Bin will look for feedback of having projects, especially feature
    projects, to present status update on Thursday meetings  (bh526r,
    14:49:53)
  * Nothing else, meeting adjourned  (bh526r, 14:50:13)



Meeting ended at 14:50:16 UTC.



People present (lines said)
---------------------------

* bh526r (32)
* rpaik (3)
* collabot (3)
* acm (1)



Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4